Revision as of 18:50, 30 December 2024 view sourceMusikBot (talk | contribs)Edit filter helpers, Bots, Mass message senders209,276 edits Bot clerking: archiving (1 approved) (1 open request remaining)← Previous edit |
Revision as of 21:50, 30 December 2024 view source MusikBot (talk | contribs)Edit filter helpers, Bots, Mass message senders209,276 edits Bot clerking: archiving (1 approved) (1 open request remaining)Next edit → |
Line 19: |
Line 19: |
|
:Hi {{u|NXcrypto}}, please undo ] and respond to {{u|Worldbruce}}'s concern. It doesn't look like the worst kind of edit warring I've ever seen, but {{u|Worldbruce}} was concerned about it without being involved in the reverting, so you should probably take a moment to address their concerns instead of throwing them away. The edit summary of ] indicates that their primary concern is you not (yet?) using the article's talk page. If that's true, perhaps change it or announce that you are not longer interested and ] from the conflict. ] (]) 22:13, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
:Hi {{u|NXcrypto}}, please undo ] and respond to {{u|Worldbruce}}'s concern. It doesn't look like the worst kind of edit warring I've ever seen, but {{u|Worldbruce}} was concerned about it without being involved in the reverting, so you should probably take a moment to address their concerns instead of throwing them away. The edit summary of ] indicates that their primary concern is you not (yet?) using the article's talk page. If that's true, perhaps change it or announce that you are not longer interested and ] from the conflict. ] (]) 22:13, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
::Reverted and replied on both venues, talk page and article talk page. Thanks. ] <small><small>]</small></small> 00:18, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
::Reverted and replied on both venues, talk page and article talk page. Thanks. ] <small><small>]</small></small> 00:18, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
====]==== |
|
|
*{{rfplinks|1=Randomdude121}} |
|
|
Hi! Though I started out doing grammar fixes, over the past 2 weeks, I've been using ] and ] to revert any vandalism seen on ]. It's understandable if you'd like to impose the hard and fast rule of 1-month experience, but I've made almost 300 edits related to vandalism. I always leave a message for the editor and undo my revert in cases where I question my decision in hindsight and would rather have another pair of eyes look at the edit(s). |
|
|
|
|
|
Having the rollback permission would make ] reverting faster for me and would also allow me to try out other anti-vandalism tools like ]. Could I have the right please? ] (]) 09:19, 21 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Hi {{u|Randomdude121}}, I'll grant this without expiry, but with an expectation of you please, please going slowly with Huggle for the first weeks and asking rather than guessing when something is unclear. My talk page will always be open to questions even if you think they may seem silly. ] (]) 21:47, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:{{done}} ] (]) 21:48, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
I would like to request rollback rights to combat vandalism more efficiently. I am an experienced recent changes patroller and I understand that the rollback should be used mainly for clear cases of vandalism. I am committed to using this tool responsibly. Nxcrypto Message 12:07, 19 December 2024 (UTC)