| Revision as of 23:37, 18 February 2006 editNumerao (talk | contribs)759 edits →Too complicated← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:04, 29 April 2007 edit undo87.65.74.245 (talk) →Too complicatedNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Too complicated == | == Too complicated == | ||
| Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
| ::i think Theonlyedge probly read a random paragraph in the middle, or fixated on that compilcated looking formula and said "too complex". If you read hte article from the begining, its "too simple"! ] 23:37, 18 February 2006 (UTC) | ::i think Theonlyedge probly read a random paragraph in the middle, or fixated on that compilcated looking formula and said "too complex". If you read hte article from the begining, its "too simple"! ] 23:37, 18 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ----- | |||
| Error in number 987654521, should be 987654321 | |||
| ----- | |||
Revision as of 21:04, 29 April 2007
Too complicated
This is unneccesarily complex. Could the author, or someone who understands what is being discussed simplify the text. Thanks, Theonlyedge 21:18, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
- Could you be a little more specific as to what makes you think the article is "unneccesarily complex"? I know summation notation (mathematical formulas using the Greek letter Σ) can look scary to some people, but I thought that the listing of actual pandigital numbers (12345678900, 12345678901, etc.) made the concept more understandable, and I actually worried that the ideas might be so simple and obvious as to appear condescending. PrimeFan 22:08, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
- i think Theonlyedge probly read a random paragraph in the middle, or fixated on that compilcated looking formula and said "too complex". If you read hte article from the begining, its "too simple"! Numerao 23:37, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Error in number 987654521, should be 987654321