| Revision as of 09:26, 26 April 2007 view sourceHornplease (talk | contribs)9,260 edits Narendra Modi← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:22, 30 April 2007 view source El elan (talk | contribs)45 edits →[]: replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| Thank you for your recent edits. It would be helpful if, once done, you could put in a brief justification on the talkpage in case they are challenged. ] 09:26, 26 April 2007 (UTC) | Thank you for your recent edits. It would be helpful if, once done, you could put in a brief justification on the talkpage in case they are challenged. ] 09:26, 26 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *I will be in WikiBreak soon. I have seen that discussion. But I expect it to stay as <s>allegation of</s> fake encounter has become (to Modi) what ] is to ] or ] is to ]. ] 09:22, 30 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:22, 30 April 2007
Ambedkar revert
My revert was of a controversial edit without a source - blaming the police for the violence. The edit that was reinstated is POV and needs a good source, I agree. Rama's arrow (3:16) 16:36, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- We cannot be judgmental - blaming police is not "unencyclopedic" - what does that mean? The problem is simple - either sentence you keep has a problem in terms of needing a citation and conforming to WP:NPOV. I don't find accusations on "Dalit Buddhists" to be less or more acceptable than the police. Rama's arrow (3:16) 04:38, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- I think I have ansered it here. Nothing is more or less acceptable. What you removed as controversial can be sourced easily and what you inserted is a POV. El elan 05:58, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- And Manohar Kadam's conduct is not an issue to be covered in the biography of Ambedkar. That's something for an article on the riots. Rama's arrow (3:16) 04:39, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- You are right; this is a problem with many of the articles. But the removal on the grounds of "controversial" is not acceptable.El elan 06:53, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Narendra Modi
Thank you for your recent edits. It would be helpful if, once done, you could put in a brief justification on the talkpage in case they are challenged. Hornplease 09:26, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
- I will be in WikiBreak soon. I have seen that discussion. But I expect it to stay as
allegation offake encounter has become (to Modi) what Anna Politkovskaya is to Vladimir Putin or Nandigram is to Buddhadeb Bhattacharya. El elan 09:22, 30 April 2007 (UTC)