| Revision as of 07:57, 4 May 2007 editGiacomo1968 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers12,805 edits →Warning← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:21, 4 May 2007 edit undoT-man, the Wise Scarecrow (talk | contribs)4,742 editsm →WarningNext edit → | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| :::::Would you help me by putting <nowiki>{{sockpuppeteerproven}}</nowiki> back at the top of his user page as indicated in ], reporting the issue to the notice board or whatever the formal procedure is?? That template might help prevent him from becoming an administrator again.--] 07:57, 4 May 2007 (UTC) | :::::Would you help me by putting <nowiki>{{sockpuppeteerproven}}</nowiki> back at the top of his user page as indicated in ], reporting the issue to the notice board or whatever the formal procedure is?? That template might help prevent him from becoming an administrator again.--] 07:57, 4 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :::::I just gave you my full support in . Keep me informed if you need any help in the matter.--] 08:21, 4 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:21, 4 May 2007
 Archives |
David O. Russell
Yeah, he's been known to be a bit of a nutbag on set. I like his movies, but the stories I've read about the Huckabees shoot are crazy. Pele Merengue 20:39, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Warning
Keep up trolling Chris Griswold, and you will be blocked from editing. He's already asked to be desysopped and can't be resysopped without going through RfA. I don't agree with what he did, but it's not your place to "punish" him or kick him while he's down. Seraphimblade 09:30, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- My apologies for doing that if it offends you or goes against Wiki policy, but can you at least see my perspective of not logging in—or contributing for months—to Misplaced Pages based on the behavior of what I thought was two users and then login in find that both of them are the same person? I agree that kicking someone when they are down is bad, but considering the damage Chris Griswold did, I feel saying that I am 'trolling' him is a harsh assesment of what I said on his talk page. He's causes stress and contention for no good reason to dozens. And he's even been interviewed in the press as an example of a 'good' Wiki editor. And now this? I will not post again, but I hope there isn't a Wiki rule against me watching his behavior in the future. I'm sure others will as well. —SpyMagician 09:37, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Of course I wouldn't object to anyone keeping an eye in the future, and I would likely be one of them. But as it stands now, the ArbCom has already dealt with the situation, and the community has pretty clearly expressed its disapproval. People do make mistakes, and he made a pretty big one, but once those are dealt with, there comes a time to drop them and move along. Seraphimblade 09:43, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Why is Chris Griswold and Ned Scott taking off the {{sockpuppeteerproven}} template at the top of his user page? As far as I know, he has no justification. That's the WP:SOCK policy!!!--T-man, the wise 07:42, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- I think it's because of the same reason Chris Griswold used sock puppets as an admin; bad judgement and an abuse of power. I too think it's hypocritical and have placed requests with other admins informing them of this behavior. Ultimately I think people are giving him th 'benefit of the doubt'. But I think it's clear if he can't even 'wear' the tag he deserves, it shows he barely understands the depth of what he did and why it was unacceptable. —SpyMagician 07:45, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- Would you help me by putting {{sockpuppeteerproven}} back at the top of his user page as indicated in WP:SOCK, reporting the issue to the notice board or whatever the formal procedure is?? That template might help prevent him from becoming an administrator again.--T-man, the wise 07:57, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- I just gave you my full support in . Keep me informed if you need any help in the matter.--T-man, the wise 08:21, 4 May 2007 (UTC)