Misplaced Pages

:Requests for checkuser/Case/ImprobabilityDrive: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser | Case Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:33, 5 May 2007 editOrangemarlin (talk | contribs)30,771 edits Deleting other sockpuppets until further evidence is presented by editor(s). Let's stick to the facts.← Previous edit Revision as of 20:59, 5 May 2007 edit undoArbustoo (talk | contribs)12,546 editsm ImprobabilityDrive: linkNext edit →
Line 17: Line 17:
are going to seek an RfC for this user, and have this users behavior. Visit ] for a instructive display of what's going on. are going to seek an RfC for this user, and have this users behavior. Visit ] for a instructive display of what's going on.


This checkuser will prove socks or vindicate the user for the RfC as well as . ] 15:50, 2 May 2007 (UTC) This checkuser will prove socks or vindicate the user for the ] as well as . ] 15:50, 2 May 2007 (UTC)


: I suspect this user is likely a sockpuppet of banned user ]. ] 01:54, 3 May 2007 (UTC) : I suspect this user is likely a sockpuppet of banned user ]. ] 01:54, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:59, 5 May 2007

ImprobabilityDrive

request links: mainedit • links • history • watch
Filed: 15:50, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
  • B,F

A new user who registered ten days ago who has since been aggressively edit warring, personal attacks, advanced knowledge of policy/tags, and straight out paranoia on creationist articles against consensus. With s/he's second edit and within 15 minutes of registering, already knew how to sign s/he username.

Show a remarkable knowledge of tags and policies with 7 days of editing. Interestingly, these edit go against a long decided consensus.

This user accuses others of being socks, but refuses to answer if s/he has had previous accounts.

Some long standing admin/editors are going to seek an RfC for this user, and have condemned this users behavior. Visit User talk:ImprobabilityDrive for a instructive display of what's going on.

This checkuser will prove socks or vindicate the user for the ImprobabilityDrive RfC as well as 3RR rules. Arbustoo 15:50, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

I suspect this user is likely a sockpuppet of banned user User:Benapgar. JoshuaZ 01:54, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
no Declined. --jpgordon 03:39, 3 May 2007 (UTC)