Misplaced Pages

User talk:Biggspowd: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:37, 7 May 2007 view sourceSamir (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators14,174 edits review unblock← Previous edit Revision as of 02:16, 7 May 2007 view source Shirahadasha (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,554 edits UnblockNext edit →
Line 38: Line 38:


Note: Increased length of block due to a previous 1-week block on April 6. --] 20:29, 6 May 2007 (UTC) Note: Increased length of block due to a previous 1-week block on April 6. --] 20:29, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
:I'll speak to Shirahadasha. It looks a little severe to me -- ] 01:37, 7 May 2007 (UTC) :I'll speak to Shirahadasha. It looks a little severe to me -- ] 01:37, 7 May 2007 (UTC)\

::I agree that ] was previously deleted, so the speedy delete tag was not ]. I have unblocked you. I regret the error. Please do heed the other warnings you were given. I also suggest not deleting warnings you disagree with, although you are welcome to respond to them. Best, --] 02:16, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:16, 7 May 2007

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Biggspowd (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have not done anything wrong, someone put a personal attack on my talk page, assuming I am a vandal (which I am not) that I put a speedy tag on a page with no basis. The basis was that the article was previously deleted. I removed the warning, as it was false and I do not want other users to assume things that are untrue. I have made some helpful edits as of late, and have put several deserving articles for AFD as well. I am not doing anything wrong or causing any harm, and I wish that this block be moved immediately.

Decline reason:

Let me speak to Shirahadasha. I agree that it looks a little harsh — Samir 01:37, 7 May 2007 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Welcome!

Hello, Biggspowd, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  --BigDT 17:35, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Don't vandalize

Don't vandalize Misplaced Pages.

Don't vandalize the Michael Richards article. Bus stop 00:22, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Video clip

You probably want to read WP:WEB before being insulted. Coren 00:39, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

I have restored the warning I put, so that other editors will see what this was about. You followed the proper procedure by placing a {{hangon}} tag on the page. An admin will now sort this out. Coren 00:41, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

List of WWE wrestlers with most championships won

Hi there; "Way too trivial a list" is not a valid speedy deletion reason. Please either find an appropriate tag in WP:CSD or, if you wish, put the article up for WP:AfD.--Anthony.bradbury 22:42, 5 May 2007 (UTC)


Just a friendly reminder to use an edit summary when proposing deletion for an article. Edit summary usage is always good, but it is especially important that edit summaries are used when proposing deletion. The reason for this is that articles proposed for deletion that later have the {{prod}} tag removed should not be proposed for deletion again, but rather sent to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion. The only easy way to check if an article was previously proposed for deletion is to look at the edit history and the edit summaries people have left before. Thanks! Oo7565 05:58, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

One Man Shy

You put a speedy delete tag on this article, a notable episode of a notable television show, which inaccurately claimed it was previously deleted. I see you have previous vandalism warnings and know that repeat vandalism can result in your being blocked from editing without further notice. --Shirahadasha 20:00, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Misplaced Pages's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

--Shirahadasha 20:16, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Note: Increased length of block due to a previous 1-week block on April 6. --Shirahadasha 20:29, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

I'll speak to Shirahadasha. It looks a little severe to me -- Samir 01:37, 7 May 2007 (UTC)\
I agree that One Man Shy was previously deleted, so the speedy delete tag was not vandalism. I have unblocked you. I regret the error. Please do heed the other warnings you were given. I also suggest not deleting warnings you disagree with, although you are welcome to respond to them. Best, --Shirahadasha 02:16, 7 May 2007 (UTC)