Revision as of 03:52, 7 May 2007 editDavidwr (talk | contribs)50,107 edits →I reverted your edits to John Glenn← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:57, 7 May 2007 edit undoTeens! (talk | contribs)126 edits →I reverted your edits to John GlennNext edit → | ||
Line 135: | Line 135: | ||
:: Mistaken attibution. Actually reverted ''to'' my previous edit. — ] (]) 03:50, 7 May 2007 (UTC) | :: Mistaken attibution. Actually reverted ''to'' my previous edit. — ] (]) 03:50, 7 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
::: You are correct. My apologies. <font color="#09f911">d</font><font color="#029d74">a</font><font color="#e35bd8">v</font><font color="#4156c5">i</font><font color="#635688">d</font><font color="#c00000">w</font>r <sup><small>]</small></sup> 03:52, 7 May 2007 (UTC) | ::: You are correct. My apologies. <font color="#09f911">d</font><font color="#029d74">a</font><font color="#e35bd8">v</font><font color="#4156c5">i</font><font color="#635688">d</font><font color="#c00000">w</font>r <sup><small>]</small></sup> 03:52, 7 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
== Problem with anon user == | |||
Hi, I noticed you reverted (and warned) anon user 76.97.5.111 about a change he recently made to an article. This user has also been vandalising my Talk page, by re-inserting a bogus warning from a banned sockpuppet which I ad removed. I suspect this user is the same as 68.219.149.22, since that user did the same to my page a while ago. anon user 76.97.5.111 has already been blocked before for vandalism, I was hoping you could block him again. ] 03:57, 7 May 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:57, 7 May 2007
This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ERcheck. |
Today is Tuesday, January 14, 2025; it is now 04:24 (UTC/GMT) |
---|
Archives |
---|
April 2006 – May 2006 |
Signpost updated for April 30th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 18 | 30 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:18, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thanks again for reverting vandalism on my user page. I really appreciate it! Hope to see you around. Chickyfuzz14 05:58, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Question
ER, I was wondering if Joseph V. Medina would be a good candidate for featured bio in the portal, since he was the first United States Marine Corps officer, in history to take command of a Naval flotilla. What do you think? Tony the Marine 21:20, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Protection
Hi. From the protection policy:
- Indefinite semi-protection may be used for: ... User pages (but not user talk pages), when requested by the user.
Emphasis mine. Your user talk page appears to have been protected since September 2006 – that seems pretty permanent to me – and the level of vandalism prior to that was nowhere near the level usually warranted for semi-protection of a page (a single user vandalizing from a single IP range). Before that one incident I don't see any anonymous edits at all for over a month. Certainly far, far less than what some of us mere mortals without the ability to protect our own talk pages at will have to deal with. Is there a good reason to keep this page protected? – Gurch 19:14, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Unprotected by me per request of ERcheck.Rlevse 01:11, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Strike Force 3
Take a look:Workshop and be my guest. Tony the Marine 07:36, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIV (April 2007)
The April 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 13:54, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Another Clay Aiken image issue
I added background info into the article. I see you updated the image description. Is there any fair use rational that you know of that I can look at for reference? - Maria202 14:02, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Strike Force Three
I've made some changes. Take a look and feel free to rephrase me since I am not at my best prose wise (I have so many things going on my mind). Tony the Marine 19:13, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Joseph V. Medina
Got rid of the redlinks in Medina's article. I agree with you, I'll look into doing an article about the whole ESG concept. In regard to the List of Hispanics, They better do something about it because as it is, it will become one hell of an disorganized and unmanageable list. Tony the Marine 20:46, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Fighting Time 20: Despre Tine Cast
Hello. I recently put a speedy deletion tag on this article, which was later removed by the creator of the article. I wanted to make sure before I put the tag back on that this page actually qualifies for speedy deletion. Thanks and hope you can help. Chickyfuzz14 21:29, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot. That helps, and I appreciate it much! =D Chickyfuzz14 21:53, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Newbie question
ER, I'm a newbie to wikipedia but my mother right now is telling me that John Edwards(the info i added) is right. What do u mean aboutdiscussing it/citing it? Where do i do that? I'm so confused. I thought u just click edit and just change whatever you want until somone disagrees with u, then they can change it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Woshinideba (talk • contribs) 00:07, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
I reverted another editors edits to John Glenn
Please see Talk:John Glenn#Revert edit of 18:55.2C 6 May 2007 ERcheck for discussion. davidwr 03:05, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Mistaken attibution. Actually reverted to my previous edit. — ERcheck (talk) 03:50, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- You are correct. My apologies. davidwr 03:52, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Mistaken attibution. Actually reverted to my previous edit. — ERcheck (talk) 03:50, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Problem with anon user
Hi, I noticed you reverted (and warned) anon user 76.97.5.111 about a change he recently made to an article. This user has also been vandalising my Talk page, by re-inserting a bogus warning from a banned sockpuppet which I ad removed. I suspect this user is the same as 68.219.149.22, since that user did the same to my page a while ago. anon user 76.97.5.111 has already been blocked before for vandalism, I was hoping you could block him again. Teens! 03:57, 7 May 2007 (UTC)