Misplaced Pages

:Requests for comment/Language and linguistics: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:03, 1 May 2007 editTeguiste (talk | contribs)142 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 15:45, 8 May 2007 edit undoCentrx (talk | contribs)37,287 edits rm old oneNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:
*], I have been trying to revise page of Babylon Translator to include criticisms. One user rejects all changes. Can one criticize a translation program? What counts as source material for criticisms?] 14:51, 30 April 2007 (UTC) *], I have been trying to revise page of Babylon Translator to include criticisms. One user rejects all changes. Can one criticize a translation program? What counts as source material for criticisms?] 14:51, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
*]; ] – Is Leet to be considered a ]? There is also a discussion on whether the article is neutral in its depiction of Leet. 04:43, 28 April 2007 (UTC) *]; ] – Is Leet to be considered a ]? There is also a discussion on whether the article is neutral in its depiction of Leet. 04:43, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
*], ], ]. Are the latter two simply discussing two of the several English language names for Chinese people? Are they simply covering the same ground under different titles? Should these articles be merged? 22:25, 2 April 2007 (UTC)


<!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP, NOT HERE. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> <!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP, NOT HERE. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>-->

Revision as of 15:45, 8 May 2007

Shortcut
  • ]

Template:RFCheader Please note that this page is reserved for disputes in articles about language or linguistics, not policy disputes or language usage in unrelated articles.

  • Talk:Babylon (program), I have been trying to revise page of Babylon Translator to include criticisms. One user rejects all changes. Can one criticize a translation program? What counts as source material for criticisms?Teguiste 14:51, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Leet; Talk:Leet – Is Leet to be considered a writing system? There is also a discussion on whether the article is neutral in its depiction of Leet. 04:43, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Category: