| Revision as of 01:33, 29 April 2005 editLeeHunter (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,703 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:07, 29 April 2005 edit undoDhartung (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers24,482 edits →incestuous blog links removedNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| I removed a couple of blog links because they didn't seem to be about anything other than an extraordinarily trivial side issue - that Cole repeated somebody else's assertion about whether some Iraqi blogger had a US sponsor. | I removed a couple of blog links because they didn't seem to be about anything other than an extraordinarily trivial side issue - that Cole repeated somebody else's assertion about whether some Iraqi blogger had a US sponsor. | ||
| I also removed the link to Riverbend. It was just a post that said, more or less, 'hey check out Juan Cole'.--] 01:33, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC) | I also removed the link to Riverbend. It was just a post that said, more or less, 'hey check out Juan Cole'.--] 01:33, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC) | ||
| :Agreed, there's nothing encyclopedic about any of those entries. --] | ] 02:07, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:07, 29 April 2005
Just because text appears identically elsewhere on the net, does that mean it is automatically copyright-protected?
from Talk:Juan Cole/Temp
I hope this is better than my first try!
Wikifed.
I hope this stub is going to replace the original page on or about November 30 (as the copyvio deletion policy states). Cole has just become newsworthy as a result of a lawsuit threat.--Dhartung 12:47, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
"Michael J. Totten"
Who is Michael J. Totten? Is he just some guy with a blog? Is the link here solely because it's something critical of Cole, or is he salient for some other reason? Sullivan and Goldberg, by contrast, are well known. —Ashley Y 03:26, 2005 Mar 19 (UTC)
- seems like it. There's now about four links there based around Totten's article purporting to be a "fisking" (new word to me, is there a wikipedia entry on it yet?) of Juan. I reckon possibly only the response by Ali to that one entry in Juan's blog is of any great significance. PaulHammond 12:28, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
incestuous blog links removed
I removed a couple of blog links because they didn't seem to be about anything other than an extraordinarily trivial side issue - that Cole repeated somebody else's assertion about whether some Iraqi blogger had a US sponsor. I also removed the link to Riverbend. It was just a post that said, more or less, 'hey check out Juan Cole'.--Lee Hunter 01:33, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)