Misplaced Pages

User talk:Digwuren/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:Digwuren Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:25, 10 May 2007 editDigwuren (talk | contribs)11,308 edits Edit summaries← Previous edit Revision as of 05:34, 10 May 2007 edit undoPetri Krohn (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users37,089 edits StalkingNext edit →
Line 39: Line 39:
Please do not call good faith edits "vandalism" as you did . -- ] 05:21, 10 May 2007 (UTC) Please do not call good faith edits "vandalism" as you did . -- ] 05:21, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
: The edit I reverted there is obviously not a good faith edit; it's a reversal to a misrepresentation of what the source says for POV-pushing purposes. ] 05:25, 10 May 2007 (UTC) : The edit I reverted there is obviously not a good faith edit; it's a reversal to a misrepresentation of what the source says for POV-pushing purposes. ] 05:25, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

== ] ==

It seems that you have started a personal edit was against me. In you reverted my minor edit that removed an extra newline from an image caption. Please stop! -- ] 05:34, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:34, 10 May 2007

Welcome!

Hello, Digwuren, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! 


Regarding reversions made on May 1 2007 to Bronze Soldier of Tallinn

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Thank you. Alex Bakharev 14:50, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Please, no more reverts. I counted six straight reverts in the last few hours, one after my warning Alex Bakharev 15:04, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

More than a day has passed since. During the time, I have explained the reversal in questions on the discussion page, and received no comments. I believe I'm now justified in reflecting the documented consensus on the main page. Digwuren 17:40, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Stop reverting my articles! (by Redstar1987)

Instead of fueling lies, you should have watched the movie and see what it shows. I have watched it and it can clearly be seen that the police car is breaking through demonstrants in a relatively high speed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Redstar1987 (talkcontribs) 20:37, 1 May 2007 (UTC).

Stalking and personal attacks

I am reverting your personal attack from Talk:Bronze Soldier of Tallinn (See: ) What you are doing is stalking, and will get you blocked. Please do not re-introduce the material. You are of course welcome to discuss the individual issues in the proper context. -- Petri Krohn 20:43, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Your accusations are baseless. Digwuren 22:34, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
I am sorry that I had to do this, but I have reported you at WP:AN/I. -- Petri Krohn 00:35, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Anonymous edits from 194.182.142.5

Form your edits it seem likely that you are the same person who contributed from IP 194.182.142.5. Can you please confirm or deny?

Yes, I made them. The address belongs to some sort of public ISP operating out of the Copenhagen International Airport, and I was anonymous because my laptop didn't have my Misplaced Pages account's password, and I didn't have a way to retrieve it from my desktop.
I would have added the confirmation under the statement to that effect on the discussion page, but my statement has already been archived. Digwuren 18:31, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

And by the way, what is Challenge 24? -- Petri Krohn 10:21, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

, of course. Digwuren 18:31, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Please do not call good faith edits "vandalism" as you did here. -- Petri Krohn 05:21, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

The edit I reverted there is obviously not a good faith edit; it's a reversal to a misrepresentation of what the source says for POV-pushing purposes. Digwuren 05:25, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Stalking

It seems that you have started a personal edit was against me. In this undo you reverted my minor edit that removed an extra newline from an image caption. Please stop! -- Petri Krohn 05:34, 10 May 2007 (UTC)