Revision as of 05:25, 10 May 2007 editDigwuren (talk | contribs)11,308 edits →Edit summaries← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:34, 10 May 2007 edit undoPetri Krohn (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users37,089 edits StalkingNext edit → | ||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
Please do not call good faith edits "vandalism" as you did . -- ] 05:21, 10 May 2007 (UTC) | Please do not call good faith edits "vandalism" as you did . -- ] 05:21, 10 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
: The edit I reverted there is obviously not a good faith edit; it's a reversal to a misrepresentation of what the source says for POV-pushing purposes. ] 05:25, 10 May 2007 (UTC) | : The edit I reverted there is obviously not a good faith edit; it's a reversal to a misrepresentation of what the source says for POV-pushing purposes. ] 05:25, 10 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
== ] == | |||
It seems that you have started a personal edit was against me. In you reverted my minor edit that removed an extra newline from an image caption. Please stop! -- ] 05:34, 10 May 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:34, 10 May 2007
Welcome!
Hello, Digwuren, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}}
after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
Regarding reversions made on May 1 2007 to Bronze Soldier of Tallinn
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Thank you. Alex Bakharev 14:50, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Please, no more reverts. I counted six straight reverts in the last few hours, one after my warning Alex Bakharev 15:04, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- More than a day has passed since. During the time, I have explained the reversal in questions on the discussion page, and received no comments. I believe I'm now justified in reflecting the documented consensus on the main page. Digwuren 17:40, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Stop reverting my articles! (by Redstar1987)
Instead of fueling lies, you should have watched the movie and see what it shows. I have watched it and it can clearly be seen that the police car is breaking through demonstrants in a relatively high speed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Redstar1987 (talk • contribs) 20:37, 1 May 2007 (UTC).
Stalking and personal attacks
I am reverting your personal attack from Talk:Bronze Soldier of Tallinn (See: ) What you are doing is stalking, and will get you blocked. Please do not re-introduce the material. You are of course welcome to discuss the individual issues in the proper context. -- Petri Krohn 20:43, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- Your accusations are baseless. Digwuren 22:34, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- I am sorry that I had to do this, but I have reported you at WP:AN/I. -- Petri Krohn 00:35, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Anonymous edits from 194.182.142.5
Form your edits it seem likely that you are the same person who contributed from IP 194.182.142.5. Can you please confirm or deny?
- Yes, I made them. The address belongs to some sort of public ISP operating out of the Copenhagen International Airport, and I was anonymous because my laptop didn't have my Misplaced Pages account's password, and I didn't have a way to retrieve it from my desktop.
- I would have added the confirmation under the statement to that effect on the discussion page, but my statement has already been archived. Digwuren 18:31, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
And by the way, what is Challenge 24? -- Petri Krohn 10:21, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- , of course. Digwuren 18:31, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Edit summaries
Please do not call good faith edits "vandalism" as you did here. -- Petri Krohn 05:21, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- The edit I reverted there is obviously not a good faith edit; it's a reversal to a misrepresentation of what the source says for POV-pushing purposes. Digwuren 05:25, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Stalking
It seems that you have started a personal edit was against me. In this undo you reverted my minor edit that removed an extra newline from an image caption. Please stop! -- Petri Krohn 05:34, 10 May 2007 (UTC)