Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 09:47, 10 May 2007

Image:Religion importance

Sakhalin is part of Russia and needs to be highlighted on this map. It is the island above Japan and to the east of mainland Russia. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.95.37.150 (talk • contribs).

Reverting edits as vandalism

When you reverted Copyright to the 15:49, 17 April 2007 version by RadiantRay, you didn't revert vandalism. You reverted a thoughtful restructuring by an anonymous user who even provided descriptive edit summaries (and a small addition by some other user). You may not agree with their edits, but simply reverting them as alleged vandalism is inappropriate. I'm sure it was a mistake, but it would be nice if you tried to clear up this issue with the affected editors. Rl 17:06, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

My mistake. I noticed that the IP had removed a large chunk of text and failed to realize that the IP thereafter moved it to a more appropriate article. I self-reverted. · j e r s y k o talk · 18:50, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Edwards

Don't just revert. You are suppose to discuss on articles like that. Listen to the experts. They have logical information. I didn't mean to say you are no good cuz you're not a doctor, but the doctors' advice for the article is good.Annalissette 01:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC) If you're going to accuse me, accuse me.Annalissette 03:25, 19 April 2007 (UTC) I assume good faith so I am not accusing you despite what i think

Sorry

Sorry, I guess I got carried away responding to his spam argument. I should have examined what eas posting. Zantaggerung 13:17, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppet question

A question on User:Annalissette who you blocked indefinitely as sockpuppet. Was this confirmed by Checkuser? I had left the editor a 3RR warning, as John Edward's page was on my watchlist, but I'm not at all familiar with the history of the banned user nor was I previously award of the edit conflicts leading to the edit war. — ERcheck (talk) 22:11, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm not questioning your decision; rather, I was curious as to what brought you to the sockpuppet block, as you'd made a comment on Annalissette's talk page about going to WP:SSP. — ERcheck (talk) 23:54, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Bellevue Edit

Hello Jersyko, I spoke with Mark Dougherty personally today. I happened to be in the meeting when he made his announcement. That is my reference, however due to the controversy I must remain anon. How would I cite that? I am still pretty new and learning my way around. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chryslerfan (talk • contribs).

Possible Citation

Jersyko, Thanks for the info concerning the Bellevue edit. I do not know if this link could be classified as a reference or not. This link is to a letter from Bryan Miller who currently chairs the Deacon board at Bellevue. This letter is posted at the Saving Bellevue website. here is the link to the letter. Thanks for your help! Chryslerfan 16:32, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Atlanta Journal-Constitution

See Talk:The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. --Zpb52 16:16, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Banned ?

Hello, I was cleaning up the adoption center... going through all the adoptees and came across User:Dereks1x. Has he been banned ? I ask because although its been stated on his page, I see no "you have been blocked indefinably" box on his pages. Thank you, please respond on my talk page so that I may take him off the adoption list or find him an adopter. thank you for your time Matthew Yeager 01:42, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Move

I believe I am unable to move the article crown and bridge to Crown (dentistry). Can you please do this as I just remade the bridge article and removed most info (I believe) of bridges from crown and bridge article. Thanks. - Dozenist talk 16:28, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

By your logic, bottlehead never mentioned your name, therefore I must be Derek (that's your initial conclusion). Why don't you, as prosecutor and judge, sentence me to the electric chair? I haven't researched Derek but some of the KCtoday comments that I read make some sense. The reality is that my Obama comments make sense, even more sense than my comments about the cow (in another article), which hasn't raised so much fuss.Lawman8 20:06, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

enforcer

You seem to ban a lot, like KCtoday and anna-something (mentioned above). If you are going to ban me, just do it. I am not for it but it seems to be coming. If you do, I request that you allow me to place a statement of protest. I don't depend on wikipedia for a living. I have a real job.Lawman8 20:41, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Sendai virus expansion

Sorry to bother you again, but I'm not too keen on walking yet without some help. (I was the guy who did the Memphis water deal.)

My question: would it be cool with you/admins/Wikipedia in general if I were to expand the Sendai virus page and make the Sendai disease page?

Talk me on my talk page, if you'd be so kind. -EarthRise33 20:49, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

WP:ANI

There's a (slightly amusing) thread about you on ANI. Check it out. :-) Grandmasterka 08:56, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

no objection

I trust your judgment in this. Tvoz |talk 16:59, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Should we submit Dereks1x for an IP check? It seems that at least two of his socks used IP addresses from different bits of the country which seems to indicate open proxies. I'd imagine more would be underlying. It might also be able to identify some of the socks for this user we haven't identified yet. --Bobblehead 18:24, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

this looks like a fishing expedition, and I expect an apology when it turns up negative. WP:AGF a little why dont you and dont WP:BITE. Hempbilly 19:26, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Fishing, gosh, where have I heard that accusation before? · jersyko talk 19:33, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Once again, I would like an apology once your allegations of my sock puppetry turn out to be wrong. And I can guarantee you they will. Hempbilly 19:40, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

You exhibited an exceptional grasp of Wiki-markup in your first ever edit to wikipedia. You already seem to know about several policies and guidelines (even their shortcuts), though this is your first day here (NPOV, AGF, BITE, etc.). May I ask how you were able to do that? · jersyko talk 19:43, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Editing in Misplaced Pages is not like building a homemade fusion reactor. The code is quite simple, I use the preview button to review syntax errors, and I have edited other articles anonamously for several months. Hempbilly 19:48, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Will you provide your anonymous IP? · jersyko talk 19:49, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Will you? If I gave up my IP you would know where I work, and how dumb would that be? Hempbilly 19:54, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

I submitted the IP check. Wonder how it'll go. Last time I submitted one it went into the round file of oblivion. --Bobblehead 20:29, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Huh?

May I ask why I've been blocked? I noticed that an administrator (User:Conscious) has obviously had his account compromised (deleting the main page etc.), and had blocked several established users, three of whom I unblocked. What, exactly did I do wrong here? I also would note that I checked AN/I, and there was no thread yet on Conscious, which I was about to start when I was blocked. · jersyko talk 18:29, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Was my fault, it was all a bit confusing. We're good. Now you have a fun block log for yourself. :) --Jimbo Wales 18:36, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Can you delete my account?

I have a really bad reputation and people keep bothering me about it, I have made second accounts, blanked my talk page, and many other things but I can not get rid of it. Can you delete my account so I can create a new one and start over? I would really appreciate it if you did because I want to start over new and have a better reputation. User:Daniel Chiswick 9 May, 2007.

Note the user's personal attack on me and his sockpuppet case: Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/Daniel Chiswick (2nd). I'd appreciate any action on that page. Thanks. Gdo01 01:16, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

How do you know it was at you? Jesus Christ Gdo01 leave me alone, you are like a stalker or something. I am trying to improve my reputation by deleting my old account or by having people like you leaving me alone. Is there a policy for stalkers on wikipedia? Because you NEVER leave me alone and are always bothering be, it is really annoying and petty. User:Daniel Chiswick 9 May, 2007.

I have not violated any policy on WP:HAR and have fully gone by the book on enforcing the rules here. If you look through my contributions to earlier sockpuppet cases, you see that I truly abhor the existence of socks, a policy that is seldom enforced or investigated until it gets bad. Enforcing the rules is not petty and you frankly have brought it on yourself by somehow thinking that Misplaced Pages did not have rules preventing people from circumventing blocks. Anyway, your request cannot be done since Right to disappear says you can only change your name. All your contributions will remain to anyone who wants to see them. Unilaterally acquiring another account can be done as long as you abide with the legitimate purposes stated on WP:SOCK. Further, I will say you cool off, disparaging me and my enforcement of the rules will not help your case. Gdo01 01:29, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Watching my every move is harassment, maybe not according to wikipedia but it is still harassment. I am very new at wikipedia and I make mistakes and people like you are not very helpful and are extremely annoying by stalking me. Just leave me alone Gdo01, stop stalking me, stop talking to me (Unless I vandalize something), and just leave me alone. I did not know you could not have more than one account, big deal, I am only 16 and very new at wikipedia but I get it now, so will you just leave me alone? Please? It would be much appreciated. User:Daniel Chiswick 9 May, 2007.

Alright, first of all, admins cannot "delete" user accounts. I can delete a user page/talk page if they comply with WP:CSD#U1 or if the user invokes the right to vanish as mentioned above. Second, I would not delete a user page/talk page under right to vanish if the user has a sockpuppet case pending, as is the case here (see the exceptions to the right to vanish). Finally, this conversation shouldn't be happening on my talk page. Please talk to each other. · jersyko talk 02:26, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Ellielancaster

I know I have been blocked but I was wondering if I wanted to upload articles on websites proving that chewing sugarfree gum is beneficial to oral health. I am not promoting any brands only the articles. Please can you confirm why these articles would have been removed ie, from Oral hygiene? UserEllielancaster