Misplaced Pages

Juice Plus: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:20, 13 May 2007 view source68.97.91.139 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 06:55, 13 May 2007 view source TraceyR (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers6,025 edits Undid revision 130462521 by 68.97.91.139 (talk)Next edit →
Line 65: Line 65:


As of 2007, no research had been published by the Foundation, but it does conduct an ongoing survey which seems to link Juice Plus consumption to a general improvement in diet and lifestyle habits. Critics, including the ] Wellness Letter and Dr. ] of MLMWatch, question the survey's scientific value, and state that the Foundation is being used mainly as a marketing gimmick to get families to buy Juice Plus products.<ref name=jpcrf>{{cite web | last =Barrett | first = Stephen | authorlink = Stephen Barrett | title =Questionable Research by the Juice Plus Children's Research Foundation | publisher = MLM Watch | date = | url =http://www.mlmwatch.org/04C/NSA/crf.html | accessdate = 2007-02-05}}</ref><ref name=ucbwl2>{{cite web | last = | first = | authorlink = | coauthors = | title = Juiced Up and Dried Out | work = | publisher = University of California Berkeley Wellness Letter | date = | url = http://www.berkeleywellness.com/html/ds/dsJuicePlus.php | format = pdf | doi = | accessdate = 2006-10-15}}</ref> As of 2007, no research had been published by the Foundation, but it does conduct an ongoing survey which seems to link Juice Plus consumption to a general improvement in diet and lifestyle habits. Critics, including the ] Wellness Letter and Dr. ] of MLMWatch, question the survey's scientific value, and state that the Foundation is being used mainly as a marketing gimmick to get families to buy Juice Plus products.<ref name=jpcrf>{{cite web | last =Barrett | first = Stephen | authorlink = Stephen Barrett | title =Questionable Research by the Juice Plus Children's Research Foundation | publisher = MLM Watch | date = | url =http://www.mlmwatch.org/04C/NSA/crf.html | accessdate = 2007-02-05}}</ref><ref name=ucbwl2>{{cite web | last = | first = | authorlink = | coauthors = | title = Juiced Up and Dried Out | work = | publisher = University of California Berkeley Wellness Letter | date = | url = http://www.berkeleywellness.com/html/ds/dsJuicePlus.php | format = pdf | doi = | accessdate = 2006-10-15}}</ref>

==Criticism==
According to '']'', in 2005, National Safety Associates used advertising featuring Dr. William Sears, which implied that Juice Plus Gummies are low in sugar and a nutritional alternative to fruits and vegetables. This claim resulted in consumer complaints to the ]'s National Advertising Division (NAD). The BBB issued a complaint that NSA's claims were misleading, and as a result, NSA promised to modify its ads and stop calling Gummies “the next best thing to fruits and vegetables”.<ref name=consumerreports>{{cite web | last = | first = | authorlink = | coauthors = | title = How Product Testimonials Bend The Rules | work = | publisher = '']'' | date = | url = http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/personal-finance/producttestimonialtricks-of-the-trade-106.htm | format = | doi = | accessdate = 2006-10-15}}</ref> However, as of 2007, the Juice Plus homepage still advertizes that the products are “the next best thing to fruits and vegetables”, though not specifically in reference to the Gummies.<ref name=jphome>{{cite web | last = | first = | authorlink = | coauthors = | title = Juice Plus homepage | work = | publisher = National Safety Associates | date = | url = http://www.juiceplus.com | format = | doi = | accessdate = 2006-10-15}}</ref>

Concerns have also been raised about the accuracy of product labeling. Three studies which included chemical analyses of Juice Plus have indicated nutrient amounts that differ from the amounts listed on the product labels.<ref Name=plotnick>; Corretti MC, Vogel RA, Hesslink, Jr. R, Wise JA. (2003). "" (pdf). ''J Am Coll Cardiol'' '''41''' (10): 1744-9.</ref><ref name=environmental> {{cite news | title=EN Squeezes the Raw Truth Out of Juice Plus Claims | date = March 2002 | publisher= Environmental Nutrition | url = http://www.environmentalnutrition.com/pub/25_3/asken/150372-1.html}}</ref><ref name=Consumerlab> {{cite news | title=Multivitamin/multimineral product review: ingredient comparison tables | date = 2006 | publisher= Consumer Lab}}</ref> An unpublished chemical analysis of Juice Plus reported by GNLD International, a competing supplement company, is claimed to have shown that Juice Plus Orchard/Garden Blend did not contain detectable levels of alpha-carotene, lycopene, or lutein.<ref name=GNLD> {{cite news | title = Are all antioxidants what they claim to be? | date = | publisher= GNLD International | url = http://ww1.gnld.com/pages/businessguide_cd1005/gnldbustools_web/content/pdf/YouDecide/2001/YouDecide_Feb_01.pdf | format = pdf}}</ref>

Doubts have been raised about the benefits of Juice Plus by the ], the ] and other critics. Specific criticisms include: the product’s marketing being unsupported by research data, the product contains too little fruit and vegetable powder to offer significant clinical benefits, concerns that the effects can be attributed to the inclusion of added ] vitamins and micronutrients, and complaints that the products are excessively priced relative to their potential benefits.<ref name=watzl>{{cite journal | author = Watzl, B. | coauthors=Bub, A. | yeacr = 2003 | title = Letter to the Editor:Fruit and Vegetable Concentrate or Vitamin Supplement? | journal = J Nutr | volume = 133 | issue = 7 | pages = 3725 | url = http://jn.nutrition.org/cgi/reprint/133/11/3725 | format = pdf}}</ref><ref name=mscc>{{cite web | last = | first = | authorlink = | coauthors = | title = Juice Plus| work = | publisher = Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center | date = | url = http://www.mskcc.org/mskcc/html/11571.cfm?RecordID=637&tab=HC | format = | doi = | accessdate = 2006-10-15}}</ref><ref name=ucbwl1>{{cite web | last = | first = | authorlink = | coauthors = | title = Juice Plus—and minus | work = | publisher = University of California Berkeley Wellness Letter | date = | url = http://www.berkeleywellness.com/subCorner/pdf/2000/0011.pdf | format = pdf | doi = | accessdate = 2006-10-15}}</ref><ref name=ucbwl2/><ref name=goodwin>{{cite web | last = Goodwin | first = Kathy | authorlink = | coauthors = | title = Dietary supplements: facts about Juice Plus | work = | publisher = The Diet Channel | date = | url = http://www.thedietchannel.com/Dietary-Supplements-Facts-About-Juice-Plus.htm | format = | doi = | accessdate = 2006-10-15}}</ref><ref name=stanton>{{cite journal | title = Nutrition: who can you believe?| author= | date = 2000 | journal = ]| volume=20 | issue=4 | pages= 23-7 | url = http://www.skeptics.com.au/journal/2000/4_nutrition.pdf}}</ref><ref name=mlmw2>{{cite web | last = Barrett| first = Stephen | authorlink = Stephen Barrett| coauthors = | title = Juice Plus: A Critical Look | work = | publisher = MLM Watch| date = | url = http://www.mlmwatch.org/04C/NSA/juiceplus.html | format = | doi = | accessdate = 2006-10-15}}</ref>

Juice Plus has drawn criticism as a result of connections with the now-bankrupt supplement company United Sciences of America, Inc. (USAI).<ref name=mlmw2/> Several of the research articles published on Juice Plus were authored by John A. Wise,<ref name=plotnick/><ref name=kiefer/><ref name=smith/><ref name=inserra/><ref name=wise/> who is the Chief Science Officer and a shareholder of the company that manufactures Juice Plus (Natural Alternatives International; NAI). Immediately prior to joining NAI in 1987, Wise had served as Executive vice-President of Research & Development for USAI. In October 1986, USAI was the subject of an expose produced by ], which revealed the company’s use of fraudulent scientific claims and deceptive advertising.<ref name=farley>{{cite journal | author = Farley, Dixie | year = 1987| title = The eyes of Texas were upon them - and FDA - United Sciences of America Inc | journal = FDA Consumer | volume = | issue = October | pages = | url = http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1370/is_v21/ai_5273121/pg_1 | format = }}</ref>
The FDA subsequently investigated USAI for pyramid-scheming, the use of false and misleading promotional materials, and for making prohibited disease treatment claims. Attorneys General in California, New York and Texas simultaneously filed lawsuits ordering USAI to change its marketing plan and sales claims. In response, USAI filed for bankruptcy and ceased operations in 1987, at which time John A. Wise began employment with NAI. USAI’s deceptive sales and marketing tactics were reviewed in several articles published in 1986-1987.<ref name=stare>{{cite journal | author = Stare, F.J. | coauthors=. | year = 1986 | title = Marketing a nutritional "revolutionary breakthrough". Trading on names. | journal = N Engl J Med | volume = 315 | issue = 15 | pages = 971-3 | url = | format = }}</ref><ref name=young>{{cite journal | author = Young, E.A. | coauthors= Schenker, S., Weser, E. | year = 1987 | title = United Sciences of America, Incorporated: an "optimal" diet? | journal = Ann Intern Med. | volume = 107 | issue = 1 | pages = 101-3 | url = | format = }}</ref><ref name=renner>{{cite journal | author = Renner, J.H. | coauthors= | year = 1986 | title = Science or scam? | journal = N Engl J Med | volume = 315 | issue = 15 | pages = 971 | url = | format = }}</ref><ref name=holden>{{cite journal | author = Holden, C. | coauthors= | year = 1986 | title = Scientists get flak over marketing plan | journal = Science | volume = 234 | issue = 4780 | pages = 1063-4 | url = | format = }}</ref><ref name=money>{{cite journal | author = | coauthors= | year = 1987 | title = USA: The strange rise and fall of one MLM | journal = Money | volume = | issue = June 1 | pages = | url = http://money.cnn.com/magazines/moneymag/moneymag_archive/1987/06/01/83881/index.htm | format = }}</ref>


== References == == References ==

Revision as of 06:55, 13 May 2007

Template:FoodboxJuice Plus is a branded line of dietary supplements containing concentrated fruit and vegetable juice extracts fortified with added vitamins and nutrients. Sold via direct or multi-level marketing, the supplements are advertised as "the next best thing to fruits and vegetables." Marketing claims made about Juice Plus products suggest that they can provide benefits such as reducing oxidative stress and promoting cardiovascular health. A few sources have argued that there is no scientific proof that Juice Plus offers significant health benefits, and that deceptive claims are used in the product's marketing information. Several studies which have set out to test the effects of Juice Plus have generated conflicting and controversial results.

Product description

Juice Plus is manufactured by Natural Alternatives International in San Marcos, CA and distributed by National Safety Associates (NSA; Collierville, TN) via direct or multi-level marketing. There are several Juice Plus products, with the primary ones being Orchard Blend and Garden Blend capsules, which are sold together in 4-month supplies at a cost, in 2007, of approximately $160 USD. NSA recommends consumption of four capsules per day (see infobox at right for nutrient breakdown).

Product research

Juice Plus is marketed as a dietary supplement that can provide some of the nutritional benefits of fruits and vegetables; however, multiple studies of varying standards have produced conflicting results as to the truth of these claims.

The products examined in the majority of the studies were Garden Blend and Orchard Blend; two studies were performed on Vineyard Blend taken in combination with Garden and Orchard Blend, and one study was on Juice Plus Gummies.

Nutrient absorption

Though Juice Plus contains some nutrients, concerns have been raised that these nutrients may not be bioavailable, meaning not effectively absorbed by the human body, and that some of the nutrients claimed to be in the products may not be present in significant amounts. Studies on nutrient absorption showed that subjects taking Juice Plus had elevated blood levels of folate and beta-carotene but the effects on blood levels of vitamin E and vitamin C were inconsistent. Some studies have shown significant increases in vitamin E and C levels, while other studies have shown much weaker effects on vitamin E and C levels, and that the levels of the two vitamins are not significantly increased. Studies have also found that Juice Plus does not raise the blood levels of other key phytonutrients from fresh fruits and vegetables, such as lycopene, lutein, zeaxanthin, and beta-cryptoxanthin.

Antioxidant activity

NSA claims that Juice Plus is an effective antioxidant, and quotes a study, funded by the manufacturer, which showed a 75% reduction in lipid peroxidation (an oxidative stress marker) after 7 to 28 days. Other studies sponsored by the manufacturer have also reported reductions in lipid peroxidation and DNA oxidation. These studies were not blinded or placebo-controlled, included few participants (in one case no more than 15), and did not include monitoring or control of the participants' food intake. One such study was criticized as “a particularly poor study” by Rosemary Stanton in the Australian journal, The Skeptic.

Three other studies which were conducted under more rigorous conditions, meaning randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies, longer in duration and with more subjects, found no significant reductions in lipid peroxidation, DNA oxidation, or other markers of oxidative stress.

One study, which used an in vitro test of antioxidant activity, found that 1 g of Juice Plus Garden Blend/Orchard Blend powder had the corresponding antioxidant capacity to approximately 10 g (fresh weight) of fruit or vegetable, amounting to 30 g (roughly one-third of a serving) per 4 capsules.

One placebo-controlled study conducted in 2002 found that Juice Plus Gummie candies did not significantly improve the antioxidant status of children, as indicated by negative results from 6 different antioxidant tests. The authors explained this by saying it was possible that the supplement did not contain enough of the proper antioxidants to make a significant difference or that the antioxidants extracted in the fruit/vegetable extract were not bioavailable.

Cardiovascular effects

Several studies have examined the effects of Juice Plus capsules on biochemical parameters associated with cardiovascular function, again with conflicting results.

One non-controlled study found a 37% decrease in homocysteine levels.

Other more rigorous studies, including two that were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, found that homocysteine levels were not reduced or were reduced only marginally (7%).

Two randomized, double-blind placebo controlled studies have examined the effect of Juice Plus on serum cholesterol and LDL levels. One study found that Juice Plus had no significant effects; the other found slight decreases in cholesterol (6%) and LDL (9%) in subjects that took Orchard/Garden Blend, but no reductions among subjects who took Juice Plus Vineyard blend in addition.

One study found that Juice Plus had no effect on blood pressure in healthy subjects. This study also reported that a combined regimen of Juice Plus Orchard Blend and Garden Blend significantly decreased the impairment of brachial artery vasoactivity caused by a high-fat meal; however, the addition of Vineyard Blend to this regimen had no additional effect on brachial artery vasoactivity and led to an increase in total and low-density lipoprotein.

Adverse effects

Since Juice Plus is not regulated as a drug, information on adverse effects has not been collected through a systematic monitoring program imposed by any national regulatory agency. However some adverse effects were reported in two studies on Juice Plus. In one of the studies, subjects who took Orchard Blend and Garden Blend developed a hive-like rash. Another study reported adverse effects (upper-respiratory tract, urinary, and musculoskeletal) in roughly a third of the participants who took the products for 7 days. These events resolved spontaneously and were deemed by the researchers to be unrelated to treatment.

Other adverse effects listed in the Juice Plus Franchise Owner's Manual and the Special Nutritional Adverse Event Monitoring System include gastrointestinal cramps, fever, nausea, bloating, diarrhea, and constipation. Heartburn, abdominal pain, diarrhea, gas with foul odor, and indigestion have been noted as very common risks associated with taking Juice Plus Orchard and Garden Blend, and nausea and vomiting as less common risks; in some cases these side effects may be serious and long lasting, persisting after use of the supplement has been stopped.

Juice Plus Children's Research Foundation

The Juice Plus Children's Research Foundation, founded in 1997, is a non-profit organization whose stated goal is to initiate and/or support programs that advance the principle that improved nutrition leads to healthier lifestyle and overall better health in children. The foundation is chaired by executives of National Safety Associates and operates from the company's head office in Collierville, Tennessee.

As of 2007, no research had been published by the Foundation, but it does conduct an ongoing survey which seems to link Juice Plus consumption to a general improvement in diet and lifestyle habits. Critics, including the University of California Berkeley Wellness Letter and Dr. Stephen Barrett of MLMWatch, question the survey's scientific value, and state that the Foundation is being used mainly as a marketing gimmick to get families to buy Juice Plus products.

Criticism

According to Consumer Reports, in 2005, National Safety Associates used advertising featuring Dr. William Sears, which implied that Juice Plus Gummies are low in sugar and a nutritional alternative to fruits and vegetables. This claim resulted in consumer complaints to the Better Business Bureau's National Advertising Division (NAD). The BBB issued a complaint that NSA's claims were misleading, and as a result, NSA promised to modify its ads and stop calling Gummies “the next best thing to fruits and vegetables”. However, as of 2007, the Juice Plus homepage still advertizes that the products are “the next best thing to fruits and vegetables”, though not specifically in reference to the Gummies.

Concerns have also been raised about the accuracy of product labeling. Three studies which included chemical analyses of Juice Plus have indicated nutrient amounts that differ from the amounts listed on the product labels. An unpublished chemical analysis of Juice Plus reported by GNLD International, a competing supplement company, is claimed to have shown that Juice Plus Orchard/Garden Blend did not contain detectable levels of alpha-carotene, lycopene, or lutein.

Doubts have been raised about the benefits of Juice Plus by the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, the University of California Berkeley and other critics. Specific criticisms include: the product’s marketing being unsupported by research data, the product contains too little fruit and vegetable powder to offer significant clinical benefits, concerns that the effects can be attributed to the inclusion of added exogenous vitamins and micronutrients, and complaints that the products are excessively priced relative to their potential benefits.

Juice Plus has drawn criticism as a result of connections with the now-bankrupt supplement company United Sciences of America, Inc. (USAI). Several of the research articles published on Juice Plus were authored by John A. Wise, who is the Chief Science Officer and a shareholder of the company that manufactures Juice Plus (Natural Alternatives International; NAI). Immediately prior to joining NAI in 1987, Wise had served as Executive vice-President of Research & Development for USAI. In October 1986, USAI was the subject of an expose produced by NBC, which revealed the company’s use of fraudulent scientific claims and deceptive advertising. The FDA subsequently investigated USAI for pyramid-scheming, the use of false and misleading promotional materials, and for making prohibited disease treatment claims. Attorneys General in California, New York and Texas simultaneously filed lawsuits ordering USAI to change its marketing plan and sales claims. In response, USAI filed for bankruptcy and ceased operations in 1987, at which time John A. Wise began employment with NAI. USAI’s deceptive sales and marketing tactics were reviewed in several articles published in 1986-1987.

References

  1. ^ "Juice Plus homepage". National Safety Associates. Retrieved 2006-10-15. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  2. ^ Plotnick, Gary; Corretti MC, Vogel RA, Hesslink, Jr. R, Wise JA. (2003). "Effect of supplemental phytonutrients on impairment of the flow-mediated brachial artery vasoactivity after a single high-fat meal" (pdf). J Am Coll Cardiol 41 (10): 1744-9.
  3. ^ Nantz MP, Rowe CA, Nieves C Jr, Percival SS. (2006). "Immunity and antioxidant capacity in humans is enhanced by consumption of a dried, encapsulated fruit and vegetable juice concentrate". J Nutr. 136: 2606–10.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  4. ^ Stewart, R.J.; et al. (2002). "Antioxidant status of young children: Response to an antioxidant supplement". J Am Diet Association. 102 (11): 1652–7. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  5. ^ Watzl, B. "Letter to the Editor:Fruit and Vegetable Concentrate or Vitamin Supplement?" (pdf). J Nutr. 133 (7): 3725. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |yeacr= ignored (help)
  6. ^ Kiefer I, Prock P, Lawrence C, Wise J, Bieger W, Bayer P, Rathmanner T, Kunze M, Rieder A (2004). "Supplementation with mixed fruit and vegetable juice concentrates increased serum antioxidants and folate in healthy adults" (pdf). J Am Coll Nutr. 23 (3): 205–11.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  7. ^ Smith MJ, Inserra PF, Watson RR, Wise JA, O'Neill KL (1999). "Supplementation with fruit and vegetable extracts may decrease DNA damage in the peripheral lymphocytes of an elderly population". Nutr Res. 19 (10): 1507–18.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  8. ^ Samman S.; et al. (2003). "A mixed fruit and vegetable concentrate increases plasma antioxidant vitamins and folate and lowers plasma homocysteine in men" (pdf). J Nutr. 133 (7): 2188–93. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)
  9. ^ Cite error: The named reference wise was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  10. ^ Leeds AR; et al. (2000). "Availability of micronutrients from dried, encapsulated fruit and vegetable preparations: a study in healthy volunteers". J Hum Nutr Diet. 13: 21–7. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)
  11. ^ Bloomer RJ; et al. (2006). "Oxidative stress response to aerobic exercise: comparison of antioxidant supplements". Med Sci Sports Exerc. 38: 1098–1105. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)
  12. ^ Inserra PF, Jiang S, Solkoff D, Lee J, Zhang Z, Xu M, Hesslink R, Wise J, Watson RR (1999). "Immune function in elderly smokers and nonsmokers improves during supplementation with fruit and vegetable extracts". Integr Med. 2 (1): 3–10.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  13. ^ Stanton R (2000). "Nutrition: who can you believe?" (PDF). The Skeptic. 20 (4): 23–7. {{cite journal}}: External link in |author= (help)CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  14. ^ Bamonti F; et al. (2006). "Increased free malondialdehyde concentrations in smokers normalise with a mixed fruit and vegetable juice concentrate: a pilot study". Clin Chem Lab Med. 44 (4): 391–6. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)
  15. Chambers SJ; et al. (1996). "Evaluation of the antioxidant properties of a methanolic extract from 'Juice Plus fruit' and 'Juice Plus vegetable' (dietary supplements)". Food Chem. 57: 271–274. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)
  16. Panunzio MF; et al. (2003). "Supplementation with fruit and vegetable concentrate decreases plasma homocysteine levels in a dietary controlled trial". Nutr Res. 23: 1221–8. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)
  17. Freedman JE. (2003). "High-fat diets and cardiovascular disease. Are nutritional supplements useful?" (pdf). J Am Coll Cardiol. 41: 1750–2.
  18. Virtual Franchise Owner's Manual (December 2002). National Safety Associates. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  19. "FDA SN/AEMS Web Report". U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 1998-10-20. Retrieved 2006-10-15. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  20. "CCCWFU #60A02 Protocol Amendment #12" (PDF). Institutional Review Board, Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University. 2006-19-17. Retrieved 2007-02-11. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  21. "Juice Plus Children's Research Foundation homepage". National Safety Associates. Retrieved 2006-10-15. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  22. Barrett, Stephen. "Questionable Research by the Juice Plus Children's Research Foundation". MLM Watch. Retrieved 2007-02-05.
  23. ^ "Juiced Up and Dried Out" (pdf). University of California Berkeley Wellness Letter. Retrieved 2006-10-15. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  24. "How Product Testimonials Bend The Rules". Consumer Reports. Retrieved 2006-10-15. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  25. "EN Squeezes the Raw Truth Out of Juice Plus Claims". Environmental Nutrition. March 2002.
  26. "Multivitamin/multimineral product review: ingredient comparison tables". Consumer Lab. 2006.
  27. "Are all antioxidants what they claim to be?" (pdf). GNLD International.
  28. "Juice Plus". Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Retrieved 2006-10-15. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  29. "Juice Plus—and minus" (pdf). University of California Berkeley Wellness Letter. Retrieved 2006-10-15. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  30. Goodwin, Kathy. "Dietary supplements: facts about Juice Plus". The Diet Channel. Retrieved 2006-10-15. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  31. ^ Barrett, Stephen. "Juice Plus: A Critical Look". MLM Watch. Retrieved 2006-10-15. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  32. Farley, Dixie (1987). "The eyes of Texas were upon them - and FDA - United Sciences of America Inc". FDA Consumer (October).
  33. Stare, F.J. (1986). "Marketing a nutritional "revolutionary breakthrough". Trading on names". N Engl J Med. 315 (15): 971–3. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  34. Young, E.A. (1987). "United Sciences of America, Incorporated: an "optimal" diet?". Ann Intern Med. 107 (1): 101–3. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  35. Renner, J.H. (1986). "Science or scam?". N Engl J Med. 315 (15): 971. {{cite journal}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  36. Holden, C. (1986). "Scientists get flak over marketing plan". Science. 234 (4780): 1063–4. {{cite journal}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  37. "USA: The strange rise and fall of one MLM". Money (June 1). 1987. {{cite journal}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
Category: