Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 21:21, 16 May 2007

Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.

Crash the block and sockpuppet issue like airplane crashing@! (This is just for joke or ha-ha... for who think me as bad vandals.) (Seriously, IT's JOKE!)

See also

User_talk:AirFrance358/archive1

User:Nlu, can you please not be rude...?

I'm sorry.., but many users express in that way....(also, as stated, why my attitude got little angry, is because you seems to be one-sided. I'm sorry about my attitude, however, you should not say you seem... blah blah. I'm just giving suggestion since problem is not solving. How good idea the suggestion is! It all benefits all users by solving conflicts by using evidences! I'm not trying to be one-sided. Also, I admit that Mohe is not Korean history, although it interfere with Koreans. It has no conflicts because of many evidences in the articles stating. So, this can NOTNOTNOT be case for this Balhae article. OK? --AirFrance358 22:33, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Since, many texts in here are outdated, now, making clean-up(Or achiving.) (Is there any archive bot or template?)

Did you see what I just wrote about don't delete comments? And then you deleted a bunch.

Yes archiving is OK, but archiving is not the same as deleting. Please see Misplaced Pages:How to archive a talk page. —dgies_c 20:56, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did to User:Gabeyc, you will be blocked from editing. Clicketyclack 21:24, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Case over. Simply block. OVER. SO-CALLED VANDALISM IS STOPPED. CONTESTS CONTINUE FOREVER FOREVER FOREVER UNTIL SOMEONE GIVES UP. --AirFrance358 03:02, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Blocked

If you feel this block is not justified, you may: (1) email me by clicking here, or otherwise at anthony.cfc@gmail.com; (2) add the text {{unblock|reason}} to your talk page, which you can still edit.

Blocks at Misplaced Pages are not a punishment - rather, they are a period to reflect, an opportunity to show understanding and and ability to act responsibly, and a period of time to let the matter pass and be learned from. Wikipedians, Administrators and the Community have a real desire for everyone who is capable of acting responsibly to be able to enjoy editing; please bear this in mind for the duration of your block.

Block extended

Your block has been extended to one month due to your continued vandalism. Any more and this page will be protected from your edits. --Yamla 22:49, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Do not agree with your saying of vandalism. Thanks. Also, this is MY PAGE!--AirFrance358 00:34, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

No, this is not your page; it is Misplaced Pages content licensed under the GFDL. You do not own it. Its purpose is to provide support and a method of communication between your account and other members of the project. --Kinu /_c 04:26, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

That's not I try to say.. It was normal protests. --AirFrance358 21:09, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

AirFrance358 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Will stop doing that. Or if you are in doubt of my actions, protect the suspected sockpuppet pages. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Will stop doing that. Or if you are in doubt of my actions, protect the suspected sockpuppet pages. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Will stop doing that. Or if you are in doubt of my actions, protect the suspected sockpuppet pages. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

You were warned not to interfere with those tags, it was explained why you shouldn't, how you could contest them on WP:ANI, and that you would be blocked if you continued. You did it and were blocked. Right after that block expired, you did it again. —dgies_c 02:14, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

OK, then. I will stop. But I will keep contesting. (I didn't think that many people are that serious... I am great joke maker, sometimes...) --AirFrance358 02:56, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Also, I think one person blocked me and then again one person blocked me more..? --AirFrance358 02:56, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Question:Why can we play with our user page or discussion page? Yes, I know this is discussion page, but because of many blocks,well, sorry about that.. (It's purely joke most of time except the case of Nlu, but...). --AirFrance358 02:58, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

The reason..

The reason why I wrote something in talk page is because even my user page is blocked to edit.

Hey...

Also, I DID CONTRIBUTE POSTIVELY TO WIKIPEIDA. I DIDN'T NEGATIVELY TOUCH WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE! IT IS ONLY USER PAGE. DOES IT MATTER TO WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE. ALSO, I NOW STOPPED AND DECIDED TO IGNORE THE TAG OF SOCKPUPPET. One thing to say: Also, suspected sockpuppets of me is actually worker(member) who works for (Sudbury) History Correction Association. You could say they are sockpuppets, since working and sharing same opinion could be sockpuppet behavior. However, technically, no.

• Requests for unblock