| Revision as of 20:26, 5 April 2005 editFrancisTyers (talk | contribs)13,802 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:42, 3 May 2005 edit undoとある白い猫 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers55,796 edits →Edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| :No problem, I normally do it, unless the change is really trivial or i forget, just check that page yourself, i summarise more often than not ;) ] 20:26, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC) | :No problem, I normally do it, unless the change is really trivial or i forget, just check that page yourself, i summarise more often than not ;) ] 20:26, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC) | ||
| ==Bad timing :) == | |||
| Well I have been writing the article from scratch. I actualy have "proof" via numerious webpages which I added before writing the article, I had taken a sleap break though. I welcome any productive contribution, Id prefer to finish my version first though, often I am quoting the web sites I provided. There isnt much I can say about PKK that is pleasant. --] ] 05:42, 3 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:42, 3 May 2005
Redirect
See to see how to make an automated redirect, and read about all the details about Misplaced Pages:Redirects if you want to know more. Thanks for editing, and feel free to let me know if you have any questions. Tuf-Kat 19:22, Dec 25, 2004 (UTC)
- Just to clarify, click on the link I provided and then "edit this page". You have to type #redirect ] to make a redirect. Tuf-Kat 19:23, Dec 25, 2004 (UTC)
Thanks :) -- FrancisTyers 19:32, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Anarcho Punk Ideology
Thanks for making a contribution to this page. I think you are the first to make an actual contribution to the content of the article (other than spelling corrections, etc.) other than me :)
Hey man, no problem :) -- FrancisTyers 00:36, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Edit summary
Dear contributor, first I would like to say a big thank you for your time, care, and enthusiasm in editing Misplaced Pages articles. I hope you find it just as much fun as I do.
I am writing with a small suggestion. I wonder if you could write an edit summary every time you make changes to an article (or when you start a new one). Even a short summary helps. To see how often you have done so in the past, you may go to http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special:Contributions&target=YOUR USERNAME.
Edit summaries are important for a number of reasons. Every time you change an article, a record of that change propagates to every single person who has that article on their watchlist. Most people have an article on their watchlist because they care a lot about it, so they would like to be informed about what is going on with it. Accurate summaries help people decide whether it is worthwhile for them to check a change. This is why your edit summary, which will take you maybe 15 seconds, is a time-saver and a great act of candor to the other people interested in the same article as you. Accurate edit summaries are important because they create trust regarding your contributions and help resolve disputes.
There are other, very convincing reasons for putting an edit summary. More information is available at Misplaced Pages:Edit summary. If at any point you have any questions about this rule (or anything else for that matter), please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you and happy editing! Hyacinth 20:24, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- No problem, I normally do it, unless the change is really trivial or i forget, just check that page yourself, i summarise more often than not ;) FrancisTyers 20:26, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Bad timing :)
Well I have been writing the article from scratch. I actualy have "proof" via numerious webpages which I added before writing the article, I had taken a sleap break though. I welcome any productive contribution, Id prefer to finish my version first though, often I am quoting the web sites I provided. There isnt much I can say about PKK that is pleasant. --Cool Cat 05:42, 3 May 2005 (UTC)