| Revision as of 00:52, 21 May 2007 edit65.0.55.142 (talk) ←Blanked the page← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:53, 21 May 2007 edit undoShadowlynk (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers17,142 edits Revert to revision 132334901 dated 2007-05-21 00:49:30 by TeaDrinker using popupsNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{wikibreak|Tawker}} | |||
| Ok, ''the bot'' takes care of almost everything I do, I'm swamped with work right now. I'm outta here. If you need anything urgent, email me. -- ] 01:03, 9 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| {| class="messagebox" style="background: AntiqueWhite;" | |||
| |This talk page is '''automatically archived''' by Werdnabot. Any sections older than '''5''' days are automatically archived to ''']'''. Sections without timestamps are not archived | |||
| |- | |||
| |}<!-- BEGIN WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE --><!-- This page is automatically archived by Werdnabot-->{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--This is an empty template, but transcluding it counts as a link, meaning Werdnabot is directed to this page - DO NOT SUBST IT --><!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-5 DoUnreplied-Yes Target-User talk:Tawker/(!month)07--><!--END WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE--> | |||
| Archives (by month) @ ] | |||
| ==Removal of template acknowledging source of imported material== | |||
| Please see ]. I see that a dozen or more pages had that acknowledgment removed "per Danny". A violation of license, on the face of it. ] 18 Feb 2007 | |||
| == Master Nan == | |||
| I assume you are the one who deleted the article on Master Nan. I can't understand why you did that as the sources were cited and corrections were made to avoid copyright infringement. Moreover, at the time the only tag on the article was for the article to be cleaned up. All I did was try to reiterate some facts on a famous buddhist scholar and all the work put into it has been deleted in a flash and without warning. I cannot claim to be tech savvy enough to know whether you are directly responsible, but if so, it makes unfamiliar and new contributors like myself have a strong sense of distaste that there is not even the chance for correction. What's the point of trying to establish an article if it keeps on getting deleted before it's done. If you could please give specific reasons why it was deleted as the article was rewritten to avoid copyright infringement. | |||
Revision as of 00:53, 21 May 2007
 | Tawker is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Misplaced Pages soon. |
Ok, the bot takes care of almost everything I do, I'm swamped with work right now. I'm outta here. If you need anything urgent, email me. -- Tawker 01:03, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
| This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 5 days are automatically archived to User talk:Tawker/Dec07. Sections without timestamps are not archived |
Archives (by month) @ User talk:Tawker/Archives
Removal of template acknowledging source of imported material
Please see Template talk:EnPW. I see that a dozen or more pages had that acknowledgment removed "per Danny". A violation of license, on the face of it. Robin Patterson 18 Feb 2007
Master Nan
I assume you are the one who deleted the article on Master Nan. I can't understand why you did that as the sources were cited and corrections were made to avoid copyright infringement. Moreover, at the time the only tag on the article was for the article to be cleaned up. All I did was try to reiterate some facts on a famous buddhist scholar and all the work put into it has been deleted in a flash and without warning. I cannot claim to be tech savvy enough to know whether you are directly responsible, but if so, it makes unfamiliar and new contributors like myself have a strong sense of distaste that there is not even the chance for correction. What's the point of trying to establish an article if it keeps on getting deleted before it's done. If you could please give specific reasons why it was deleted as the article was rewritten to avoid copyright infringement.