| Revision as of 17:26, 21 May 2007 editThatcher (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users28,287 edits RFAR← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:25, 21 May 2007 edit undoInkSplotch (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users821 edits →RFARNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| I really can't see the point of trying to open up a separate vote to decline the case. Jeff can withdraw his complaint, or the clerks will remove it, probably after 5 days unless additional arbitrators show interest. If jeff is waiting for some formality before filing an RFC then anyone else who was involved in the dispute can open the RFC instead. ] 17:26, 21 May 2007 (UTC) | I really can't see the point of trying to open up a separate vote to decline the case. Jeff can withdraw his complaint, or the clerks will remove it, probably after 5 days unless additional arbitrators show interest. If jeff is waiting for some formality before filing an RFC then anyone else who was involved in the dispute can open the RFC instead. ] 17:26, 21 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :I probably should have provided some diff's, but on his own talk page Jeff has indicated he won't act on an RFC until the case is formally rejected. He indicates he believes RFC to be a waste of time. I'm not sure anyone else is motivated enough to start one, so I proffered the motion to formally reject the case now to move things along. My feelings are that 10 days from now, if Jeff starts his case he won't get as much comments as he might now. If it goes his way, the article will get recreated, which will cause those who missed the RfC to react, redelete (or go back to AfD) and start everything all over again. Or it won't go his way, and he'll take it back to RFAr....either way, I suspect it would be back to arbcom before July. | |||
| :My hope, and it might be a naive one, is if this one actually hits RFC soon while many people are still talking about it we might hammer something out...or at least if it does bounce back to arbcom, it'll be an easier case to manage. It could just be my failing, I keep thinking if people would just talk it all out while it's fresh, peace could be found. I haven't got a good track record with that philosophy. --] 18:25, 21 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:25, 21 May 2007
RFAR
I really can't see the point of trying to open up a separate vote to decline the case. Jeff can withdraw his complaint, or the clerks will remove it, probably after 5 days unless additional arbitrators show interest. If jeff is waiting for some formality before filing an RFC then anyone else who was involved in the dispute can open the RFC instead. Thatcher131 17:26, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- I probably should have provided some diff's, but on his own talk page Jeff has indicated he won't act on an RFC until the case is formally rejected. He indicates he believes RFC to be a waste of time. I'm not sure anyone else is motivated enough to start one, so I proffered the motion to formally reject the case now to move things along. My feelings are that 10 days from now, if Jeff starts his case he won't get as much comments as he might now. If it goes his way, the article will get recreated, which will cause those who missed the RfC to react, redelete (or go back to AfD) and start everything all over again. Or it won't go his way, and he'll take it back to RFAr....either way, I suspect it would be back to arbcom before July.
- My hope, and it might be a naive one, is if this one actually hits RFC soon while many people are still talking about it we might hammer something out...or at least if it does bounce back to arbcom, it'll be an easier case to manage. It could just be my failing, I keep thinking if people would just talk it all out while it's fresh, peace could be found. I haven't got a good track record with that philosophy. --InkSplotch 18:25, 21 May 2007 (UTC)