| Revision as of 23:50, 22 May 2007 editVintagekits (talk | contribs)22,333 edits →[]: add sure← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:54, 22 May 2007 edit undoThe Random Editor (talk | contribs)6,156 edits →[]: DeleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| *'''Keep'''. Its membership makes it notable. - ]<small>]</small> 23:44, 22 May 2007 (UTC) | *'''Keep'''. Its membership makes it notable. - ]<small>]</small> 23:44, 22 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :'''Comment''' - no comment!--] 23:49, 22 May 2007 (UTC) | :'''Comment''' - no comment!--] 23:49, 22 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' Per Kittybrewster. --'''<font face="Kristen ITC">]''' <sup><font color="Olive">]</font></sup></font> 23:54, 22 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:54, 22 May 2007
Hereditary Peerage Association
- Hereditary Peerage Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Obscure, non-notable substub on tiny UK pressure group that seems to exist largely only as a website. I did try and discuss the notability but was basically told to did it myself if I wanted notability porven!. This society reminds me a lot of the Federal Commonwealth Society and I am sure those same editors who have WP:COI issues will turn up here. I would prefer if the wiki community that is not conflicted would determine the notability. Additonally there are only 10 ghits for the association, some of which are for its own webpage.Vintagekits 23:19, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Its membership makes it notable. - Kittybrewster (talk) 23:44, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - no comment!--Vintagekits 23:49, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Per Kittybrewster. --Random 23:54, 22 May 2007 (UTC)