| Revision as of 23:37, 22 May 2007 editKittybrewster (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers45,052 edits →AfD nomination of []← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:48, 23 May 2007 edit undoMrDarcy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,666 edits ThanksNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| BTW I've removed ] from ] - since he's a fictional character, I don't think you can claim him... As far as I'm aware he wasn't based on a real Arbuthnot so there doesn't seem to be a link that way<font face="Trebuchet MS"> — ] ]</font> 23:35, 22 May 2007 (UTC) | BTW I've removed ] from ] - since he's a fictional character, I don't think you can claim him... As far as I'm aware he wasn't based on a real Arbuthnot so there doesn't seem to be a link that way<font face="Trebuchet MS"> — ] ]</font> 23:35, 22 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :No, he was based on ]. - ]<small>]</small> 23:37, 22 May 2007 (UTC) | :No, he was based on ]. - ]<small>]</small> 23:37, 22 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == Thanks == | |||
| I appreciate your email, and agree with your position. I have blocked Vintagekits 48 hours, given the severity of the attack and the fact that he has been blocked thrice previously (all in this calendar year) for violating ]. My request to you is that you refrain from responding in any way - please just let it go so the issue doesn't escalate. | ] <small>]</small> 02:48, 23 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:48, 23 May 2007
AfD nomination of Terence John Arbuthnot
An article that you have been involved in editing, Terence John Arbuthnot, has been listed by me for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Terence John Arbuthnot (2nd nomination). Thank you. — iridescenti (talk to me!) 23:02, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Further to the automated message, this is not sniping at you - be aware that I did !vote "keep" on the last Arbuthnot - but this is nominated for technical reasons as I'm unable to find sources for the decoration. As I say on the discussion, if you can provide a source for it consider the nomination withdrawn. I appreciate that it wasn't you who added the offending information in this particular case so you may not know where Phoe found it but hopefully it's listed somewhere — iridescenti (talk to me!) 23:05, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- I do not regard you as invariably antagonistic towards articles I have created or contributed towards. You weigh things in the balance perfectly reasonably. No problem on that score. Furthermore you are civil. And you advised me of the afd. The source of the Order of Leopold of Belgium is Burke's Peerage - which I have just looked in, in order to verify it. - Kittybrewster (talk)
- Unfortunately someone's now put a delete on it, which means by arcane Misplaced Pages rules I can't now withdraw it unless/until they change their mind, but I'll leave a note that (assuming that is what the Burke's entry says - someone will need to check as otherwise the usual suspects may claim you made it up) I have no problem with an admin speedy-closing as keep — iridescenti (talk to me!) 23:21, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
BTW I've removed Sandy Arbuthnot from Category:Arbuthnot family - since he's a fictional character, I don't think you can claim him... As far as I'm aware he wasn't based on a real Arbuthnot so there doesn't seem to be a link that way — iridescenti (talk to me!) 23:35, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- No, he was based on Aubrey Herbert. - Kittybrewster (talk) 23:37, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
I appreciate your email, and agree with your position. I have blocked Vintagekits 48 hours, given the severity of the attack and the fact that he has been blocked thrice previously (all in this calendar year) for violating WP:NPA. My request to you is that you refrain from responding in any way - please just let it go so the issue doesn't escalate. | Mr. Darcy talk 02:48, 23 May 2007 (UTC)