| Revision as of 16:22, 18 May 2007 editBjrobinson (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users774 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:49, 23 May 2007 edit undoBjrobinson (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users774 edits ←Replaced page with 'Portal:Planning ... but how...' | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| ... but how... | ... but how... | ||
| ==Brain Splurge== | |||
| There is now ‘’very’’ little left of the previously interesting and quite informative category ]. This massacre has been of pretty epic proportions, I believe it used to include about 50 odd pages, and has now been reduced to during my 3pm tea break romps around WP at work, I often stumble across similar categories which err on the popular side of culture rather than any sciences… a few of them are heading for exactly the same fate, one in particular has 170 Articles, i | |||
| The problem is, to be mentioned in ‘verifiable’, or ‘third party’ sources, browser games have to be much more than ‘notable’ they have to be positively ‘significant’ within the context of their peers. As we have discussed over | |||
| Lets consider Inselkampf a game with an interesting and significant community, which makes it onto the front page of Digg, has real world currency spent upon it, | |||
| Cybernations is another good example of a game which is ‘’clearly’’ notable | |||
| To summarise what we have discussed over the last few weeks | |||
| What is to be done? Someone | |||
Latest revision as of 15:49, 23 May 2007
... but how...