| Revision as of 01:01, 25 May 2007 view sourceElonka (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators70,958 edits Query← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:08, 25 May 2007 view source CO (talk | contribs)11,199 edits →Juice PlusNext edit → | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| ==Juice Plus== | ==Juice Plus== | ||
| Erm, I'm a bit confused by your revert at ]? I agree that Misplaced Pages is not a democracy, but we have a situation where every single editor on the talkpage is against the inclusion of that "Adverse Effects" section, and the only editor who wants it, is {{user|Rhode Island Red}}, who has clear ] issues (just look at his contribs). I agree that Matthew's comments were out of line, but that doesn't change the fact of talkpage consensus. --]]] 01:01, 25 May 2007 (UTC) | Erm, I'm a bit confused by your revert at ]? I agree that Misplaced Pages is not a democracy, but we have a situation where every single editor on the talkpage is against the inclusion of that "Adverse Effects" section, and the only editor who wants it, is {{user|Rhode Island Red}}, who has clear ] issues (just look at his contribs). I agree that Matthew's comments were out of line, but that doesn't change the fact of talkpage consensus. --]]] 01:01, 25 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :I reverted the article because the information was cited. I would rather have information that is cited left up on the article page then no information at all. I really don't care about the outcome of the article, except that the information is cited. Their is no reason to remove cited information. If you would like you may revert back to the version before mine; I have no problems with that. Just remember ] and ]. I will leave this article up to the the Mediation council, to the editors working on this article, and to the admins to sort everything out. Thanks! --]<sub>]</sub> 01:08, 25 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:08, 25 May 2007
User:Wikihermit/Talkpagedesign
 Archives |
Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Wikihermit! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand 04:17, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Elk River Suicide Rates
In the school section in the Elk River, Minnesota article, you put:
"Elk River High School has the highest suicide rate of all high schools in Minnesota."
Maybe I'm just blind, but I don't see any mention of the suicide rates for Elk River in any of those references. I tried googling it, but came up with nothing. Where did you get this information? --Ouzo 20:05, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk page
Hi. I noticed that you transcluded or substituted a template to respond to or notify a regular editor with whom you disagree. The main purpose of many of these templates is to inform the receiver of policy (e.g., that there is a numerical limit to reversion on content of an article within a time period, that personal attacks or vandalism can result in a block, that they can edit a page constructively without permission, etc.) It is likely that this editor knows this, and if he or she has breached or ignored these, please respond with a personal message. Thanks! -- Matthew
GAC backlog elimination drive
This form message is being sent to you either due to your membership with WikiProject Good Articles and/or your inclusion on the Misplaced Pages:Good article candidates/List of reviewers. A new drive has been started requesting that all members review at least one article (or more, if you wish!) within the next two weeks at GAC to help in removing the large backlog. This message is being sent to all members, and even members who have been recently reviewing articles. There are almost 130 members in this project and about 180 articles that currently need to be reviewed. If each member helps to review just one or two articles, the majority of the backlog will be cleared. Since the potential amount of reviewers may significantly increase, please make sure to add :{{GAReview}} underneath the article you are reviewing to ensure that only one person is reviewing each article. Additionally, the GA criteria may have been modified since your last review, so look over the criteria again to help you to determine if a candidate is GA-worthy. If you have any questions about this drive or the review process, leave a message on the GAC talk page. --Nehrams2020 00:40, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Juice Plus
Erm, I'm a bit confused by your revert at Juice Plus? I agree that Misplaced Pages is not a democracy, but we have a situation where every single editor on the talkpage is against the inclusion of that "Adverse Effects" section, and the only editor who wants it, is Rhode Island Red (talk · contribs), who has clear WP:OWN issues (just look at his contribs). I agree that Matthew's comments were out of line, but that doesn't change the fact of talkpage consensus. --Elonka 01:01, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- I reverted the article because the information was cited. I would rather have information that is cited left up on the article page then no information at all. I really don't care about the outcome of the article, except that the information is cited. Their is no reason to remove cited information. If you would like you may revert back to the version before mine; I have no problems with that. Just remember WP:V and WP:CITE. I will leave this article up to the the Mediation council, to the editors working on this article, and to the admins to sort everything out. Thanks! --TTalk to me 01:08, 25 May 2007 (UTC)