Misplaced Pages

Talk:0.999...: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:38, 6 May 2005 editBradBeattie (talk | contribs)6,888 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 20:46, 6 May 2005 edit undoBradBeattie (talk | contribs)6,888 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 18: Line 18:
If 0.999... is 1 then the whole basis of mathematics should be re-written. Mathematics is considered to be exact science. If 0.999... was EXACT 1 then it would not make ''any difference'' to say exempli gratia (for example) that domain is same than [0,1[ or 0.000...0001 is 0 which is the basis of differential calculus. One should not confuse the concept of irrationality with the concept rationality, or infinity with finity, or inexact with exact. If 0.999... is 1 then the whole basis of mathematics should be re-written. Mathematics is considered to be exact science. If 0.999... was EXACT 1 then it would not make ''any difference'' to say exempli gratia (for example) that domain is same than [0,1[ or 0.000...0001 is 0 which is the basis of differential calculus. One should not confuse the concept of irrationality with the concept rationality, or infinity with finity, or inexact with exact.


: Could you please prove your statement "If 0.999... was EXACT 1 then it would not make ''any difference'' to say exempli gratia (for example) that domain is same than ] 20:38, 6 May 2005 (UTC) : Could you please prove your statement? This page has a proof as to why 0.999~ = 1. Please provide your counter-proof. --] 20:38, 6 May 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:46, 6 May 2005

I created this page in response to two threads I saw and the confusion that arose. Figured it was something worth noting. --BradBeattie 18:58, 6 May 2005 (UTC)

I think you are right. I submitted it first for deletion because the title looked a bit misleading. This is not a series of nines, the series is if you wish of
9 10 n {\displaystyle {\frac {9}{10^{n}}}}

Cheers, Oleg Alexandrov 19:01, 6 May 2005 (UTC)

True, the title was a little slap-dash. Thanks for the improvement. --BradBeattie 19:03, 6 May 2005 (UTC)


"In mathematics, one could easily fall in the trap of thinking that while 0.999... is certainly close to 1, nevertheless the two are not equal. Here's a proof that they actually are."

0,999... is irrational and so is the article. Basis on "the proof" that 0.9999...=1 one could argue that irrational is rational which is simply jargon.


How about 999 1000 {\displaystyle {\frac {999\ldots }{1000\ldots }}} ? Might want to take a look at limits. --BradBeattie 20:16, 6 May 2005 (UTC)

If 0.999... is 1 then the whole basis of mathematics should be re-written. Mathematics is considered to be exact science. If 0.999... was EXACT 1 then it would not make any difference to say exempli gratia (for example) that domain is same than [0,1[ or 0.000...0001 is 0 which is the basis of differential calculus. One should not confuse the concept of irrationality with the concept rationality, or infinity with finity, or inexact with exact.

Could you please prove your statement? This page has a proof as to why 0.999~ = 1. Please provide your counter-proof. --BradBeattie 20:38, 6 May 2005 (UTC)