Misplaced Pages

:Requests for checkuser/Case/Digwuren: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser | Case Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:04, 26 May 2007 editPetri Krohn (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users37,092 edits created  Revision as of 19:45, 26 May 2007 edit undoDigwuren (talk | contribs)11,308 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 23: Line 23:


] and ] correspond to distinct Internet personalities. They however seem to be coordinating their edits off-line, and possibly editing from the same IP-address. If they are not sockpuppets, they are most likely ]. They only started editing after the ] controversy and seem to be single-purpouse accounts. Their intent seems to rewrite the ], deleting points-of-view that they consider "]" or otherwise symphathetic to ]. -- ] 17:04, 26 May 2007 (UTC) ] and ] correspond to distinct Internet personalities. They however seem to be coordinating their edits off-line, and possibly editing from the same IP-address. If they are not sockpuppets, they are most likely ]. They only started editing after the ] controversy and seem to be single-purpouse accounts. Their intent seems to rewrite the ], deleting points-of-view that they consider "]" or otherwise symphathetic to ]. -- ] 17:04, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

: I feel it necessary to point out that ] has been throwing out wild accusations at me for quite a while, starting from (and growing through ) through and finally, , not to mention "nice" edit summaries such as , , .

: The contention of "somehow related to the ]" is ridiculous. The University is the largest university in Estonia and a major provider of network services; of *course* most educated people, as well as a number of people caring of network connection, would be "somehow related" to it!

: In conclusion, what ] has done here is taking a number of people he doesn't like (and for bad reasons I will not enter here, using the last drops of what has remained of my belief into his ]), throwing wild generalisations at them in the hope that *something will stick*, and then applied for the checkuser procedure as a form of harassment. ] 19:45, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:45, 26 May 2007

Digwuren

Template:Checkuser requests to be listed

request links: mainedit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 17:04, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

All these users seem to be somehow related to the University of Tartu. They have co-operated in AfD discussions and revert wars. User:Digwuren has systematically reverted all my Estonia related edits for the past three weeks, often in only two minutes. He has received help in avoiding the 3RR from User:Alexia Death, User:3 Löwi and User:Klamber.

User:Digwuren and User:Alexia Death correspond to distinct Internet personalities. They however seem to be coordinating their edits off-line, and possibly editing from the same IP-address. If they are not sockpuppets, they are most likely meatpuppets. They only started editing after the Bronze Soldier of Tallinn controversy and seem to be single-purpouse accounts. Their intent seems to rewrite the History of Estonia, deleting points-of-view that they consider "Soviet occupation denialism" or otherwise symphathetic to Russians in Estonia. -- Petri Krohn 17:04, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

I feel it necessary to point out that Petri Krohn has been throwing out wild accusations at me for quite a while, starting from (and growing through ) through and finally, , not to mention "nice" edit summaries such as , , .
The contention of "somehow related to the University of Tartu" is ridiculous. The University is the largest university in Estonia and a major provider of network services; of *course* most educated people, as well as a number of people caring of network connection, would be "somehow related" to it!
In conclusion, what Petri Krohn has done here is taking a number of people he doesn't like (and for bad reasons I will not enter here, using the last drops of what has remained of my belief into his good faith), throwing wild generalisations at them in the hope that *something will stick*, and then applied for the checkuser procedure as a form of harassment. Digwuren 19:45, 26 May 2007 (UTC)