Misplaced Pages

Talk:Asperger syndrome: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:26, 18 December 2002 editMartinHarper (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers24,927 edits Both← Previous edit Revision as of 04:26, 13 March 2003 edit undoZoe (talk | contribs)35,376 edits What is acapedia.org?Next edit →
Line 4: Line 4:


: Both. Some people think that all or the vast majority of the DSM-IV is nonsense. A slightly larger number of people think that the specific entry for asperger's is nonsense. The former is arguably off-topic, though. -] : Both. Some people think that all or the vast majority of the DSM-IV is nonsense. A slightly larger number of people think that the specific entry for asperger's is nonsense. The former is arguably off-topic, though. -]

What is acapedia.org? Why, when I search for text from this page at Google, do I get a link to ], which directly connects me to this page? -- ]

:Besides that question, this article needs a lot of work -- too many long chunks of text. -- ]

Revision as of 04:26, 13 March 2003

I'm deleting a large chunk of text - however, since I wrote the text originally, no one should be concerned. :) I asked a friend knowelegeable about such matters to contribute some text, which I consider far superior to my initial entry and am thus putting in wholesale. -- April

Quick question about the following sentence from near the end of the article: The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual's diagnostic criteria have been roundly criticized for being far too vague and subjective. Is it the DSM's Asperger's diagnostic criteria that have been criticized, or *all* of the DSM's diagnostic criteria for all the disorders it tries to cover? I don't know, but I think the sentence or paragraph could be reworded a little to remove that confusion; as it is, I could read it either way. Wesley 17:07 Dec 18, 2002 (UTC)

Both. Some people think that all or the vast majority of the DSM-IV is nonsense. A slightly larger number of people think that the specific entry for asperger's is nonsense. The former is arguably off-topic, though. -Martin

What is acapedia.org? Why, when I search for text from this page at Google, do I get a link to acapedia.org/aca/Asperger's_Syndrome, which directly connects me to this page? -- Zoe

Besides that question, this article needs a lot of work -- too many long chunks of text. -- Zoe