Misplaced Pages

talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/Digwuren: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for checkuser | Case Browse history interactivelyContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:07, 26 May 2007 editGhirlandajo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers89,629 edits Created page with 'Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/DLX --~~~~'  Latest revision as of 23:54, 27 May 2007 edit undoPetri Krohn (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users37,089 edits moved commets from checkuser request 
Line 1: Line 1:
] --]<sup>]</sup> 21:07, 26 May 2007 (UTC) ] --]<sup>]</sup> 21:07, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

: I feel it necessary to point out that ] has been throwing out wild accusations at me for quite a while, starting from (and growing through ) through and finally, , not to mention "nice" edit summaries such as , , .

: The contention of "somehow related to the ]" is ridiculous. The University is the largest university in Estonia and a major provider of network services; of *course* most educated people, as well as a number of people caring of network connection, would be "somehow related" to it!

: In conclusion, what ] has done here is taking a number of people he doesn't like (and for bad reasons I will not enter here, using the last drops of what has remained of my belief into his ]), throwing wild generalisations at them in the hope that *something will stick*, and then applied for the checkuser procedure as a form of harassment. ] 19:45, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

: I find accusations of being someones meatpuppet offensive. I haven't been a registered user on wikipedia for long and became active mostly because of the recent controversies. Thus I am interested in articles that overlap ] and are concerning history and present of Estonia. We live in the same country so our views are likely to be similar. However I am very sure that our IP-s don't overlap. I post from two locations and both have pretty much static IP-s. --] 20:57, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
::I also find offensive the accusations of trying to somehow remove anything sympathetic to Russians in Estonia. I work with Russians living in Estonia daily and find most them to be nice people. Mind backing those claims up with some links?--] 21:17, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
::::TO Petri Krohn: “] ]”; <small>TO ] of Ghirlandaio: my thought would be lost in translation</small> ] 07:09, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
:::::'''Comment'''. As far as I know, all these users are separate persons - and I seriously doubt they are coordinating their edits off-line. There are two reasons for similarities in their edits - one is that all of them are from Estonia (and I think, also ethnic Estonians), second is Petri Krohn himself - slapping on various tags without any explanations on resp. talk pages, controversial unsourced edits, claiming that article in a peer-reviewed magazine () is "an extremely biased Estonian source" and treating any other (WP valid) published source in the same way if it doesn't fit his views. Repeated uncivil edit comments, inability to accept facts and creating controversial badly (if at all) cited articles (I am more then willing to give evidence for all of those claims, if that is asked). All users named by him have been forced to contradict him at some point, so it seems that he is trying to stop those users - after all, because he is always right, half a dozen users who do not agree with him must be sockpuppets and meatpuppets. ] 09:55, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:54, 27 May 2007

Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/DLX --Ghirla 21:07, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

I feel it necessary to point out that Petri Krohn has been throwing out wild accusations at me for quite a while, starting from (and growing through ) through and finally, , not to mention "nice" edit summaries such as , , .
The contention of "somehow related to the University of Tartu" is ridiculous. The University is the largest university in Estonia and a major provider of network services; of *course* most educated people, as well as a number of people caring of network connection, would be "somehow related" to it!
In conclusion, what Petri Krohn has done here is taking a number of people he doesn't like (and for bad reasons I will not enter here, using the last drops of what has remained of my belief into his good faith), throwing wild generalisations at them in the hope that *something will stick*, and then applied for the checkuser procedure as a form of harassment. Digwuren 19:45, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
I find accusations of being someones meatpuppet offensive. I haven't been a registered user on wikipedia for long and became active mostly because of the recent controversies. Thus I am interested in articles that overlap Digwurens and are concerning history and present of Estonia. We live in the same country so our views are likely to be similar. However I am very sure that our IP-s don't overlap. I post from two locations and both have pretty much static IP-s. --Alexia Death 20:57, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
I also find offensive the accusations of trying to somehow remove anything sympathetic to Russians in Estonia. I work with Russians living in Estonia daily and find most them to be nice people. Mind backing those claims up with some links?--Alexia Death 21:17, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
TO Petri Krohn: “Uinuv mõistus sünnitab koletisi”; TO the watchful eye of Ghirlandaio: my thought would be lost in translation E.J. 07:09, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Comment. As far as I know, all these users are separate persons - and I seriously doubt they are coordinating their edits off-line. There are two reasons for similarities in their edits - one is that all of them are from Estonia (and I think, also ethnic Estonians), second is Petri Krohn himself - slapping on various tags without any explanations on resp. talk pages, controversial unsourced edits, claiming that article in a peer-reviewed magazine (Nordic Journal of International Law) is "an extremely biased Estonian source" and treating any other (WP valid) published source in the same way if it doesn't fit his views. Repeated uncivil edit comments, inability to accept facts and creating controversial badly (if at all) cited articles (I am more then willing to give evidence for all of those claims, if that is asked). All users named by him have been forced to contradict him at some point, so it seems that he is trying to stop those users - after all, because he is always right, half a dozen users who do not agree with him must be sockpuppets and meatpuppets. DLX 09:55, 27 May 2007 (UTC)