| Revision as of 18:16, 26 May 2007 editMakerowner (talk | contribs)332 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:10, 28 May 2007 edit undoCatneven (talk | contribs)590 edits dispute on mysteryNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| <!--<nowiki>Add new items HERE. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> | <!--<nowiki>Add new items HERE. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> | ||
| *]; dispute on disambiguation ( I do not know where to put this request elsewhere)16:10, 28 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *]; ] No disputes here; I just want to see if there's anything worth saving here before I put these articles up for deletion. 18:16, 26 May 2007 (UTC) | *]; ] No disputes here; I just want to see if there's anything worth saving here before I put these articles up for deletion. 18:16, 26 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *]. Dispute regarding the antiquity of Tamil & Tamil's influence on Sanskrit. 17:32, 17 May 2007 (UTC) | *]. Dispute regarding the antiquity of Tamil & Tamil's influence on Sanskrit. 17:32, 17 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:10, 28 May 2007
Shortcut- ]
Template:RFCheader Please note that this page is reserved for disputes in articles about language or linguistics, not policy disputes or language usage in unrelated articles.
- Talk:mystery; dispute on disambiguation ( I do not know where to put this request elsewhere)16:10, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Hard and soft g; Hard and soft c No disputes here; I just want to see if there's anything worth saving here before I put these articles up for deletion. 18:16, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- Antiquity of Tamil & Tamil's influence. Dispute regarding the antiquity of Tamil & Tamil's influence on Sanskrit. 17:32, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Babylon (program), I have been trying to revise page of Babylon Translator to include criticisms. One user rejects all changes. Can one criticize a translation program? What counts as source material for criticisms?Teguiste 14:51, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
- Leet; Talk:Leet – Is Leet to be considered a writing system? There is also a discussion on whether the article is neutral in its depiction of Leet. 04:43, 28 April 2007 (UTC)