| Revision as of 21:08, 28 May 2007 edit71.112.115.55 (talk) removed harrassment← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:46, 29 May 2007 edit undoPetri Krohn (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users37,089 edits {{SharedIP|Verizon Communications, USA|host=pool-71-112-115-55.sttlwa.dsl-w.verizon.net}}Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{SharedIP|], ]|host=pool-71-112-115-55.sttlwa.dsl-w.verizon.net}} | |||
| ==re:block== | ==re:block== | ||
| My block of that IP was totally justified in that it matched a pattern of harassment directed towards an editor. In particular it sought to replace properly attributed photographs with cropped versions that do not contain proper attribution (in breach of the license under which they were first uploaded). The person who crops them asserts that they are the author, rather than correctly crediting the photo taker. As to whether a cropped version is better, that is a matter of editorial discretion to be discussed. But blanket replacement on an editors photos looks like harassment to me and will not be tolerated. <span style="font-family: Verdana">]]</span> 02:27, 28 May 2007 (UTC) | My block of that IP was totally justified in that it matched a pattern of harassment directed towards an editor. In particular it sought to replace properly attributed photographs with cropped versions that do not contain proper attribution (in breach of the license under which they were first uploaded). The person who crops them asserts that they are the author, rather than correctly crediting the photo taker. As to whether a cropped version is better, that is a matter of editorial discretion to be discussed. But blanket replacement on an editors photos looks like harassment to me and will not be tolerated. <span style="font-family: Verdana">]]</span> 02:27, 28 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:46, 29 May 2007
 Welcome!Last edited:Last edited by:00:46, 29 May 2007 (UTC) Petri Krohn (talk · contribs) Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Misplaced Pages? Create an account! Your host, To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.  Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. |
re:block
My block of that IP was totally justified in that it matched a pattern of harassment directed towards an editor. In particular it sought to replace properly attributed photographs with cropped versions that do not contain proper attribution (in breach of the license under which they were first uploaded). The person who crops them asserts that they are the author, rather than correctly crediting the photo taker. As to whether a cropped version is better, that is a matter of editorial discretion to be discussed. But blanket replacement on an editors photos looks like harassment to me and will not be tolerated. WjBscribe 02:27, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- This is not an edit war. Your harassment of David will cease or you will be blocked. I also will not permit photos without correct attribution to be added to any article on Misplaced Pages, as doing so would contravene GFDL. WjBscribe 02:45, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
I came here to make the same point; more than one admin is now keeping an eye on this matter, and it would be wise to stop the harassment. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 12:49, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- What exactly is your relationship to 84.178.254.52? --Mel Etitis (Talk) 16:16, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- a common interest in improving wikipedia, i suppose 71.112.115.55 17:03, 28 May 2007 (UTC)