User talk:84.178.254.52: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 17:49, 28 May 2007 editDavid Shankbone (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,979 edits {{sockpuppet}}← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:51, 29 May 2007 edit undoPetri Krohn (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users37,089 edits {{SharedIP\|T-Online, Germany\|p54B2FE34.dip.t-dialin.net}}Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{SharedIP\|], ]\|p54B2FE34.dip.t-dialin.net}}

	{{sockpuppet\|84.178.245.100}}		{{sockpuppet\|84.178.245.100}}
	Editing articles and replacing pictures with cropped versions without AmEx advertisements is not trolling or vandalism. Unfortunately, ] feels very possessive about "his" material and tries to stop everyone from editing his contributions. He either starts edit wars or asks for page protection every time one of "his" pictures is replaced by another, even if the new picture is of better quality. See his edit history and, for instance, the edit history and talk page of ]. Furthermore, no editor "owns" any part of the material published on Wiki and no individual member of the Wiki community controls any specific material published on Wiki, therefore, to edit images contributed by ] is not against Wiki rules. Last but not least, according to ], signing the images with directly visible personal tags are strongly discouraged, that's what the image description pages and the "History" pages are for. The bottom line is, not me but ] violated several Wiki guidelines, such as ], ], ], ], ], ] and ] , just to name a few.		Editing articles and replacing pictures with cropped versions without AmEx advertisements is not trolling or vandalism. Unfortunately, ] feels very possessive about "his" material and tries to stop everyone from editing his contributions. He either starts edit wars or asks for page protection every time one of "his" pictures is replaced by another, even if the new picture is of better quality. See his edit history and, for instance, the edit history and talk page of ]. Furthermore, no editor "owns" any part of the material published on Wiki and no individual member of the Wiki community controls any specific material published on Wiki, therefore, to edit images contributed by ] is not against Wiki rules. Last but not least, according to ], signing the images with directly visible personal tags are strongly discouraged, that's what the image description pages and the "History" pages are for. The bottom line is, not me but ] violated several Wiki guidelines, such as ], ], ], ], ], ] and ] , just to name a few.

Revision as of 00:51, 29 May 2007

Welcome!Last edited:
Last edited by:00:51, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Petri Krohn (talk · contribs)

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Misplaced Pages? Create an account!

Your IP address, 84.178.254.52, is registered to T-Online, Germany and may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of 84.178.245.100 (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

"Category:Suspected Misplaced Pages sockpuppets of 84.178.245.100" does not exist.
Please use this link to create the category page
(The page will be pre-loaded. All you need to do is save it)

Editing articles and replacing pictures with cropped versions without AmEx advertisements is not trolling or vandalism. Unfortunately, David Shankbone feels very possessive about "his" material and tries to stop everyone from editing his contributions. He either starts edit wars or asks for page protection every time one of "his" pictures is replaced by another, even if the new picture is of better quality. See his edit history and, for instance, the edit history and talk page of Afro. Furthermore, no editor "owns" any part of the material published on Wiki and no individual member of the Wiki community controls any specific material published on Wiki, therefore, to edit images contributed by David Shankbone is not against Wiki rules. Last but not least, according to Commons:Ownership of pages and files, signing the images with directly visible personal tags are strongly discouraged, that's what the image description pages and the "History" pages are for. The bottom line is, not me but David Shankbone violated several Wiki guidelines, such as Commons:Ownership of pages and files, Misplaced Pages:Assume good faith, Misplaced Pages:Please do not bite the newcomers, Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions, Misplaced Pages:Edit war, Misplaced Pages:Wiki spirit and Misplaced Pages:Canvassing , just to name a few.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

84.178.254.52 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here

Decline reason:

If you feel your versions of the images (which lack the required attributions) are better, you should have discussed it with David, not edit-warred about it. — Sandstein 22:20, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I didn't violate 3rr, so a block for "edit warring" is unwarranted. Furthermore, David Shankbone's reverts exceed mine and he requested my block right away, without any discussion and without any dispute resolution process.

Comment

The block is justified because you reverted DavidShankBone edits 4 times on three articles. You did not break 3RR but you did edit war.--James, La gloria è a dio 22:34, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Editing and reverting are two different things. I have done several edits, but I only reverted 2 articles 2 times, hardly something you can call an edit war. If I edit warred, then so did David Shankbone, his reverts exceed mine. I assume that he is blocked as well for edit warring and for Misplaced Pages:No personal attacks ("troll")?

It's interesting that this IP feels they know me so well, when I have had limited interaction with you. We have never actively engaged each other on talk pages. It's amazing you somehow have been able to edit every page I edit; every photograph you crop is mine. Have you wondered where this ire against me and my work has come from? You continually put a photo of a man in a wig (a photoshopped wig, at that) on the Afro page, and four different editors have removed it, five if you include me. This is what you consider ownership and edit warring? Then you have taken my photographs and decided to rename them simply to remove David Shankbone out of the file name. Your intentions are no pure. You are gaming the policies and guidelines to Wikistalk me. You say not to bite the newcomers, but I haven't actively engaged you. If you are a newcomer, how come you have such a handy knowledge of Wiki policies and guidelines? Why is every page in your history one I have contributed to? What is your issue with me, in particular? You have also done all of this under another IP, User:84.178.245.100. Why is this a productive use of your time? It's bizarre. Is it solely coincidence that my usual troll, User:71.112.115.55 AKA User:71.112.142.5 AKA User:71.112.7.212 AKA User: 71.112.6.35, have the EXACT same problems and behavior, on the same pages? It's a stunning coincidence; surely you two can't be friends. --David Shankbone 00:21, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Why is this user blocked?

Looks like all he did was improve a few pictures that were oversized and included advertisements for American Express. Is that a blockable behavior? Why isn't David blocked? 71.112.115.55 02:14, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Warning

Just a warning: there are now at least two admins watching your behaviour (and 71.112.115.55) — I strongly suggest that you stop this apparent vendetta. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 16:15, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Category:

Suspected Misplaced Pages sockpuppets of 84.178.245.100

Revision as of 17:49, 28 May 2007 editDavid Shankbone (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,979 edits {{sockpuppet}}← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:51, 29 May 2007 edit undoPetri Krohn (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users37,089 edits {{SharedIP\|T-Online, Germany\|p54B2FE34.dip.t-dialin.net}}Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{SharedIP\|], ]\|p54B2FE34.dip.t-dialin.net}}

	{{sockpuppet\|84.178.245.100}}		{{sockpuppet\|84.178.245.100}}
	Editing articles and replacing pictures with cropped versions without AmEx advertisements is not trolling or vandalism. Unfortunately, ] feels very possessive about "his" material and tries to stop everyone from editing his contributions. He either starts edit wars or asks for page protection every time one of "his" pictures is replaced by another, even if the new picture is of better quality. See his edit history and, for instance, the edit history and talk page of ]. Furthermore, no editor "owns" any part of the material published on Wiki and no individual member of the Wiki community controls any specific material published on Wiki, therefore, to edit images contributed by ] is not against Wiki rules. Last but not least, according to ], signing the images with directly visible personal tags are strongly discouraged, that's what the image description pages and the "History" pages are for. The bottom line is, not me but ] violated several Wiki guidelines, such as ], ], ], ], ], ] and ] , just to name a few.		Editing articles and replacing pictures with cropped versions without AmEx advertisements is not trolling or vandalism. Unfortunately, ] feels very possessive about "his" material and tries to stop everyone from editing his contributions. He either starts edit wars or asks for page protection every time one of "his" pictures is replaced by another, even if the new picture is of better quality. See his edit history and, for instance, the edit history and talk page of ]. Furthermore, no editor "owns" any part of the material published on Wiki and no individual member of the Wiki community controls any specific material published on Wiki, therefore, to edit images contributed by ] is not against Wiki rules. Last but not least, according to ], signing the images with directly visible personal tags are strongly discouraged, that's what the image description pages and the "History" pages are for. The bottom line is, not me but ] violated several Wiki guidelines, such as ], ], ], ], ], ] and ] , just to name a few.