| Revision as of 23:30, 30 November 2004 editMydogategodshat (talk | contribs)7,163 edits →See Also← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:08, 2 March 2005 edit undoMaurreen (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,724 edits del biz catNext edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| ]] | ] | ||
Revision as of 07:08, 2 March 2005
Trade sanctions are trade penalties imposed by one or more countries on one or more other countries. Typically the sanctions take the form of import tariffs (duties), licensing schemes or other administrative hurdles. They tend to arise in the context of an unresolved trade or policy dispute, such as a disagreement about the fairness of some policy affecting international trade (imports or exports).
For example, one country may conclude that another is unfairly subsidising exports of one or more products, or unfairly protecting some sector from competition (from imported goods or services). The first country may retaliate by imposing import duties, or some other sanction, on goods or services from the second.
Politics of trade sanctions
- Trade Sanctions can be used as a punitive measure in international relations (examples being recent US or multilateral sanctions against Cuba, Iraq, or North Korea).
- Sanctions can be a coercive measure for achiveing particular policy goals (such as United States sanctions against Brazil over patent law in the late 1980s).
Recent Historical Examples of Trade Sanctions
Worldwide there have been many examples of such disputes and associated sanctions. For example, American US steel companies requested, and were at times granted, protection from steel imports that they claimed enjoyed an unfair advantage due to the economic policy of the steel exporting country. At times it was asserted that the exporting company was dumping steel overseas (in the USA) at below cost. See United States steel tariff 2002
Again, as the Asian economies became more and more effective competitors on the international stage, achieved largely via export-led growth, many countries imposed import tariffs and other measures aimed at protecting domestic industries. The intention was not always permanent protection (of the threatened industry) but sometimes an attempt to give the domestic firms time to adjust to a changed competitive context.
The disagreements that occur are not only bi-lateral and can be fundamental to the working of the global economy and e.g. to the alleviation of global poverty. At the moment (September 2003) World Trade Organisation talks in Cancun have just broken down between the advanced nations and the developing world. Unresolved issues include that of whether the advanced nations are unfairly subsidising their agricultural sectors to the detriment of the developing world (that might otherwise sell more agricultural produce into e.g. the USA and Europe).