| Revision as of 02:43, 14 June 2007 editKnuckle50 (talk | contribs)50 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:53, 14 June 2007 edit undoNufy8 (talk | contribs)12,541 editsm Reverted edits by Knuckle50 (talk) to last version by Leon SwordNext edit → | ||
| Line 112: | Line 112: | ||
| If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on <span class="plainlinks"></span>. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Replaceable --> --] 23:26, 13 June 2007 (UTC) | If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on <span class="plainlinks"></span>. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Replaceable --> --] 23:26, 13 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| Librarians have something to hide. 8================> | |||
Revision as of 02:53, 14 June 2007
edit count | edit summary usage Archives | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Your input is requested
Your input would be appreciated at this Request for Comments. Kelly Martin (talk) 16:23, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not as personally involved as some of the others to comment, and it looks like they've done an adequate job summing things up. Nufy8 17:28, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
wot hpnd to maru?
hey nufy y did maru leave wikipedia? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mil Falcon (talk • contribs) 19:53, 14 December 2006 (UTC).
- He was in hot water over some of his actions, and a request for arbitration was filed against him. He lost his administrative powers as a result of the ruling. Nufy8 20:50, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Why has Maru left Misplaced Pages? 193.154.194.38 08:41, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- See my comment right above yours. Nufy8 18:41, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Why has Maru left Misplaced Pages? 193.154.194.38 08:41, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:LoGSacrament.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:LoGSacrament.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:36, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
.. ..-. / -.-- --- ..- / -.-. .- -. / .-. . .- -.. / - .... .. ... / --. --- / - --- / -- .. .-.. / ..-. .- .-.. -.-. --- -. .----. ... / ..- ... . .-. / .--. .- --. . / .- -. -.. / ..-. --- .-.. .-..
.. ..-. / -.-- --- ..- / -.-. .- -. / .-. . .- -.. / - .... .. ... / --. --- / - --- / -- .. .-.. / ..-. .- .-.. -.-. --- -. .----. ... / ..- ... . .-. / .--. .- --. . / .- -. -.. / ..-. --- .-.. .-.. --- .-- / - .... . / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mil Falcon (talk • contribs) 21:47, 29 January 2007 (UTC).
COMPLETE!
With the addition of a castlist and the proud editors/conversionsists, I do think that the Wiki Wars page is complete!
...So now what precisely should we do to let off excess nerdery? --AK-17 16:49, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for compiling the cast/editors. As for what to do next, we need to get it out to a wider audience. Gwern suggested BJAODN as a start. Nufy8 17:49, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Also, we should probably look it over for errors. Nufy8 17:50, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Worked on getting the script to be more wikiterms than otherwise and fixed a few spelling errors. Also, you've got a last name now. ;) --AK-17 14:28, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Vandalwhacker... nice. Nufy8 16:50, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Worked on getting the script to be more wikiterms than otherwise and fixed a few spelling errors. Also, you've got a last name now. ;) --AK-17 14:28, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
POV... or escriptions?
Just like to know why you think that adding more descriptions of Pantera's albums is POV. Examples: why'd you delete info about Dimebag's guitar sound, why'd you delete how the albums compare, why'd you delete info about the songs...?
- A statement like this and this claiming that an album is the band's "harshest" or most "brutal" is a subjective statement of opinion; if there are reputable sources that agree with this statement, then it's possible to incorporate it into the article in a more appropriate manner. Nufy8 01:50, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
pulp fiction // dumb and dumber
This is a serious topic. Dont delete unless you know. Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 172.166.41.89 (talk) 00:37, 16 April 2007 (UTC).
- Asserting that Dumb and Dumber is similar to Pulp Fiction is a rather farfetched claim. Such claims are subject to removal unless a reliable source is provided to back it up. This is why I reverted your edits, and will do so again until this information can be verified by a reliable source. Nufy8 00:46, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
(Personal attack removed) – Riana 04:29, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Vandal reversions
Thanks for reverting the anonymous vandalism on my talk page. It's futile in this case, however. This is a serial vandal on AOL, who vandalizes userpages and user talk pages of anyone who warns him. It turns out that AOL is a perfect ISP from which to vandalize anonymously. Every time an AOL user accesses Misplaced Pages, AOL assigns a different IP address! So an AOL user can make 20 vandal edits from a dozen different IP addresses. Very frustrating. My userpage is now semi-protected, but it looks like the talk page will have to be also. -Amatulic 16:52, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I've had similar experiences. Best to just wait it out until they get bored. Nufy8 18:28, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Unspecified source for Image:Panterapromo.jpg
The source of image is still needed. Alex Spade 10:19, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Supershadowmainpage.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Supershadowmainpage.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Coredesat 06:37, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Thanks From the undertow
Hello. I appreciate the effort that you have put forth in fighting vandalism, especially reverting particular edits to my userpage. I am appalled that a vandal would imply that I take part in such a nefarious activity. It has never even crossed my mind. the_undertow 21:53, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- No problem. Nufy8 22:25, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
My UC Irvine Edit
Hey Nufy8, keep up the good work in making sure that Wiki articles are accurate. However, I do have a complaint, if my paragraph wasn't neutral, the paragraph before mine is not neutral as well. That paragraph gives arguments for not having a football team. I checked the cite for the paragraph before mine and it does not seem to back up his assertions. what if I begin my paragraph with "Critics contend that"? Why allow a paragraph in support of not having a football team and not allow one that is in support of having a football team. By censoring my paragraphs and not the paragraph before, I believe that Misplaced Pages is engaging in viewpoint discrimination. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.91.228.17 (talk) 02:20, 14 May 2007 (UTC).
- If you can supply references that support the claim that critics contend UCI's lack of a football program is diminishing it in some way, then go ahead. Note that the current paragraph about a football program does not advocate a position, but merely explains why UCI does not wish to create a football program. Also, this is referenced; it might be more accurate to link to the PDFs that discuss it, however. Nufy8 03:04, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Note: the current paragraph about the football program does advocate a position. But your the mediator not me. It gives the viewpoint of the university. Since it gives the viewpoint of the university, which is not neutral (by the way), it is unfair to censor the opposing viewpoint. viewpoint neutrality is in your guidelines. If you remove my edit, I say you should remove the paragraph from before. You never said earlier that my article was removed for the lack of cites, you removed my article for neutrality purposes. If this is the case, you did not maintain neutrality —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.91.228.17 (talk) 04:50, 14 May 2007 (UTC).
- The opposing viewpoint is not being censored; as I previously stated, editors are encouraged to mention opposition provided they can back it up with credible sources. There's also an important distinction to be made that I think you're missing. Having the article state "The lack of a football program is a bad thing" is POV, no matter how supported it is by sources, because it makes the article itself conform to a certain point of view; this is why I identified your edits as POV in my edit summary. Having the article state "Critics contend that the lack of a football program is a bad thing," as you had suggested, is not as blatantly POV because it introduces attribution, and therefore does not make the article conform to the viewpoint being expressed. The problem is that this attribution is not referenced, and as such, cannot be accepted. Verifiability is absolutely essential in introducing any viewpoint. Nufy8 05:12, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- OK, thanks, Ill do some research.....FYI I am a UCI Alum, and am pretty bitter about no football team, as you can probably tell. I wen to grad school and watched a lot of games with USC, UCLA, CAL, Maryland, Ohio St. people and basically felt left out. hahaha. But i will get on some cites. Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.91.228.17 (talk) 07:04, 14 May 2007 (UTC).
- Looks a lot better now. Thanks. Nufy8 14:11, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- OK, thanks, Ill do some research.....FYI I am a UCI Alum, and am pretty bitter about no football team, as you can probably tell. I wen to grad school and watched a lot of games with USC, UCLA, CAL, Maryland, Ohio St. people and basically felt left out. hahaha. But i will get on some cites. Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.91.228.17 (talk) 07:04, 14 May 2007 (UTC).
- The opposing viewpoint is not being censored; as I previously stated, editors are encouraged to mention opposition provided they can back it up with credible sources. There's also an important distinction to be made that I think you're missing. Having the article state "The lack of a football program is a bad thing" is POV, no matter how supported it is by sources, because it makes the article itself conform to a certain point of view; this is why I identified your edits as POV in my edit summary. Having the article state "Critics contend that the lack of a football program is a bad thing," as you had suggested, is not as blatantly POV because it introduces attribution, and therefore does not make the article conform to the viewpoint being expressed. The problem is that this attribution is not referenced, and as such, cannot be accepted. Verifiability is absolutely essential in introducing any viewpoint. Nufy8 05:12, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Note: the current paragraph about the football program does advocate a position. But your the mediator not me. It gives the viewpoint of the university. Since it gives the viewpoint of the university, which is not neutral (by the way), it is unfair to censor the opposing viewpoint. viewpoint neutrality is in your guidelines. If you remove my edit, I say you should remove the paragraph from before. You never said earlier that my article was removed for the lack of cites, you removed my article for neutrality purposes. If this is the case, you did not maintain neutrality —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.91.228.17 (talk) 04:50, 14 May 2007 (UTC).
Non-free use disputed for Image:Dystopia2.jpg
|
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Dystopia2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:15, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Image:Drykilllogicband.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Drykilllogicband.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add
{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Leon Sword 23:26, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
