Misplaced Pages

Improvised explosive device: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:26, 19 June 2007 editSeiteNichtGefunden (talk | contribs)124 edits revert vandalism← Previous edit Revision as of 12:17, 19 June 2007 edit undoParsecboy (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators183,965 edits Undid revision 139146352 by SeiteNichtGefunden (talk)Next edit →
Line 2: Line 2:
] ]


An '''improvised explosive device''' ('''IED''') is the common name for ] devices, often used in ] or asymmetrical warfare by ], ]s or ] forces in a ]. In the 2003–present ], fighters have made the IED one of their main weapons against coalition forces. '''IED'''s are sometimes referred to by the press as '''roadside bombs'''. An '''improvised explosive device''' ('''IED''') is the common name for ] devices, often used in ], ] or asymmetrical warfare by ], ]s or ] forces in a ]. In the 2003–present ], insurgents have made the IED one of their main weapons against coalition forces. '''IED'''s are sometimes referred to by the press as '''roadside bombs'''.


==Background== ==Background==
Line 23: Line 23:
Military forces and law enforcement personnel from around the world have developed a number of ] (RSP) to deal with IEDs. RSPs may be developed as a result of direct experience with devices or by applied research designed to counter the threat. Recently, has begun shipping portable IED jamming devices. These devices enable the user to temporarily disable all cell activated IEDs in the area. It works much the same as the Military's but is much cheaper, portable, and available to the common soldier. The portability is especially useful for scouting missions or anytime the soldier is without a vehicle already equipped with the Warlock System. Military forces and law enforcement personnel from around the world have developed a number of ] (RSP) to deal with IEDs. RSPs may be developed as a result of direct experience with devices or by applied research designed to counter the threat. Recently, has begun shipping portable IED jamming devices. These devices enable the user to temporarily disable all cell activated IEDs in the area. It works much the same as the Military's but is much cheaper, portable, and available to the common soldier. The portability is especially useful for scouting missions or anytime the soldier is without a vehicle already equipped with the Warlock System.


Military forces from ], ], ], ] and the ] are at the forefront of counter-IED efforts, as all have direct experience in dealing with IEDs used against them in conflict. Military forces from ], ], ], ] and the ] are at the forefront of counter-IED efforts, as all have direct experience in dealing with IEDs used against them in conflict or terrorist attacks.


Technological countermeasures are only part of the solution in the effort to defeat IEDs; experience, training and awareness remain key factors in combating them. For example, there are visual signs that may suggest the presence of an IED, such as recently turned-over soil or sand by a road, or an abandoned vehicle beside a road. Recognizing these telltale signs may be as valuable as having sophisticated detection equipment. Technological countermeasures are only part of the solution in the effort to defeat IEDs; experience, training and awareness remain key factors in combating them. For example, there are visual signs that may suggest the presence of an IED, such as recently turned-over soil or sand by a road, or an abandoned vehicle beside a road. Recognizing these telltale signs may be as valuable as having sophisticated detection equipment.

Revision as of 12:17, 19 June 2007

This article is about the explosive device. For other uses, see IED.
Munitions rigged for an IED discovered by Iraqi police in Baghdad, November 2005.

An improvised explosive device (IED) is the common name for explosive devices, often used in terrorism, unconventional warfare or asymmetrical warfare by terrorists, guerrillas or commando forces in a theater of operations. In the 2003–present Iraq War, insurgents have made the IED one of their main weapons against coalition forces. IEDs are sometimes referred to by the press as roadside bombs.

Background

Improvised explosive devices found in a house under construction in Iraq, utilising video cassette recorders as timers.

An IED is a bomb fabricated in an improvised manner incorporating destructive, lethal, noxious, pyrotechnic, or incendiary chemicals and designed to destroy or incapacitate personnel or vehicles. In some cases, IEDs are used to distract, disrupt, or delay an opposing force, facilitating another type of attack. IEDs may incorporate military or commercially-sourced explosives, and often combine both types, or they may otherwise be made with home made explosives (HME).

An IED typically consists of an explosive charge (potentially assisted by a booster charge), a detonator, and an initiation system, which is a mechanism that initiates the electrical charge that sets off the device. IEDs are extremely diverse in design, and may contain many types of initiators, detonators, and explosive loads. In some cases, IEDs also contain metal objects such as nails or ball bearings (known as shipyard confetti after the metal waste found in the shipyards of Belfast). IEDs are triggered by various methods, including remote control, infra-red or magnetic triggers, pressure-sensitive bars or trip wires. In some cases, multiple IEDs are wired together in a daisy-chain, to attack a convoy of vehicles spread out along a roadway.

IEDs made by inexperienced designers or with substandard materials may fail to detonate, and in some cases actually detonate on either the maker or the emplacer of the device (these unintended early detonations are known as pre-detonations or "own goals" if the placer is killed in the detonation). However, some groups have been known to produce sophisticated devices that are constructed with components scavenged from conventional munitions and standard consumer electronics components, such as mobile phones, washing machine timers, pagers, or garage door openers. The sophistication of an IED depends on the training of the designer and the tools and materials available.

The majority of IEDs use conventional high-explosive charges as their explosive load. However, the threat exists that toxic chemical, biological, or radioactive (dirty bomb) material may be added to a device, thereby creating a host of other life-threatening effects beyond shrapnel, concussive blasts and fire normally associated with bombs.

A vehicle borne IED, or VBIED, is a military term for a car bomb or truck bomb. These are typically employed by suicide bombers, and can carry a relatively large payload. They can also be detonated from a remote location. VBIEDs can create additional shrapnel through the destruction of the vehicle itself, as well as using vehicle fuel as an incendiary weapon.

Detecting and disarming an IED

A U.S. Marine in Iraq shown with a robot used for disposal of buried devices

Since these devices are improvised, there are no specific guidelines for Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) personnel to use to positively identify or categorize them. EOD personnel are trained in the rendering safe and disposal of IEDs. The presence of chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear (CBRN) material in an IED requires additional precautions. As with other missions, the EOD operator provides the area commander with an assessment of the situation and of support needed to complete the mission.

Countermeasures

Military forces and law enforcement personnel from around the world have developed a number of Render Safe Procedures (RSP) to deal with IEDs. RSPs may be developed as a result of direct experience with devices or by applied research designed to counter the threat. Recently, Comp Nine has begun shipping portable IED jamming devices. These devices enable the user to temporarily disable all cell activated IEDs in the area. It works much the same as the Military's Warlock System but is much cheaper, portable, and available to the common soldier. The portability is especially useful for scouting missions or anytime the soldier is without a vehicle already equipped with the Warlock System.

Military forces from Canada, United Kingdom, Israel, Spain and the United States are at the forefront of counter-IED efforts, as all have direct experience in dealing with IEDs used against them in conflict or terrorist attacks.

Technological countermeasures are only part of the solution in the effort to defeat IEDs; experience, training and awareness remain key factors in combating them. For example, there are visual signs that may suggest the presence of an IED, such as recently turned-over soil or sand by a road, or an abandoned vehicle beside a road. Recognizing these telltale signs may be as valuable as having sophisticated detection equipment.

History

World War II

One of the first examples of coordinated large-scale use of IEDs was the Belarusian Rail War launched by Belarusian guerillas against the Nazis during World War II. Both command-detonated and delayed-fuse IEDs were used to derail thousands of German trains during 1943–1944.

Northern Ireland

Throughout The Troubles, the Provisional IRA made extensive use of IEDs in their campaign against the British army. From simple petrol bombs (Molotov Cocktail) to sophisticated remote controlled IEDs (RCIEDs), the members of the PIRA developed and counter-developed devices and tactics.

Roadside bombs were extensively used by the Provisional IRA. Typically, a roadside bomb was placed in a drain or culvert along a rural road and exploded by remote control when British Army or other security forces vehicles were passing. The most lethal example of these attacks came in 1979, when 18 British soldiers were killed by two culvert bombs at Warrenpoint. As a result of the use of these bombs, the British military had to stop transport by road in areas such as South Armagh, and use helicopter transport instead. In the 1980s and 1990s, all culverts were welded and concreted shut, so that explosives could not be placed in them.

Most IEDs used commercial or homemade explosives, although the use of Semtex H smuggled in from Libya in the 1980s was also common from the mid 1980s onwards. Bomb Disposal teams from 321 EOD manned by Ammunition Technicians were deployed in those areas to deal with the IED threat.

In the early 1970s, at the height of the PIRA campaign, the British Army unit tasked with rendering safe IEDs, 321 EOD, sustained significant casualties while engaged in bomb disposal operations. This mortality rate was far higher than other high risk occupations such as deep sea diving, and a careful review was made of how men were selected for EOD operations. The review recommended bringing in psychometric testing of soldiers to ensure those chosen had the correct mental preparation for high risk bomb disposal duties.

The IRA came up with ever more sophisticated designs and deployments of IEDs. Booby Trap or Victim Operated IEDs (VOIEDs), were commonplace. The IRA engaged in an ongoing battle to gain the upper hand in electronic warfare with remote controlled devices. The rapid changes in development led 321 EOD to employ specialists from DERA, the Royal Signals, and Military Intelligence. This multi-unit approach led to the development and use of most of the modern weapons, equipment and techniques now used by EOD Operators throughout the rest of the world.

The bomb disposal operations were led by Ammunition Technicians and Ammunition Technical Officer from 321 EOD, and were trained at the Felix Centre at the Army School of Ammunition. To this day the Felix Centre is the foremost authority on IEDD in the world.

Vietnam

IEDs were used during the Vietnam War by the Viet Cong against land- and river-borne vehicles as well as personnel. They were commonly constructed using materials from unexploded American ordnance. 33 percent of U.S. casualties in Vietnam and 28 percent of deaths were officially attributed to mines; these figures include losses caused by both IEDs and commercially manufactured mines.

The Grenade in a Can was a simple and effective booby trap. A hand grenade with the safety pin removed and safety lever compressed was placed into a container such as a tin can, with a length of string or tripwire attached to the grenade. The can was fixed in place and the other end of the string stretched across a path or doorway opening and firmly tied down. Alternatively, the end of the string could be attached to the moving portion of a door or gate. When the grenade was pulled out of the can by a person or vehicle placing tension on the string, the spring-loaded safety lever would release and the grenade would explode. American forces would place grenades, with the pin pulled, in empty food cans that appeared to have been discarded as a booby trap for the resourceful and frugal Viet Cong.

The rubber band grenade was another booby trap. To make this device, a Viet Cong guerilla would wrap a strong rubber band around the spring-loaded safety lever of a hand grenade and remove the pin. The grenade was then hidden in a hut. American and South Vietnamese soldiers would burn huts regularly to prevent them from being inhabited again, or to expose foxholes and tunnel entrances, which were frequently concealed within these structures. When a hut with the booby trap was torched, the rubber band on the grenade would melt, releasing the safety lever and blowing up the hut. This would often wound the soldiers with burning bamboo and metal fragments. This booby trap was also used to destroy vehicles when the modified grenade was placed in the fuel tank. The device would be triggered when the rubber band would be eaten away by the chemical action of the fuel, releasing the safety lever and detonating the grenade.

Afghanistan

Following the invasion of Afghanistan by the USSR on 27 December 1979, the Afghan Mujahideen were supplied with large quantities of military supplies from many Muslim states and from the United States. Among those supplies were many types of anti-tank mines. The Afghan Mujahideen often removed the explosives from several foreign anti-tank mines, and combine the explosives in tin cooking-oil cans for a more powerful blast. Often the foreign anti-tank mines were enclosed in plastic containers, making them difficult to detect. By combining the explosives from several mines and placing them in tin-cans, the Afghan Mujahideen made them easier to detect. After an IED was exploded, the Afghan Mujahideen often used direct fire weapons such as machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades to continue the attack.

Afghan Mujahideen operating far from the border with Pakistan did not have a ready supply of foreign anti-tank mines. They preferred to make mines from Soviet unexploded ordnance. The anti-tank mines were rarely triggered by pressure fuses. They were almost always remotely detonated. Since the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan, the Taliban and its supporters have used IEDs against American, ISAF, and Afghan military and civilian vehicles. While the number of such attacks has been far lower than those in Iraq, the number has been steadily increasing.

Lebanon

Hezbollah made extensive use of IEDs to attack Israeli forces after Israel's 1982 invasion of Lebanon. Israel withdrew from most of Lebanon in 1985 but still kept troops stationed in a buffer zone in southern Lebanon. Hezbollah frequently used IEDs to attack Israeli vehicles in this area up until the Israeli withdrawal in May 2000.

One such bomb killed Israeli Brigadier General Erez Gerstein on February 28, 1999, the highest-ranking Israeli to die in Lebanon.

Also in the 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict, a Merkava Mark II tank was hit by a Hezbollah IED killing all 4 IDF servicemen on board, the first of two IEDs damaging a Merkava tank.

Chechnya

IEDs have also been popular in Chechnya, where Russian forces are currently engaged in fighting with rebels. While no concrete statistics are available on this matter, bombs have accounted for many Russian deaths in both the First Chechen War (19941996) and the Second (1999–present).

Iraq

This article needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.
File:IED Controlled Explosion.jpg
Controlled explosion of IED, US Army in Iraq.

Beginning in July 2003, the Iraqi insurgency used IEDs to target Coalition vehicles. According to iCasualties.org, 38.6 percent of American casualties in the Iraq War were caused by IEDs. Insurgents now use the bombs to target not only Coalition vehicles, but Iraqi police and civilian transportation as well.

Common locations for placing these bombs in include animal carcasses, soft drink cans, and boxes. Typically they explode underneath or to the side of the vehicle to cause the maximum amount of damage. However, as vehicle armor was improved on military vehicles, insurgents began placing IEDs in elevated positions such as on road signs or trees, in order to hit less protected areas.

IEDs in Iraq may be made with artillery or mortar shells or with varying amounts of bulk or homemade explosives.

Despite the increased armor, IEDs have been killing soldiers with greater frequency. May 2007 was the deadliest month for IED attacks thus far with a reported 89 of the 129 Coalition casualties coming from an IED attack. According to the Pentagon, 250,000 tons (of 650,000 tons total) of Iraqi ordnance were looted, providing a large supply of ammunition for the insurgents.

In October 2005, The UK government charged that Iran was supplying insurgents with the technological know-how to make shaped charges, which focus the blast in a specific direction, and can pierce greater thicknesses of armor with less explosive. Iran has denied this.

Recently, IEDs have been deployed in the form of Explosively Formed Penetrators, a special type of shaped charge that is effective at long standoffs from the target (50 meters or more). These are especially problematic to counter because they can be placed so far from their intended targets.

The British also accused Iran and Hezbollah of teaching Iraqi fighters to use infrared light beams to trigger IEDs. As the occupation forces become more sophisticated in interrupting radio signals around their convoys, the insurgents adapt their triggering methods.

Another form of IEDs being used in Iraq are platter charges, which are rectangular or circular pieces of flat metal (usually steel) weighing a few kilograms with plastic explosives pressed onto one side of the platter. The amount of explosive used is usually equal, by weight, to the weight of the platter. The explosives propel the platter into the target with an approximate velocity of 6,000 ft:s. The effective range can be as far as 50 meters, limited by the accuracy.

See also

External links

References

  1. http://www.history.navy.mil/wars/vietnam/minesouthviet.htm
  2. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/vietnam/series/pt_05.html
  3. http://www.hrw.org/reports/1997/gen1/General-03.htm
  4. http://icasualties.org/oif/stats.aspx
  5. http://icasualties.org/oif/IED.aspx
  6. http://hammernews.com/lootedhopes.htm
  7. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4312516.stm
  8. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4315924.stm
  9. http://nyjtimes.com/cover/11-11-05/IranWarnedNotToMeddle.htm
  10. http://www.worldaffairsboard.com/archive/index.php/t-10384.html
  11. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/army/fm/20-32/chap13b.html
  12. http://govtsecurity.com/mag/stuck_security/
Categories: