| Revision as of 13:03, 4 September 2003 editFuzheado (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, IP block exemptions, Administrators51,190 edits explaining removing neutrality disputed← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:08, 4 September 2003 edit undoVzbs34 (talk | contribs)11,446 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| : I agree, so I've removed the ''neutrality disputed'' note at the beginning, not because this is the perfect article, but I don't think it goes too far in characterizing her for what she is. After all, she calls ''herself'' a polemicist. But I'm willing to hear/see other additions to make this more ''"neutral".'' ] 13:03, 4 Sep 2003 (UTC) | : I agree, so I've removed the ''neutrality disputed'' note at the beginning, not because this is the perfect article, but I don't think it goes too far in characterizing her for what she is. After all, she calls ''herself'' a polemicist. But I'm willing to hear/see other additions to make this more ''"neutral".'' ] 13:03, 4 Sep 2003 (UTC) | ||
| I'm not nessisarily a fan of Coulter's, but I have read a lot of her stuff. As mentioned, her whole "sthick" is being outlandish, controversial, and sensationalistic. She rarely discusses uncontroversial topics, and she's not exactly the type who has written lots of dry articles on why the free market system is superior to socialism or anything like that. Though a self-proclaimed conservative, her writings lack the didactic or historographical material that is often common with other conservative pundits and editorialists. In other words, I'm not sure what kinda stuff to add to make this more "neutral". ] | |||
Revision as of 20:08, 4 September 2003
So the neutrality of this page is disputed, but there are no comments here. Anyone care to chime in? Fuzheado 02:50, 3 Sep 2003 (UTC)
Article lists some of the extreme statementsof a woman who often makes them
Ann Coulter frequently makes extreme statements in her writings and talk-show appearances.
This article appropriately reflects that by quoting some of her extreme statements.
It's not like she rarely makes extreme statements, and this article is un-reflective. Someone could easily add ten more extreme statements she's made in the past few years.
If someone wishes to add sentences to the article about the good things Ann Coulter has said or done, that is fine. It is better than just posting that the neutrality is disputed.
- I agree, so I've removed the neutrality disputed note at the beginning, not because this is the perfect article, but I don't think it goes too far in characterizing her for what she is. After all, she calls herself a polemicist. But I'm willing to hear/see other additions to make this more "neutral". Fuzheado 13:03, 4 Sep 2003 (UTC)
I'm not nessisarily a fan of Coulter's, but I have read a lot of her stuff. As mentioned, her whole "sthick" is being outlandish, controversial, and sensationalistic. She rarely discusses uncontroversial topics, and she's not exactly the type who has written lots of dry articles on why the free market system is superior to socialism or anything like that. Though a self-proclaimed conservative, her writings lack the didactic or historographical material that is often common with other conservative pundits and editorialists. In other words, I'm not sure what kinda stuff to add to make this more "neutral". user:J.J.