| Revision as of 10:47, 20 June 2007 editDumbBOT (talk | contribs)Bots292,843 edits Completing nomination← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:11, 20 June 2007 edit undoMandsford (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators68,452 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| *'''Speedy delete''' per nom, no sources. ] 04:02, 20 June 2007 (UTC) | *'''Speedy delete''' per nom, no sources. ] 04:02, 20 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :*This AfD nomination was ]. It is listed now. ] 10:47, 20 June 2007 (UTC) | :*This AfD nomination was ]. It is listed now. ] 10:47, 20 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Strong Keep''' This is called judging a book by it's cover. I hadn't heard of Jurispedia until the article, but it's obvious that the short text will increase. The website is "inspired by Misplaced Pages" and copies its format; surfing to it is like ending up in a parallel universe run by attorneys. | |||
| However, unlike a lot of other sites that take a Wiki article verbatim and call it their own, Jurispedia at least acknowledges that it's imitating Wiki. I can only surmise that the reason that Wiki hasn't sued Jurispedia is that this legal research site got permission. Or Misplaced Pages overlooks these things "pro bono" (for the greater good). ] 11:11, 20 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:11, 20 June 2007
Jurispedia
Short, unsourced article on website with no claims to notability. Wyington Duarm 21:39, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom, no sources. Mynglestine 04:02, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 10:47, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Keep This is called judging a book by it's cover. I hadn't heard of Jurispedia until the article, but it's obvious that the short text will increase. The website is "inspired by Misplaced Pages" and copies its format; surfing to it is like ending up in a parallel universe run by attorneys.
However, unlike a lot of other sites that take a Wiki article verbatim and call it their own, Jurispedia at least acknowledges that it's imitating Wiki. I can only surmise that the reason that Wiki hasn't sued Jurispedia is that this legal research site got permission. Or Misplaced Pages overlooks these things "pro bono" (for the greater good). Mandsford 11:11, 20 June 2007 (UTC)