Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Jurispedia: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:26, 20 June 2007 editPinball22 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,529 edits Free speech, not beer...← Previous edit Revision as of 14:35, 20 June 2007 edit undoEdtropolis (talk | contribs)401 editsm []Next edit →
Line 7: Line 7:
However, unlike a lot of other sites that take a Wiki article verbatim and call it their own, Jurispedia at least acknowledges that it's imitating Wiki. I can only surmise that the reason that Wiki hasn't sued Jurispedia is that this legal research site got permission. Or Misplaced Pages overlooks these things "pro bono" (for the greater good). ] 11:11, 20 June 2007 (UTC) However, unlike a lot of other sites that take a Wiki article verbatim and call it their own, Jurispedia at least acknowledges that it's imitating Wiki. I can only surmise that the reason that Wiki hasn't sued Jurispedia is that this legal research site got permission. Or Misplaced Pages overlooks these things "pro bono" (for the greater good). ] 11:11, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
:*'''Comment'''. Ok, that may have been a joke, but since you're a relatively new user, Mandsford, I feel compelled to mention the ] in case it wasn't and you actually don't realize the wide freedom to reuse content granted by Misplaced Pages's ] licensing. ] 14:26, 20 June 2007 (UTC) :*'''Comment'''. Ok, that may have been a joke, but since you're a relatively new user, Mandsford, I feel compelled to mention the ] in case it wasn't and you actually don't realize the wide freedom to reuse content granted by Misplaced Pages's ] licensing. ] 14:26, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
*'''Speedy Keep'''. per comment. Notable government wiki. --] 14:35, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:35, 20 June 2007

Jurispedia

Short, unsourced article on website with no claims to notability. Wyington Duarm 21:39, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Strong Keep This is called judging a book by it's cover. I hadn't heard of Jurispedia until the article, but it's obvious that the short text will increase. The website is "inspired by Misplaced Pages" and copies its format; surfing to it is like ending up in a parallel universe run by attorneys.

However, unlike a lot of other sites that take a Wiki article verbatim and call it their own, Jurispedia at least acknowledges that it's imitating Wiki. I can only surmise that the reason that Wiki hasn't sued Jurispedia is that this legal research site got permission. Or Misplaced Pages overlooks these things "pro bono" (for the greater good). Mandsford 11:11, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Comment. Ok, that may have been a joke, but since you're a relatively new user, Mandsford, I feel compelled to mention the policy on copyrights in case it wasn't and you actually don't realize the wide freedom to reuse content granted by Misplaced Pages's GFDL licensing. Pinball22 14:26, 20 June 2007 (UTC)