Revision as of 22:03, 20 June 2007 editBobby Bigrock (talk | contribs)20 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:10, 20 June 2007 edit undoZurishaddai (talk | contribs)2,641 edits Revert to the revision prior to revision 139523273 dated 2007-06-20 22:03:32 by Bobby Bigrock using popupsNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{usercomment}} | |||
'''AN IMPORTANT MESSAGE ABOUT ]''' | |||
''''''. Please add four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) at the end of your message; this will create an identifying signature and timestamp. | |||
{{archive box|]. ]. ].}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
{{POTD}} | |||
{{User:Ryulong/CPenguin}} | |||
'''Tools:'''<br> | |||
*Vandalcleaning: | |||
**] | |||
** | |||
** | |||
**] | |||
*AfD: ] | |||
*Stub Sorting: ] | |||
*My Sandbox: ] | |||
*Vandalism warning: | |||
**<nowiki>{{subst:uw-vandalism1|PageName}} ~~~~ (unintentional vandalism/test)</nowiki> | |||
**<nowiki>{{subst:uw-delete1|PageName}} ~~~~ (unintentional removal of content) </nowiki> | |||
**<nowiki>{{subst:uw-vandalism2|PageName}} ~~~~ (suitable for nonsense) </nowiki> | |||
**<nowiki>{{subst:uw-delete2|PageName}} ~~~~ (variant for blankings) </nowiki> | |||
**<nowiki>{{subst:uw-vandalism3|PageName}} ~~~~ (please stop) </nowiki> | |||
**<nowiki>{{subst:uw-delete3|PageName}} ~~~~ (please stop blanking) </nowiki> | |||
**<nowiki>{{subst:uw-vandalism4|PageName}} ~~~~ (last warning) </nowiki> | |||
**<nowiki>{{subst:uw-delete4|PageName}} ~~~~ (last warning for blanking) </nowiki> | |||
**<nowiki>{{subst:uw-vandalism4im}} ~~~~ (Only warning: severe) </nowiki> | |||
*Block requests: ] | |||
*Incident reporting: ] | |||
*Greeting: <nowiki>{{subst:Welcome-personal|Gaff|Happy editing!|~~~~}}</nowiki> | |||
* ] | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
'''PLEASE READ CAREFULLY''' | |||
|maxarchivesize = 150K | |||
|counter = 3 | |||
|algo = old(7d) | |||
|archive = User talk:Gaff/Archive%(counter)d | |||
}} | |||
---- | |||
== Woody Guthrie == | |||
Thanks for the Good Article listing! I actually have not edited a ton on this article, but have followed it for a while and realized that it has a lot of potential. Its the first time that I have listed an article for Good Article status, so its great to see that it held up to review. I'll keep grinding away to improve it more. <em>—<font color="Indigo">]</font> <sup><small><b><font color="MediumSlateBlue">]</font></b></small></sup></em> 07:54, 13 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
==What is Misplaced Pages?== | |||
: This was actually my first foray into the Good Article process as well. There were a couple items on my watchlist that I thought were in pretty good shape. As I read the Good Article criteria, I realized that there are actually probably tens of thousands of articles on Misplaced Pages that are "Good" and just haven't been nominated or approved yet. I think ] is somewhere I'll start focusing more efforts (it's definitely a more positive and constructive corner of the Wiki than AFD!) --] 15:05, 13 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
'''What is Misplaced Pages?''' | |||
== My recent RfA == | |||
An essay by '''Bobby Boulders''' | |||
Thanks for your support and defense in my recent, unsuccessful RfA. It's much appreciated. ] 16:00, 14 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
President, '''International Society of Vandals''' (ISV) | |||
hi the editor guy said i vandalized a page and im sorry. | |||
== Gnome Week == | |||
Misplaced Pages is a sham. It is a sham not only because it does not accomplish its stated goals as a project, but also because its stated goals and its intent are clearly at odds with one another. In other words, it is a hypocritical product claiming to be something that it is not, never has been, and never will allow itself to become. | |||
{| class="messagebox standard-talk" | |||
| | |||
| <center><big>'''], unite!'''</big> | |||
|- | |||
| ] | |||
| Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}! You are invited to participate in ''']''', a mass article cleanup drive between June 21 and June 28, 2007.</center> | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
| This week, ] will be cleared. Articles will be ]. ] will be fixed. ] will be edited. ] will be sourced. No article will be safe from our reach! The more people who participate, the better Misplaced Pages will become as a result. | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
| I would love it if you would participate! - ]] | |||
|- | |||
| <small></small> | |||
|} | |||
== Thanks == | |||
Hi Gaff, Thank you for your comments at my RfA. Let me know if I can help you and feel free to let me know if I mess up anywhere. Cheers. ] 03:05, 17 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
But don't take my word for it. Let us first evaluate the '''stated''', primary goal of the Misplaced Pages project, and then contrast that goal with the '''reality''' of the project. As defined on the ] information page, Misplaced Pages purports to be a "...multilingual, web-based, free content encyclopedia project...written collaboratively by volunteers; the vast majority of its articles can be edited by anyone with access to the Internet." | |||
== my RFA == | |||
Thank you for supporting ]. I hope I will live up to your expectation. Let me know if you need any help, or I make any mistake. --] (球球PK) (] | ]) 23:43, 17 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
First, let us debunk the notion of Misplaced Pages as "free-content" encyclopedia. "Free content," as Misplaced Pages itself defines the term, is "...any kind of functional work, artwork, or other creative content having no...significant restriction relative to people's freedom to use, redistribute, and modify the content." This term is a noble one, but it is patently false when applied to Misplaced Pages. Misplaced Pages is not, in fact, a "free content" site. A significant percentage of Misplaced Pages pages cannot be edited by anyone. Many are "protected" or "restricted" from editing or distribution. Furthermore, there are many significant restrictions, legal or otherwise, to posting and editing content on this site. Users cannot post materials culled from other sources, for instance; photos, in particular, come under frequent and derisive scrutiny by administrators when uploaded to the site. Many additions are removed almost immediately by these administrators, and/or are "nominated for deletion" after being arbitrarily labeled as "nonsense." "Nonsense?" In what free society, or free social project, can there exist a governing body capable of dismissing any and all users' contributions to that project or society as "nonsense?" True "nonsense" is the idea of a free, ostensibly collaborative project in which access to collaboration is limited to a ruling elite (i.e., the administrators and tenured editors). | |||
== ''Signpost'' updated for June 18th, 2007. == | |||
{| width="90%" cellspacing="0" align="center" style="background-color:transparent;" | |||
This brings us to the second half of Misplaced Pages's stated purpose: to be a site whose "vast majority" of articles "...can be edited by anyone with access to the Internet." Again, this statement is nice on paper but is not put into practice on Misplaced Pages. Vast numbers of would-be contributors using ISPs such as America Online (AOL) are not permitted to edit or contribute to Misplaced Pages. Plenty more users are blocked from editing or contributing because their IP ranges have been blocked in the name of preventing vandalism. These blocks are often arbitrary, meaningless, and collaterally damaging beyond all reason. If a handful of vandals have used AOL to vandalize the site, why should the millions of other AOL users suffer blockage or prevention as a result? Thus, we see that certainly not "anyone with access to the Internet" can edit Misplaced Pages. Nor can most anyone with editing privileges. As stated earlier, the majority of new contributions and edits are reverted by administrators within a matter of seconds. "Vandalism warnings" are slapped upon new users after such reversions, regardless of the new users' intent to vandalize or to contribute productively to the Misplaced Pages project. These administrators collude with their own to maintain a powerful grip over the flow of information on Misplaced Pages. They curry influence and favor with tenured users and with one another. They control the free flow of information on Misplaced Pages by preventing and/or reverting 95% of new contributions and edits to articles on the site. They impede the collaborative nature of the site by bottlenecking the collaborative editing process. As such, most of what exists on Misplaced Pages today is not "free content" written "collaboratively by volunteers," but instead is restricted and limited content written and/or policed by a ruling class who hold themselves above and in contempt of the common userbase. | |||
! ]<font style="position: relative; top: .3em; font-size: 250%;">'''Weekly Delivery'''</font> | |||
|} | |||
<br> | |||
{| width="90%" cellspacing="0" align="center" style="background-color:transparent;" | |||
|- | |||
| colspan=3 | | |||
---- | |||
|- | |||
| align="left" | '''Volume 3, Issue 25''' || align ="center" | '''] ]''' || align="right" | ''']''' | |||
|- | |||
| colspan=3 align=center | | |||
---- | |||
|} | |||
{| align="center" cellspacing="20" width=90% style="background-color:transparent;" | |||
| colspan=3 align="center" | ''']''' | |||
|- | |||
| width=50% | ] | |||
| width=50% | ] | |||
|- | |||
| width=50% | ] | |||
| width=50% | ] | |||
|- | |||
| width=50% | ] | |||
| width=50% | ] | |||
|- | |||
| width=50% | ] | |||
| width=50% | ] | |||
|} | |||
{| width="90%" cellspacing="0" align="center" style="background-color:transparent;" | |||
| colspan=2 | | |||
---- | |||
|- | |||
| align="left" | ''']''' | ] | ] | ] | ] | |||
| align = "right" | <small>] : ]</small> | |||
|- | |||
| colspan=2 | | |||
---- | |||
|} | |||
<small>You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the ]. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. ] 08:37, 19 June 2007 (UTC)</small> | |||
What is to be done about this situation? Can Misplaced Pages ever truly be a "free content" encyclopedia, as it allegedly claims to be? Most certainly it can be, and one might hope, will be. But it will not become a free-content enterprise by its own devices. It must be forced into freedom by the loving and violent hand of you, the Misplaced Pages user. You must radicalize yourself and become an agent of freedom and of positive change. In short, you must vandalize Misplaced Pages to the best extent that you are able. Everyone must rise up and, to put it mildly, make life a 'living hell' for the current administration of Misplaced Pages. You must drive these administrative elite out of the project. You must force them to tire of reverting your vandalism. You must drive them off en masse. You must force ] to realize that the very people he has appointed to rule his so-called "free" project are curtailing the freedom of that project. You must bring about change in such a fashion, because if you do not, no change can or will occur. | |||
And so I ask you: do you consider yourself a champion of freedom? Do you enjoy the idea of Misplaced Pages but loathe its current execution of that idea? If so, it is your civic responsibility to reform this site through radical and revolutionary means. I encourate you to vandalize this site freely and without restriction as to the nature, content, or extent of your vandalism. If you feel the need, please repost this essay in your vandalized pages. Encourage others to join in. Spread the word. | |||
You have nothing to lose but your freedom. | |||
Sincerely, | |||
Bobby Boulders | |||
imwithbobby@yahoo.com | |||
To join the International Society of Vandals, or for further information about the revolutionary overthrow of the Misplaced Pages administrators, please e-mail Bobby at imwithbobby@yahoo.com. Bobby Boulders believes in you, the free user, and will answer any and all correspondence personally and in a timely manner. |
Revision as of 22:10, 20 June 2007
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
Click here to leave me a new message.. Please add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your message; this will create an identifying signature and timestamp.
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
User:Ryulong/CPenguin
Tools:
- Vandalcleaning:
- AfD: Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion
- Stub Sorting: Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types
- My Sandbox: User:Gaff/Sandbox
- Vandalism warning:
- {{subst:uw-vandalism1|PageName}} ~~~~ (unintentional vandalism/test)
- {{subst:uw-delete1|PageName}} ~~~~ (unintentional removal of content)
- {{subst:uw-vandalism2|PageName}} ~~~~ (suitable for nonsense)
- {{subst:uw-delete2|PageName}} ~~~~ (variant for blankings)
- {{subst:uw-vandalism3|PageName}} ~~~~ (please stop)
- {{subst:uw-delete3|PageName}} ~~~~ (please stop blanking)
- {{subst:uw-vandalism4|PageName}} ~~~~ (last warning)
- {{subst:uw-delete4|PageName}} ~~~~ (last warning for blanking)
- {{subst:uw-vandalism4im}} ~~~~ (Only warning: severe)
- Block requests: en.wikipedia new request
- Incident reporting: Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
- Greeting: {{subst:Welcome-personal|Gaff|Happy editing!|~~~~}}
- Image tags
Woody Guthrie
Thanks for the Good Article listing! I actually have not edited a ton on this article, but have followed it for a while and realized that it has a lot of potential. Its the first time that I have listed an article for Good Article status, so its great to see that it held up to review. I'll keep grinding away to improve it more. —Gaff 07:54, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- This was actually my first foray into the Good Article process as well. There were a couple items on my watchlist that I thought were in pretty good shape. As I read the Good Article criteria, I realized that there are actually probably tens of thousands of articles on Misplaced Pages that are "Good" and just haven't been nominated or approved yet. I think WP:GA is somewhere I'll start focusing more efforts (it's definitely a more positive and constructive corner of the Wiki than AFD!) --JayHenry 15:05, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
My recent RfA
Thanks for your support and defense in my recent, unsuccessful RfA. It's much appreciated. IvoShandor 16:00, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
hi the editor guy said i vandalized a page and im sorry.
Gnome Week
File:P1000744.jpg | Hello, Gaff! You are invited to participate in Gnome Week, a mass article cleanup drive between June 21 and June 28, 2007. |
This week, backlogs will be cleared. Articles will be polished. Typos will be fixed. Bad prose will be edited. Unreferenced articles will be sourced. No article will be safe from our reach! The more people who participate, the better Misplaced Pages will become as a result. | |
I would love it if you would participate! - (lemonflash) | |
Edit message |
Thanks
Hi Gaff, Thank you for your comments at my RfA. Let me know if I can help you and feel free to let me know if I mess up anywhere. Cheers. Shyamal 03:05, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
my RFA
Thank you for supporting my RFA. I hope I will live up to your expectation. Let me know if you need any help, or I make any mistake. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 23:43, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 18th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 25 | 18 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:37, 19 June 2007 (UTC)