Misplaced Pages

User:Daddy Kindsoul: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:31, 22 June 2007 editDaddy Kindsoul (talk | contribs)19,776 edits removing some defacement of my bar and Punk project box; I don't care what you "appreciate", I'd rather follow policy thanks.← Previous edit Revision as of 19:04, 22 June 2007 edit undoMerope (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,200 edits spam notice and prank bar removed again, per policies.Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="usermessage">You have ] (]).</div>
<table style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; margin-bottom: 0.5em; width: 242px; border: #99B3FF solid 1px">
<tr><td><div style="float: left; border: solid #000000 1px; margin: 1px;">
{| cellspacing="0" style="width: 238px; color: #ffffff; background: #ffffff;" {| cellspacing="0" style="width: 238px; color: #ffffff; background: #ffffff;"
| style="width: 45px; height: 45px; background: #ffffff; text-align: center; font-size: 14pt; color: #ffffff;" | | style="width: 45px; height: 45px; background: #ffffff; text-align: center; font-size: 14pt; color: #ffffff;" |
Line 14: Line 11:
'''Old messages will be archived once read, thanks.''' '''Old messages will be archived once read, thanks.'''
*] *]
'''Note''' - Automated bots are not welcome on my talkpage, I consider edits by bots to be ] and will be deleted. Any other form of spamming will be automatically removed from the page too.
==]== ==]==
I suggest you look at our Fair Use policy before reinserting Images that do not qualify for Fair Use back into articles. Thank you! — ] ] 13:37, 22 June 2007 (UTC) I suggest you look at our Fair Use policy before reinserting Images that do not qualify for Fair Use back into articles. Thank you! — ] ] 13:37, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Line 31: Line 27:


Its seems my humourous and within policy bar was removed by accident, not to worry I've brought it back for you. - ] 18:05, 22 June 2007 (UTC) Its seems my humourous and within policy bar was removed by accident, not to worry I've brought it back for you. - ] 18:05, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
::Actually, ] states: "Games, roleplaying sessions, and other things pertaining to 'entertainment' rather than 'writing an encyclopedia'" are things that you should ''not'' have on your userpage. As such, I have removed the bar again. Many editors have just today mentioned that they do not like it; your persistence in keeping it amid these objections shows a decided lack of civility.

::As for the "spam" notice, individuals do not set WP policy--the community does. Automated messages are perfectly acceptable within the scope of ] and ]. Your refusal to acknowledge them can be construed as ].

::Please take a moment to consider your actions and whether or not you want to continue being willfully combative. Cheers. -- ] 19:04, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:04, 22 June 2007

This user is a participant in WikiProject Punk music.
This user is a participant in WikiProject Football.

Old messages will be archived once read, thanks.

The Mission (band)

I suggest you look at our Fair Use policy before reinserting Images that do not qualify for Fair Use back into articles. Thank you! — Moe ε 13:37, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

I suggest you stop. Our Fair Use policy, specially #3a and 8 says that the use of decorative Fair Use images is against policy and the the number of Fair Use images to be minimal. The Sex Pistols article you references is not a valid example. It has critical text next to the album covers, and qualifies per Fair Use and the fact is, this article does not. Having formatted to appear next to a year and some question marks does not. Try putting some of the album covers in with some relevant text and maybe it will qualify with Fair Use, otherwise it is going to be removed like every other disocgraphy on Misplaced Pages. You're interpretation of vandalism is not accurate either, I am a user in good standing, and your lacking some good faith. — Moe ε 13:48, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Personal attacks

Please comment on articles, not other editors. If you continue to harass our editors and edit war over articles, you will be blocked in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for disruption. Shadow1 (talk) 15:04, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

message box

I have removed the "prank message" box from the top of your page. --After Midnight 15:45, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Bots/spam

Howdy! Because of your assertion regarding bots (which don't read the messages quite yet), I'd just like to leave a quick notification about the importance of licenses. If you remove licensing alert messages from bots, it'll be accepted that you're aware of the issue they've notified you of, and if you continue to violate the copyright policies going forward, you'll be blocked to protect the project. Thanks! - CHAIRBOY () 17:49, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

I'm very much aware of how to upload images correcly thanks and even fix others that I haven't uploaded from time to time to. I just do not appreciate it when certain users/bots spam my talk with tags, that are of their own doing (ie-blanking images from articles, etc). - The Daddy 17:56, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Its seems my humourous and within policy bar was removed by accident, not to worry I've brought it back for you. - The Daddy 18:05, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Actually, WP:UP#NOT states: "Games, roleplaying sessions, and other things pertaining to 'entertainment' rather than 'writing an encyclopedia'" are things that you should not have on your userpage. As such, I have removed the bar again. Many editors have just today mentioned that they do not like it; your persistence in keeping it amid these objections shows a decided lack of civility.
As for the "spam" notice, individuals do not set WP policy--the community does. Automated messages are perfectly acceptable within the scope of WP:SPAM and WP:CANVASS. Your refusal to acknowledge them can be construed as disruptive.
Please take a moment to consider your actions and whether or not you want to continue being willfully combative. Cheers. -- Merope 19:04, 22 June 2007 (UTC)