Misplaced Pages

User talk:Miranda: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:40, 23 June 2007 editMiranda (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers34,620 edits Banner, citations: respond← Previous edit Revision as of 04:40, 23 June 2007 edit undoTrey (talk | contribs)Rollbackers3,982 edits General note: Refactoring others' talk page comments. using TWNext edit →
Line 69: Line 69:
::I disagree with you about the access date. The information for the cite web template indicates "accessdate: Full date when item was accessed. Can you point me to the wikipedia policy where you obtained your understanding. Thanks--] 16:33, 22 June 2007 (UTC) ::I disagree with you about the access date. The information for the cite web template indicates "accessdate: Full date when item was accessed. Can you point me to the wikipedia policy where you obtained your understanding. Thanks--] 16:33, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
:::Don't change the access date for anything. Common knowledge dictates that a file from a specific version can change because new facts are constantly being updated. For example, Friday's version differs from Tuesday's version. I have based the facts on the May 9th date, and changing the access date will not correlate with the facts with the article. Please don't do it again. '''<font color="#990066" face="georgia">]</font>''' 03:40, 23 June 2007 (UTC) :::Don't change the access date for anything. Common knowledge dictates that a file from a specific version can change because new facts are constantly being updated. For example, Friday's version differs from Tuesday's version. I have based the facts on the May 9th date, and changing the access date will not correlate with the facts with the article. Please don't do it again. '''<font color="#990066" face="georgia">]</font>''' 03:40, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

== June 2007 ==
{{{icon|] }}}Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|, as you did at ],}} is considered ], even if you meant well. Take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-tpv1 --> --<span style="font-family: Century Gothic;">]</span> 04:40, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:40, 23 June 2007

User talk:Real96/header

template ads

hi miranda, I was looking at Image:Peru Maps JMK Team.gif and thought it could be used in the template ads, I would add it by myself but I think there says it needs your approval --Andersmusician $ 04:42, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Too small. I can make it bigger, though. Miranda 04:44, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
I will come up with a new ad. Tell me what you would like for the ad, and I will try to make it. Miranda 06:43, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
great, well I wonder if images from Image:Peru_Portal.png would show properly on a gif file. --Andersmusician $ 16:07, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

WikiAd + A smile

I hope your mood improves. Have a great day! Defender 911 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Can you or someone else make a Misplaced Pages ad for this please? If not, thanks anyway. Have a nice day! :) --Defender 911 15:59, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

It's not on Misplaced Pages Mainspace yet. Sorry. Miranda 19:57, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Well, thanks anyway. --Defender 911 09:57, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
P.S. Next time, tell me on my talk page. The "New Messages" template was made for a reason.
P.P.S. Accept the smile please! I hope your mood gets better!
Thanks for the smiles. You should ask Andrew to merge your ideas with Misplaced Pages:Wikiproject User Help. Miranda 10:14, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Can do. :) --Defender 911 10:18, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User talk:84.71.192.107

I've nominated User talk:84.71.192.107, a page you created, for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:84.71.192.107 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User talk:84.71.192.107 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Kurt Shaped Box 22:37, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, but I didn't create this. I only warned the user. Miranda 23:16, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Um...

What is ENRAGED mean on your Mood-o-meter?-- PNiddy-~ // 03:25, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

It means, quit trolling on my page and contribute to the encyclopedia. Miranda 03:28, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, but recent history tells me that you are a loser. I would prefer it if you didn't reply, so you could "quit trolling on my page and contribute to the encyclopedia". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boyleharry (talkcontribs)
This seems like it's a good place to try again.

Hope the meter doesn't go all the way to explosive! Have a great day! Defender 911has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Re: Image for Qxz ads.

From User talk:HiB2Bornot2B:

I would have appreciated if you brought this issue to me first before making your ad, as a common courtesy. I may make another version of this ad in order to conform to other state projects, such as Pennsylvania.

Miranda, you don't own the ad template, any more than I do. There's no requirement that the various ads match each other, and there's certainly no need for everything to be approved by you. Remember that this is a wiki; add to, modify or remove other people's work as you see fit, but don't hold them back from contributing.

In this case, the source image he used is in the public domain, so attribution is not required. It's encouraged, for convenience purposes, but he was doing nothing wrong by not including attribution; thus insisting you'll have to make another version of the ad, and berating him for not checking with you first is a bad idea. (Attribution is required when an image's license specifies it – as is the case with most Creative Commons licenses – but this is not the case with public domain images).

The image seems to me to be no more confusing or loud than some of your own – and if you don't like it, just edit it to be more subtle. Someone else can always revert your changes if they disagree with them – Gurchzilla 11:48, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Also, since when are ads for pages outside project space not allowed? The only reason we don't have any so far (other than one Portal and one Help page) is that nobody's asked for one. No reason someone can't make ads for something else Gurchzilla 11:53, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Gurch, first, I would have appreciated if he would have asked me if he wanted me to make an ad, before making it, because first, the formatting issues, and second, the wikicode. Second, the source image needed to be sourced in order to see if the banner violated fair use. Third, I haven't seen you creating an ad recently. Fourth, I really don't have time for your "Gurchzilla rah-rah-rah" drama, because I got other things to do. I am not going to waste my time correcting an ad for which a person spent time to create if there is not a blatant fair use violation. Miranda 14:50, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Assume, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, that the license the user has provided is correct. At no point did I say "Gurchzilla rah-rah-rah". This is a separate account, one that I'm making edits from today because this is a public terminal; I don't want my real account compromised, but couldn't care less what happens to this one – Gurchzilla 15:59, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, but I can't assume, I have to verify, so that Misplaced Pages won't get into trouble. And, I thought Gurchzilla is Gurch on puberty, hence the comment. Miranda 16:19, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

67.34.213.123

I am the anonymous IP address which added the info th Alpha Kappa Alpha article. I hadn't realized I hadn't signed in before I made the initial edit. I received you message that you have reverted my experiment. I'm not sure what I addded that was experimental or vandalism. Can you be more specific? Thanks.--Ccson 13:08, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Changing the citation date, but I blanked the warning. So, the situation should be fine, now. Miranda 15:04, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
The access date is not just set for the first time the citation is added. An editor can and should change the access date each time the reference is accessed and the editor verifies the information to be still correct. I did link to the quick facts website and that's why i changed the date. If I access another link and the inforamtion is found to be correct, I will change the accessdate since that will be the date of the acesss.--Ccson 16:27, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Banner, citations

I added the banner because the NPHC is included is a civic org, of which AKA is a member.

What is it about the citations that I changed that you don't like? I thought anyone could update an article? thanksx--Ccson 13:14, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

The banner should be added last, IMHO, because it messes up the format of the citations. Second, when you retrieve a source, like I did on the ninth, you don't change the date of the source when it was last accessed, but, when the source was first accessed and placed in the article. Yes, anyone can update an article, but I am cautious of vandalism by aspirants of the sorority. Thanks for understanding. Miranda 15:04, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
I disagree with you about the access date. The information for the cite web template indicates "accessdate: Full date when item was accessed. Can you point me to the wikipedia policy where you obtained your understanding. Thanks--Ccson 16:33, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Don't change the access date for anything. Common knowledge dictates that a file from a specific version can change because new facts are constantly being updated. For example, Friday's version differs from Tuesday's version. I have based the facts on the May 9th date, and changing the access date will not correlate with the facts with the article. Please don't do it again. Miranda 03:40, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

June 2007

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --trey 04:40, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Category: