| Revision as of 18:22, 23 June 2007 edit67.135.49.29 (talk) Undid revision 140148563 by Until(1 == 2) (talk)← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:15, 24 June 2007 edit undoTcrow777 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,327 edits →RETIRED. GOODBYE AND GOOD RIDDANCE, WIKIPEDIANext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| 1) Wiki really does have a liberal bias (duh!) | 1) Wiki really does have a liberal bias (duh!) | ||
| 2) People can put any |
2) People can put any (- - - -) information they want there no matter how faulty as long as it's "published" somewhere by someone or backed by lame-(- - -) "proof" (like what a person's organization's website sells) | ||
| 3) As long as you have the letters "p," "h" and "d" after your name in that order, anything you say no matter how wrong, biased, unsupported or just plain stupid becomes gospel truth on Wiki if someone somewhere reproduced it online | 3) As long as you have the letters "p," "h" and "d" after your name in that order, anything you say no matter how wrong, biased, unsupported or just plain stupid becomes gospel truth on Wiki if someone somewhere reproduced it online | ||
Revision as of 05:15, 24 June 2007
RETIRED. GOODBYE AND GOOD RIDDANCE, WIKIPEDIA
What I've learned about Misplaced Pages:
1) Wiki really does have a liberal bias (duh!)
2) People can put any (- - - -) information they want there no matter how faulty as long as it's "published" somewhere by someone or backed by lame-(- - -) "proof" (like what a person's organization's website sells)
3) As long as you have the letters "p," "h" and "d" after your name in that order, anything you say no matter how wrong, biased, unsupported or just plain stupid becomes gospel truth on Wiki if someone somewhere reproduced it online
4) Liberals can defend their edits without repercussions but if a conservative does so, they are accused of edit warring, trolling, vandalism, disruption, etc.
5) As long as you can call in your buddies, you can sidestep the 3 revert rule and indefinitely defend your edits
6) If one of your buddies is an admin, all the better
7) See: D. James Kennedy (who apparently is a supporter of Intelligent Design now instead of a Bible-based, 6-literal-days, 6000-year-old-Earth, life-created-as-is Creationist)