Misplaced Pages

User:Jinxmchue: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:30, 24 June 2007 editCrockspot (talk | contribs)8,746 editsm Reverted to revision 140148696 by 67.135.49.29; I confirmed the IP editor's ID as Jinxmchue, this is how he want's the page. using TW← Previous edit Revision as of 05:32, 24 June 2007 edit undoCrockspot (talk | contribs)8,746 edits noticeNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
== ID confirmed ==
I have confirmed through off wiki private message that 67.135.49.29 is User:Jinxmchue . Please do not revert this page. - ] 05:32, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

== RETIRED. GOODBYE AND GOOD RIDDANCE, WIKIPEDIA == == RETIRED. GOODBYE AND GOOD RIDDANCE, WIKIPEDIA ==



Revision as of 05:32, 24 June 2007

ID confirmed

I have confirmed through off wiki private message that 67.135.49.29 is User:Jinxmchue . Please do not revert this page. - Crockspot 05:32, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

RETIRED. GOODBYE AND GOOD RIDDANCE, WIKIPEDIA

What I've learned about Misplaced Pages:

1) Wiki really does have a liberal bias (duh!)

2) People can put any damn information they want there no matter how faulty as long as it's "published" somewhere by someone or backed by lame-ass "proof" (like what a person's organization's website sells)

3) As long as you have the letters "p," "h" and "d" after your name in that order, anything you say no matter how wrong, biased, unsupported or just plain stupid becomes gospel truth on Wiki if someone somewhere reproduced it online

4) Liberals can defend their edits without repercussions but if a conservative does so, they are accused of edit warring, trolling, vandalism, disruption, etc.

5) As long as you can call in your buddies, you can sidestep the 3 revert rule and indefinitely defend your edits

6) If one of your buddies is an admin, all the better

7) See: D. James Kennedy (who apparently is a supporter of Intelligent Design now instead of a Bible-based, 6-literal-days, 6000-year-old-Earth, life-created-as-is Creationist)