| Revision as of 21:19, 24 June 2007 editMcr616 (talk | contribs)1,647 edits Undid revision 140379687 by 72.128.88.130 (talk)← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:21, 24 June 2007 edit undo72.128.88.130 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| *Having interacted with this user on multiple occasions, I was curious as to see the full of this user's contributions. I would say you are doing a good job overall with your contributions, you have interacted with users, have fought vandalism, and you also have some article work. You have a nice count in the Misplaced Pages namespace as well. I also see you have taken some action in helping your low edit summary usage, did you change it to forced in your preferences? If not I suggest that. I believe if you have an RfA now I do not believe it would succeed. You do not have much experience and generally people will look for a couple more thousand edits. You have been editing consistently for about 5 months now, I'd suggest waiting a couple more months then go for another editor review then consider adminiship. I could also suggest you checking out ] if you have not already. Overall I think you are on the right track and in the future could make a fine administrator. <font style="arial: ridge 2px #FF0000;">''' ] '''</b></i></font><sup><small>]</sup></u></small> | <sub>]</sub> 17:58, 31 May 2007 (UTC) | *Having interacted with this user on multiple occasions, I was curious as to see the full of this user's contributions. I would say you are doing a good job overall with your contributions, you have interacted with users, have fought vandalism, and you also have some article work. You have a nice count in the Misplaced Pages namespace as well. I also see you have taken some action in helping your low edit summary usage, did you change it to forced in your preferences? If not I suggest that. I believe if you have an RfA now I do not believe it would succeed. You do not have much experience and generally people will look for a couple more thousand edits. You have been editing consistently for about 5 months now, I'd suggest waiting a couple more months then go for another editor review then consider adminiship. I could also suggest you checking out ] if you have not already. Overall I think you are on the right track and in the future could make a fine administrator. <font style="arial: ridge 2px #FF0000;">''' ] '''</b></i></font><sup><small>]</sup></u></small> | <sub>]</sub> 17:58, 31 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *I think that you could have handled your "issue" with ] much more gracefully. Snippy comments are never helpful, and your overall tone was disrespectful. You need to learn to deal with vandals much, much better. Your overall performance: slightly below average. And as for the above user's comment that you could make a fine administrator-- you're going to need to learn the blocking policy and proper use of warnings and AIV first. ] 18:31, 24 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Also, the way you sanitize your Editor Review page reflects poorly on you. Remove this again, and you've violated 3RR. Got it? ] 21:21, 24 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ''' Comments ''' | ''' Comments ''' | ||
Revision as of 21:21, 24 June 2007
mcr616
mcr616 (talk · contribs) I've been mulling over an RfA and just wanted to see what people think I can do to improve myself. mcr616 Speak! 22:09, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Reviews
- Having interacted with this user on multiple occasions, I was curious as to see the full of this user's contributions. I would say you are doing a good job overall with your contributions, you have interacted with users, have fought vandalism, and you also have some article work. You have a nice count in the Misplaced Pages namespace as well. I also see you have taken some action in helping your low edit summary usage, did you change it to forced in your preferences? If not I suggest that. I believe if you have an RfA now I do not believe it would succeed. You do not have much experience and generally people will look for a couple more thousand edits. You have been editing consistently for about 5 months now, I'd suggest waiting a couple more months then go for another editor review then consider adminiship. I could also suggest you checking out Misplaced Pages:Admin coaching if you have not already. Overall I think you are on the right track and in the future could make a fine administrator. Orfen | Contribs 17:58, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
- I think that you could have handled your "issue" with User:12.207.12.28 much more gracefully. Snippy comments are never helpful, and your overall tone was disrespectful. You need to learn to deal with vandals much, much better. Your overall performance: slightly below average. And as for the above user's comment that you could make a fine administrator-- you're going to need to learn the blocking policy and proper use of warnings and AIV first. 72.128.88.130 18:31, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- Also, the way you sanitize your Editor Review page reflects poorly on you. Remove this again, and you've violated 3RR. Got it? 72.128.88.130 21:21, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments
- View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.
- View this user's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool
Questions
- Of your contributions to Misplaced Pages, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- I'm really happy with everything I've done for the My Chemical Romance-related articles and WP:MCR. I helped with a major revamp of the project (created the outreach, newsletter and portal sections) and I've also helped with many different issues over at The Black Parade. mcr616 Speak! 22:15, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- I've only really had one bad editing conflict. It was over The Black Parade's neutrality. I tried my best to deal with it, but frankly, the user was a troll, and I told him so. I hope to deal with stuff like that better in the future. mcr616 Speak! 22:15, 17 May 2007 (UTC)