| Revision as of 14:22, 6 August 2002 editUriyan (talk | contribs)1,634 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:24, 6 August 2002 edit undoJacobgreenbaum (talk | contribs)471 edits POV text moved from subject pageNext edit → | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
| ''Beginning of the partizan text'' | ''Beginning of the partizan text'' | ||
| It has sometimes been argued by supporters of the Palestinian cause, for example, Archbishop ] in - that the state of ] is guilty of this crime, with regard to its treatment of the Palestinians on areas captured during the ]. In particular, they have been accused of breaching paragraphs (a)(iii), (c), (d) and (f) of Article II. | It has sometimes been argued by supporters of the Palestinian cause, for example, Archbishop ] in - that the state of ] is guilty of this crime, with regard to its treatment of the Palestinians on areas captured during the ]. In particular, they have been accused of breaching paragraphs (a)(iii), (c), (d) and (f) of Article II. | ||
| ---- | |||
| : The text below is not, by any stretch of the imagination, NPOV. It is opinion, and unsourced/unreferenced opinion at that. If there are those who have a contrary opinion then kindly reference them. For example, if "most governments world-wide" disagree then finding quotes from half a dozen governments shouldn't be too hard, should it? The second paragraphi is pure commentary - which, again, needs to be referenced and attributed. | |||
| ::Most governments world-wide would not support this view, due to their declared stance that the West Bank and Gaza constitute territories under military occupation, meaning their status of civilians inside them is by definition different from that of the Israeli citizens. | |||
| ::The limitations Israel imposed upon the Palestinians are not shared by Israeli Arabs; supporters of Israel therefore claim that the Israeli policies are caused solely by political and military reasons, pending the institution of an ] or state-like entity. | |||
| ---- | |||
Revision as of 14:24, 6 August 2002
Can anybody write something here on the beginnings and ending of apartheid in South Africa? Thanks.
I know the term originated in South Africa, but recently:
- apartheid was made a "human rights" violation, even for something as minor as not letting people organize a labor union
- a new supranational count (the ICC) claims jurisdiction to prosecute human rights violations everywhere in the world, even countries which did not ratify the ICC treaty
- my POV is that there's a trick here: the ICC/apartheid thing will be used selectively against Israel
A "trick"? Are Israel guilty of apartheid or aren't they? If they are, shouldn't they be made to stop doing it? GrahamN
If there is large enough group of people (e.g., Arabs in general or a specific Arab group or leader) who thinks Israel is guilty of apartheid, please mention this in the article. Suppose, for example that Mustapha Muhammed (to pick a name out of thin air) believes that Israel discriminates against Palestinians by not letting them form labor unions. Simply add that to the article. I would say something like:
- The UN definition of "apartheid" includes preventing an ethnic group from forming a labor union. Mustapha Muhammad, deputy commissinor of labor for the Palestinian Authority says that Israel is preventing Arabs in the West Bank from forming labor unions. They abolished the Hamas Haberdashers and Rug-Weavers local 319 in Jenin this summer.
Okay? Ed Poor
Okay. I will do some research. In the mean time I will delete the reference to Israel. GrahamN
- I've put the Israel paragraph back in, citing Desmond Tutu's April 2002 speech and providing links to its text. This was immediately vandalised by pro-Israel propaganda:
- "It has sometimes been argued, by supporters of the Palestinian cause..."
- The limitations Israel imposed upon the Palestinians are not shared by Israeli Arabs; supporters of Israel, therefore, claim that the Israeli policies are caused solely by political and military reasons, pending the institution of an independent Palestinian state or state-like entity.
- I've deleted the above on the grounds that this article is about apartheid, not about presenting an Israeli POV. Jacob
- You bring a charge here against Israel (that is, a POV saying that Israel's policies are Apartheid). Please be so kind as to entertain a counter-argument, or delete the discussion entirely. --Uri
- Actually, the NPOV doesn't require "balance". It only requires that the contributor attribute the point of view to its actual author. So if some international organizations have redefined "genocide" or "apartheid" to include Israels actions in the so-called "occupied territories", we need only report which organizations advocate these definitions. Even though you and I know they are 100% wrong, we can't use the Misplaced Pages as a bully pulpit. --Ed Poor
- That's true, but I didn't delete (the reference to) Tutu's statement. I merely indicated the existence of 2 other views (one belonging to most countries world-wide and the other to Israel). Not mentioning them would also be wrong, since they are important to the discussion. --Uri
Beginning of the partizan text It has sometimes been argued by supporters of the Palestinian cause, for example, Archbishop Desmond Tutu in a speech in Capetown in April 2002 - that the state of Israel is guilty of this crime, with regard to its treatment of the Palestinians on areas captured during the Six-Day War. In particular, they have been accused of breaching paragraphs (a)(iii), (c), (d) and (f) of Article II.
- The text below is not, by any stretch of the imagination, NPOV. It is opinion, and unsourced/unreferenced opinion at that. If there are those who have a contrary opinion then kindly reference them. For example, if "most governments world-wide" disagree then finding quotes from half a dozen governments shouldn't be too hard, should it? The second paragraphi is pure commentary - which, again, needs to be referenced and attributed.
- Most governments world-wide would not support this view, due to their declared stance that the West Bank and Gaza constitute territories under military occupation, meaning their status of civilians inside them is by definition different from that of the Israeli citizens.
- The limitations Israel imposed upon the Palestinians are not shared by Israeli Arabs; supporters of Israel therefore claim that the Israeli policies are caused solely by political and military reasons, pending the institution of an independent Palestinian state or state-like entity.