Revision as of 23:34, 2 July 2007 editKoavf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,174,994 edits →NFL moves← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:11, 3 July 2007 edit undo149.166.137.102 (talk) →NFL movesNext edit → | ||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
'''Discussion''' Slyspace, I did not discuss before moving the articles; I simply moved them in accordance with similar examples (e.g. ], not ] or ].) If the main article is at "]" then I figured all such articles containing "NFL" in the title should be consistently moved with the main title's name. Exceptions include ], for instance, whose name is just that. As for the ] redirects, I sincerely apologize for the hassle. I personally looked at the "What links here" for every move, and fixed several hundred double redirects. I found several of the NFL draft redirects after the fact, when I accidentally looked at "What links here" for the article ] itself. Somehow, these did not show up after I initially moved them, and I am grateful for your assistance. I find it doubtful any of the other moves resulted in unfixed double redirects, but I appreciate your every effort to assist and dialogue. -]·]·]·] 22:44, 2 July 2007 (UTC) | '''Discussion''' Slyspace, I did not discuss before moving the articles; I simply moved them in accordance with similar examples (e.g. ], not ] or ].) If the main article is at "]" then I figured all such articles containing "NFL" in the title should be consistently moved with the main title's name. Exceptions include ], for instance, whose name is just that. As for the ] redirects, I sincerely apologize for the hassle. I personally looked at the "What links here" for every move, and fixed several hundred double redirects. I found several of the NFL draft redirects after the fact, when I accidentally looked at "What links here" for the article ] itself. Somehow, these did not show up after I initially moved them, and I am grateful for your assistance. I find it doubtful any of the other moves resulted in unfixed double redirects, but I appreciate your every effort to assist and dialogue. -]·]·]·] 22:44, 2 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
:'''Round two''' I just looked at "What links here" for ] again and I didn't see any redirects. Again, let me know if there is anything screwy. -]·]·]·] 23:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC) | :'''Round two''' I just looked at "What links here" for ] again and I didn't see any redirects. Again, let me know if there is anything screwy. -]·]·]·] 23:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
::'''What links here, etc.''' Too true, but the double redirects should show up in the "What links here" pages. You are correct that it is better to check for any redirects to the old page, and that is precisely what the MediaWiki software started doing yesterday; the day before, it actually didn't provide any links, and I had to go to the actual page and proceed to "What links here" from the article itself. Consequently, this should not be an issue in the future, but, as always, thanks for your heads-up. ] 18:11, 3 July 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:11, 3 July 2007
NFL Draft
I'm currently working on NFL Draft table cleanup
Eric Laakso
Thank you for expanding the article. I started it because I believe he was an important part of the Dolphins' two Super Bowls teams of the 80's.Gypaetus 18:23, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Hiatus Road
thank you so much for rewriting hiatus road I really appreciate it. --Death Star III 00:57, 21 February 2007 (UTC)Death Star III
- Hiatus Road is an article I spent much time on. Being familiar with the route I personally find it a notable road and only edited the article as I saw a request for expansion. Please feel free to expand the article once assesed as start class needing a map and vote on the AfD. There are no hard feelings either way, it's always good practice to Edit an article. 22:07, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Ruth Pointer
Hi there! I think you accidentally restated vandalism when you made your second revert on this article. I removed the offensive statement, and I think the article is vandalism-free now. Keep up the vandal fighting!--Xnuala (talk) 01:56, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up and kudo's
Flood
Oops, it seems that in our haste to revert vandalism, we ended up reverting each other. RogueNinjatalk 00:05, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, the revert seems to have stuck. I listed the IP on AIV RogueNinjatalk 00:09, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Gold box
Hi their. We discussed this in Talk:2006 NFL Draft. Yes your right, we must add the box in the buttom for all the other years as well. Will try to work more on them Chaldean 03:42, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
- Great! Long live the great game on earth :D Chaldean 00:47, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Wikilinks in NFL Drafts
I see that you have wikilinked college and position names every time they appear in the NFL Drafts like the following see here. You should only link the first instance the college, team or position names appears. Thank You. •Gman124 18:11, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- I had nominated 2001 NFL Draft for featured list, and other editors made me change the draft, so that the team, college, and position names only link once before they voted for support. So I just assumed that we were supposed to link the first instance only, but I'm not really sure. Gman124 10:49, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- I've asked about what should be done with all those Draft pages at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject National Football League. Gman124 02:05, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Well I suppose this is another fine mess I've created that I'll have to clean up....Slysplace | 21:29, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- fixed tables from 1939-1948 and i see that you already fixed the other tables, and thanks. I'll also fix the tables that haven't been fixed yet, and I'm going to make all the pages have sortable tables since all the featured lists have sortable tablesGman124 00:21, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
- I have finished making all tables sortable, Gman124 02:23, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
- I didn't do anything to the HOF or the notable undrafted players, I just fixed the tables. I'll fix the links at HOF & Noteable players too then. And on the afl/nfl drafts i only made the tables sortable. Gman124 01:32, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- I have finished making all tables sortable, Gman124 02:23, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
- fixed tables from 1939-1948 and i see that you already fixed the other tables, and thanks. I'll also fix the tables that haven't been fixed yet, and I'm going to make all the pages have sortable tables since all the featured lists have sortable tablesGman124 00:21, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
- Well I suppose this is another fine mess I've created that I'll have to clean up....Slysplace | 21:29, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- I've asked about what should be done with all those Draft pages at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject National Football League. Gman124 02:05, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
NFL moves
Discussion Slyspace, I did not discuss before moving the articles; I simply moved them in accordance with similar examples (e.g. United Nations Security Council, not UN Security Council or UNSC.) If the main article is at "National Football League" then I figured all such articles containing "NFL" in the title should be consistently moved with the main title's name. Exceptions include NFL Blitz, for instance, whose name is just that. As for the NFL draft redirects, I sincerely apologize for the hassle. I personally looked at the "What links here" for every move, and fixed several hundred double redirects. I found several of the NFL draft redirects after the fact, when I accidentally looked at "What links here" for the article NFL Draft itself. Somehow, these did not show up after I initially moved them, and I am grateful for your assistance. I find it doubtful any of the other moves resulted in unfixed double redirects, but I appreciate your every effort to assist and dialogue. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 22:44, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Round two I just looked at "What links here" for NFL Draft again and I didn't see any redirects. Again, let me know if there is anything screwy. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 23:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- What links here, etc. Too true, but the double redirects should show up in the "What links here" pages. You are correct that it is better to check for any redirects to the old page, and that is precisely what the MediaWiki software started doing yesterday; the day before, it actually didn't provide any links, and I had to go to the actual page and proceed to "What links here" from the article itself. Consequently, this should not be an issue in the future, but, as always, thanks for your heads-up. 149.166.137.102 18:11, 3 July 2007 (UTC)