Revision as of 13:59, 8 July 2007 editSa.vakilian (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers14,646 edits Muslim military history← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:01, 8 July 2007 edit undoSa.vakilian (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers14,646 edits →Muslim military history: Iranian military historyNext edit → | ||
Line 399: | Line 399: | ||
Salam. There are some watchlists in the ]. Can you please pay attention to them to prevent vandalism, 3rr and other WP sins. Thanks a lot.--<font face="monospace">](]-])</font> 06:27, 8 July 2007 (UTC) | Salam. There are some watchlists in the ]. Can you please pay attention to them to prevent vandalism, 3rr and other WP sins. Thanks a lot.--<font face="monospace">](]-])</font> 06:27, 8 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
== Muslim military history == | == Muslim military history & Iranian military history == | ||
Salam. Can we made a new task force in ] which includes ], ] and ] . --<font face="monospace">](]-])</font> 13:59, 8 July 2007 (UTC) | Salam. Can we made a new task force in ] which includes ], ] and ] . --<font face="monospace">](]-])</font> 13:59, 8 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
:What about Iranian military history--<font face="monospace">](]-])</font> 14:01, 8 July 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:01, 8 July 2007
FayssalF's talk page | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It's not an . It's a joke!
Governorates of EgyptSalut FayssalF! I have a problem with User:Rarelibra concerning the page Governorates of Egypt. I know you have excellent conflict resolution skills, so you may be able to help with that, if you have time of course. Alf shokr et mille merci en avance :) --Lanternix 16:31, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks guys for your understandings. I should also tahnk you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. Happy editing. -- FayssalF - 05:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC) Non-free use disputed for Image:Salifkeita.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Salifkeita.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:38, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Non-free use disputed for Image:Mandc.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Mandc.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:32, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Non-free use disputed for Image:Lequipelogo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Lequipelogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
BlockCan you block the vandal that made this page? Prester John 04:28, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Non-free use disputed for Image:SHGb02-14a.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:SHGb02-14a.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:57, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Deir Yassin massacreHi Fayssal!! Are you as an admin empowered to unprotect the above? It needs wikifying - and other work too. Important article. Cheers. Itsmejudith 10:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
RfCYes, I noticed it. I guess that his clarifications regarding the issue was what was needed, and that this should solve the dispute and settle the matter. -- Karl Meier 17:55, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Requesting block for Kirbytime's sockpuppetI was going to post it to ANI but then I thought it would be nice if you could make this block. Checkuser for Kirbytime (talk · contribs · block log) has confirmed that 0rrAvenger (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) is a sock puppet of Kirbytime, who as you know was blocked indef on May 15 for trolling. thanks, --Matt57 03:00, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
re William WallaceStarThank you. I honestly do not understand what message, if any, that this figure might be attempting to convey, but I thank you for the thought... ;~) LessHeard vanU 19:50, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your unbiased viewI knew when you put your neck out and made the controversal decision in the ANI, that by following the wiki process, your position will be vindicated. See here for the next stage in the process. Thank you very much. Taprobanus 15:59, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
M.V.E.i.Please note that I asked not to make a rushed decision, and to allow time for consensus to build. The twenty minutes you waited before announcing you were going to unblock in 15 minutes is not what I was thinking. Please allow a little more time, I want to see a consensus to reduce the length of the block, not you and Nick. As the user will remain blocked either way, waiting a few hours will make no difference. Neil ╦ 17:37, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Reply.Thank you for notifying me that the administrators were confused about my multiple accounts, and a misunderstanding that I am impersonating User: Odst. I left a message of explanation on the page that you told me to post on. So, again, thank you very much. (But, why did you move my two wikiproject template on the top of my talk page? Even though you might have thought that they were all for articles, one of them, the French wp one, was for the user. I am not trying to be mean, but, please do not change things on my user/talk page. The reason why I changed some things on Odst's page was because I got a permission from him. If you do not believe me, then you may ask me for proof).
Fayssal my friend ,A group of IP addresses have taken a special interest at my user page. They all love to vandal my user page with nonsense. I have waited believing this non sense will come to end soon, but it seems it wont. Fayssal, could you please do something regarding this matter. These IP's could either belong to a University or to a group of proxies. And I have that noticed some of are even black listed.Your help is appreciated here. Thanks in advance.Iwazaki 14:54, 9 June 2007 (UTC) Your comment on my talk page defending an editor who fraudulently used name of another personHere is what you wrote on my talk page: Please once you are back, do not post any comments about the person qualifications like you did here. He doesn't have to prove that to anyone and therefore you don't have to question them as it is considered harassment. Thanks you. -- FayssalF - 16:33, 8 June 2007 (UTC) I find it amazing that asking for degree verification is offensive. Please read this article by Jimbo Wales. I'm simply repeating Jimbo's concerns . Particularly in this case where editor Jrod2 is known to fraudulently use another person's name it is only natural that one may doubt credibility of any statement made by this editor specially any advanced degree programs. Only after he was exposed, he admitted to using a sock puppet and a name of living person. Furthermore lack of technical knowledge exhibited by this editor and extreme bias in editing articles makes me question his credentials even more . But if admins prefer to have another editor with fake credentials editing wikipedia then I have nothing more to say except that this will most likely lead to another scandal for wikipedia. And if you defend an editor who is using fake degrees then you are only complicit with this situation. --VinylJoe 23:46, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Tablighi_Jamaat#Allegations_of_Violence_and_Islamic_ExtremismDear FayssalF, The above section of the article has some exceptional claims which are not cited. Some editors insist that the section stays though non of the claims there have been proved with reliable sources. The contents of the section to me looks more like mere speculation. Could you please look into this matter. thanks in advance NëŧΜǒńğer 11:14, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Film listsHi Fayssal how are you these days?. Hey I'm getting there slowly on the lists - I can't solely concentrate on them but I work better if I do them gradually. See List of British films, List of Italian films List of Argentine films, List of Bollywood films for development and also I have just begun List of American films - the biggest task of them all. The naviagation box looks global now most of the lists created by me. The next task will be to add bulk them all out with all the missing films and then add the entirety of articles on films and actors!!!:
DébordéFayssal me parait débordé par bien des sujets sensibles en ce moment il à du prendre un peu de distance et de reposTostempscurios 17:10, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Tostempscurios 20:29, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
http://www.kuna.net.kw/NewsAgenciesPublicSite/ArticlePrintPage.aspx?id=1757558&language=en et demandons un don pour Misplaced Pages !Tostempscurios 21:18, 29 June 2007 (UTC) Fatimah ZahraSalam. Please pay attention to this article. It may be POV. Unfortunately I'm almost sure that a wikipedian thinks he is the owner of the article.. I put comments in his talk page but I don't have enough time to discuss with him. God bless you.--Sa.vakilian(t-c) 02:55, 18 June 2007 (UTC) InvitationWould like to join us on Arabic wikipedia . We have a lack of very important articles and of serious contributors and I think that your experience on wp:en can help us a lot to make wp:ar better . Sorry for my English and if you can pass this message to any interested contributors i would be very grateful .ar:user:Omar86 InvitationWould like to know whether you care to comment on here as to whether the source Tamilnet violates WP:NPOV and WP:UNDUE. Thanks Taprobanus 17:16, 18 June 2007 (UTC) Omar HayssamGreetings. I've asked Anas Salloum for his opinion on this article; he said you could also provide one. May I ask, then: how do you see the issue? Thanks for your help. Biruitorul 22:49, 18 June 2007 (UTC) Unspecified source for Image:Khaldun.jpgThanks for uploading Image:Khaldun.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:51, 19 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 15:51, 19 June 2007 (UTC) Thanks for your note about admin coachingHi FayssalF,
Deleting a pageHi Faysal, u have crated a page "Shrug people" and got information from some people who said to "Know" something but according to sonme members and myself i would say Hoax, so i am asking you to delete it. thanbksBalu2000 11:04, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Faysal MateCan you help out on the Maghrebine pages and this bizarre edit war set off by Mariam83? As I noted in comments, I don't even necessarily disagree with some (even a good many) of her edits, but the wholesale vandalistic editing with refusal to discuss at all is bloody stunning. Also rather disturbing is the editing on the African connexion angle, mate, as well as her comments on pages re 3bid, quite racialistic. Best collounsbury 14:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC).
MilitaryHi Fayssal. Okay, I'll have a little think ... ← Roger → 15:16, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Yes I have Created it im so sorry, is it any possible for you to delete it? thanksBalu2000 19:04, 20 June 2007 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image (Image:SHGb02-14a.jpg)Thanks for uploading Image:SHGb02-14a.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:41, 21 June 2007 (UTC) advice about task forceHi FayssalF, Thank you for the excellent advice about admin culture. I have duly watchlisted WP:ANI, WP:RFPP, WP:AFD, and WP:AIV; I look forward to learning enough about these processes to participate in them actively. I am writing you today because you are a member of Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Politics. I have an idea for a task force which I began working on yesterday. Here is the page where I have been organizing my thoughts: Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Politics/money and politics task force. To my chagrin, I have just learned that I probably should have gathered consensus from WP:PJ Politics members before starting a page. My question for you is, how should I proceed with my idea for the task force? I am confident that members of the Politics project would support it, provided that I sought that support tactfully. Thank you again for your help, Cyrusc 02:32, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Assistance / Advice on the Mariam83 personMate, I really don't know what the best approach here is. As Admin perhaps you can direct me to the proper channels. Aside from inundating my formerly peaceful talk pages, she/he/it is going back to the same hectoring editing her/his/its peculiar views are the facts etc. as before. I can either give up, or .... what? Don't particularly want my entire talk page being filled with this. collounsbury 18:27, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Arabic numeralsHello Fayssalf In this page Wikimediaand elsewhere, User try to impose that the Arab numerals are Indian figures without any clear obviousness or only one manuscript, each stating only. All that I request is that all the voices are heard.--Manssour 09:26, 24 June 2007 (UTC) MaghrebI think it is time you unlocked the Maghreb page, as it contains some false information that needs to be removed/edited. You are also in dire need of a history lesson. I urge you to learn more about the region from which you come. As far as I know, Morocco is not part of the United Nations of the African Jungle, and Maghreb explicitly means, nations bordering the Mediterranean or Red Sea. If as an admin the content does not interest you, then perhaps you should not lock pages at the request of contributors whose intent it is to distort content! Thank you Mariam83 16:52, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
adThis WP:MILHIST ad created by User:Miranda. :⇒ SWATJester 16:12, 25 June 2007 (UTC) Next StepIn the ANI, you suggested a way forward. I want to know exactly about what ? Is it about content dispute or source dispute that we should take to the next step? I have been following the wiki process about the RS status of Tamilnet. We talked about in ANI, took it to WP:RS talk page received neutral opinion then took it to number of talk pages, especially Sarathambal and Ilayathambi Tharsini pages as our test cases. One is protected for a month with way forward that noone has contested and another is just undergone major editing with invitation out for the "warriors" to participate. Looks like one has responded. In my opinion, only if these efforts fail should we take it to the next level ? Just my opinion. Thanks Taprobanus 19:58, 26 June 2007 (UTC) Request your advice about Angelo Victor MercureHi FayssalF, I was just granted adminship this morning. Thank you for serving as my admin coach and providing advice when I needed it. I hope I can still come to you from time to time when I need advice. I may need it more often in these first days as an admin as I learn how to make admin decisions. For instance, I am looking at a CSD for Angelo Victor Mercure which asserts that it is a copyvio. And it is... However, User:Angelomercure has asserted that the material is his and that he is the one uploading it. If we don't consider Misplaced Pages:Conflict of interest, we could just ask Angelo to slap the appropriate copyleft free license on the material and be done with it. However, on reviewing the material in the article, I'm not sure that Mr. Mercure is notable and thus I think the article qualifies under A7 instead of G12. Should I just go ahead and delete it, explaining my reasoning and leaving a note for Mr. Mercure on his Talk Page? Or, do you have a different suggestion? Thanx. --Richard 06:26, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Barnstar...Thank you very much for the barnstar Fayssal. Lysandros 13:02, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
RevertingYou didn't make an "argument" either. If you have no idea whether or not the categories should be included, then you should investigate, not revert. Jayjg 16:23, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Classification systemOK. I'll organize my thoughts and post them to explain myself. It will take a day or two, as it seems to be a rather complex situaion. Richiar 18:02, 29 June 2007 (UTC) RfA thanks
AishaHi Fayssal, If you could help in this dispute of mine with Arrow and Proab , I would be thankful (of course if you have time :) ). As usual, we have a source and it says something, but Arrow and Proab oppose adding the material to wikipedia. --Aminz 08:40, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
GreetingsI see you visited my talk page. Something about my patience. I'm not sure which article you're referring to, but thanks. Peace. :) deeceevoice 17:53, 30 June 2007 (UTC) Your noteHi Crum. Hope you are doing great. Could you please guide me to a report about blocking indef the above user? -- FayssalF - 12:27, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
(outdent) I think you are missing the point, Fayssal. He is blocked indefinitely pending clarification. This means that his block can be reviewed and reduced at any time, if he demonstrates understanding, acceptance and compliance with the rules. As of now, he has never abided by any block - he keeps editing and ignoring the blocks. If we gave him a 2 week extension or a 2 year extension it wouldn't matter - he keeps editing the same general topics immediately with anon IPs, claiming we can't stop him. So the point is not block duration - it is the fact that he ignores and refuses to accept any block of any length. Crum375 14:57, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
My RfAThank you for participating in my RfA. It was successful, and I am now, may God have mercy on us all, an administrator. Look at all the new buttons! I had heard about 'protect,' 'block user,' and 'delete,' but no one told me about 'kill,' 'eject,' and 'purée.' I appreciate the trust the community has in me, and I'll try hard not to delete the main page or block Jimbo. -FisherQueen (Talk) 18:24, 2 July 2007 (UTC) My recent RfBThank you so much for your participation in my recent RfB. Though it closed with 72% support (below the required 90%), I'm still quite pleased at the outpouring of support shown by a fair percentage of the community. I'm currently tabulating and calculating all opposing and neutral arguments to help me better address the community's concerns about my abilities as a bureaucrat. If you'd like, you can follow my progress (and/or provide additional suggestions) at User:EVula/admin/RfB notes. Thanks again! However, I'll have to pass on the Senator bit; I'm quite content with just being an admin and 'crat. ;) EVula // talk // ☯ // 04:40, 3 July 2007 (UTC) RktectHi Fayssal, There is a fuller discussion here, though it got somewhat buried under God. Tewfik 18:16, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Human rights of Kurdish people in TurkeyHi Fayssal, There's currently a rv war going on here about the inclusion of content suggesting a genocide of Kurds in Turkey. I've been arguing it's undue weight and does not deserve a place in the article, i'd appreciate some fresh input. Thanks, --A.Garnet 11:12, 4 July 2007 (UTC) Hi Fayssal, Nikosilver keep making exact same edits over and over again.. He changed your version again to his POV pushing one..Can you check the article again please..--laertes d 21:07, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Need help.Salam friend , i've been discussing some facts on Battle of Khafji , and it seems to me that someone trying to Americanize the event by removing sourced information , and according his other addition to un-related materials , he have reached the 3RR also i think , and you as an adminstrator and friend i request you to take a look to the recent changes. thanks . Ammar ( - ) 16:31, 4 July 2007 (UTC) User:Wassermannmay i know the reason why did you blocked this user? thanks, Sushant gupta (talk · contribs) 10:03, 7 July 2007 (UTC) WatchlistsSalam. There are some watchlists in the Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Islam#Task forces. Can you please pay attention to them to prevent vandalism, 3rr and other WP sins. Thanks a lot.--Sa.vakilian(t-c) 06:27, 8 July 2007 (UTC) Muslim military history & Iranian military historySalam. Can we made a new task force in Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Military history which includes Ghazwat, Muslim conquests and Civil Wars of the Early Caliphates . --Sa.vakilian(t-c) 13:59, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
|