| Revision as of 14:00, 8 July 2007 editZeq (talk | contribs)10,670 edits Can you guess ?← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:27, 8 July 2007 edit undoEep² (talk | contribs)7,014 editsm fixed z-index of bluegirl so it's behind links--moved left more like it was before, tooNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div style="position: absolute; top: 1500px; right: 600px; z-index: 2">]</div> | <div style="position: absolute; top: 1500px; right: 600px; z-index: 2">]</div> | ||
| <div style="position: absolute; top: 50px; right: 100px; z-index: 2">]</div> | <div style="position: absolute; top: 50px; right: 100px; z-index: 2">]</div> | ||
| <div style="position: absolute; top: 5px; left: |
<div style="position: absolute; top: 5px; left: 25px; z-index:0">]</div> | ||
| </div> | </div> | ||
| <inputbox> | <inputbox> | ||
Revision as of 17:27, 8 July 2007
File:Animalibrí.gif
 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Israeli-Palestinian conflictMain page: Talk:Israeli-Palestinian_conflict § UnprotectionUser:Suicup is trying to push some of his/her own POV on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict page by claiming that "Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem are a key obstacle to a peaceful resolution of the conflict" (emphasis added). All fair-minded Misplaced Pages editors with a working knowledge of WP:NPOV have agreed that a more neutral word (such as "a factor" rather than "a key obstacle") would be more appropriate. Suicup claims to be unbiased in this matter, and yet in the debate, he/she accused those that challenged him to be "a clique of pro-Israeli contributors," implying that (1) Suicup is anti-Israel and therefore the lone voice of reason and (2) that there is a Jewish conspiracy on Misplaced Pages. Any help in this matter would be appreciated. Thanks. --GHcool 06:08, 7 July 2007 (UTC) Thanks, SV. :) --GHcool 22:34, 7 July 2007 (UTC) WP:V opinion requestHi there, do you have an opinion on which of these formulations of a paragraph in this policy is preferable? Tim Vickers 16:30, 7 July 2007 (UTC) User:XotheusedguyoxNow his ban is over, he is again going against established consensus, and will probably break the 3RR again wihtout blinking. Any suggestions for further action? --Jamdav86 17:08, 7 July 2007 (UTC) the used templetethe user who got me banned, is making the templete the way way they only like it, they r missing two singles and have the memebrs listed wrong they are the ones that need to be ban, so u shud unprotect the page so i can fix it proper and ban them cause they are deleting true information that has been listed there 4 a while and they didnt ask if it was ok to change on the discussion page (now it looks like the previous member are still in the band, and they delted two digital singles so unprotect the page so i can fix it please) ...i dont think that person is going to go on the discussion page unless its changed backed so it would be best to unprotect it cause the way i make it, is the way its been for a long time and they are the only one who had a problem with it and tried to change it back so it obvious that they are the problem here Xotheusedguyox 00:09, 8 July 2007 (UTC) Hi just to let you know that I have sent you an email and was hoping that you have got it ok and could possibly have a look at it? thank you Can you guess ?Who "she" is: Zeq 14:00, 8 July 2007 (UTC) |
