| Revision as of 14:45, 9 July 2007 editGeologyguy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers13,298 edits Geologic Column← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:01, 9 July 2007 edit undoKevmin (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers48,023 editsm →Geologic Column: commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| I wish that you had discussed the changes you have made/are making to many page - the previous link, to ] was a far more informative one. The new page ] contains extraneous names and lacks the detail present in the former one. ] 14:45, 9 July 2007 (UTC) | I wish that you had discussed the changes you have made/are making to many page - the previous link, to ] was a far more informative one. The new page ] contains extraneous names and lacks the detail present in the former one. ] 14:45, 9 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :I agree with ] the links that were changed lead to more appropriate pages then the ] page. ] seems to be a recreation of the ] page under a name translated from a different language and should probobly be made into a redirect.--] 15:01, 9 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:01, 9 July 2007
Geologic Column
I wish that you had discussed the changes you have made/are making to many page - the previous link, to Geologic time scale was a far more informative one. The new page Geologic column contains extraneous names and lacks the detail present in the former one. Geologyguy 14:45, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with Geologyguy the links that were changed lead to more appropriate pages then the Geologic column page. Geologic column seems to be a recreation of the Geologic time scale page under a name translated from a different language and should probobly be made into a redirect.--Kevmin 15:01, 9 July 2007 (UTC)