Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
Keeping editsunder12,000, I have worked on over 4,200 WP articles, hundreds anonymously, including:
Keeping revisions below 16,000 extensive edits, I have worked on over 5,900 WP articles, hundreds anonymously, including:
{{Col-begin}}
{{Col-begin}}
{{Col-1-of-2}}
{{Col-1-of-2}}
*] Years ]-] (illustrations)
*] Years ]-] (illustrations)
*] Years ] - ]
*] Years ] - ]
*] ]
*] ]
Line 109:
Line 109:
* Collaboration is facilitated by having titled sub-sections for each person to edit.
* Collaboration is facilitated by having titled sub-sections for each person to edit.
* Edit-summary lines can be long: 4 or 5 different changes can be described (if abbreviated) as just 1 edit-summary save.
* Edit-summary lines can be long: 4 or 5 different changes can be described (if abbreviated) as just 1 edit-summary save.
* Copy (ctrl-C) the edit buffer before Preview/Save in case a send error loses the edit data.
* Check revision-history to seeif revisions are frequent, or make changes during slow periods of article activity.
* Check revision-history to avoid when revisions are frequent, or make changes during slow periods of article activity.
* Avoid busy articles: anticipate changes being reverted depending on peer comprehension, and consider updates to other thousands of quiet, but significant articles, instead.
* Avoid busy articles: anticipate changes being reverted depending on peer comprehension, and consider updates to other thousands of quiet, but significant articles, instead.
* Avoid one-word changes: when fixing a spelling error, also add text or source footnotes; make each revision more significant.
* Avoid one-word changes: when fixing a spelling error, also add text or source footnotes; make each revision more significant.
Wiki collaborations are often wide-open territory, ruled by groups. There is little protection of an individual, except in a Wikiproject or such. Diversity is not sought, since "concensus" ranks higher than "correctness" and power is controlled by groups. If you want civility, join or form a group: else, the law of the Old West applies, so don't get stabbed in the back.
I would have made over 100,000 edits, but I learned (after months) to edit offline, then check an article's revision history to merge multiple edits using just one SAVE operation. Tips:
Copying the edit buffer to a text editor allows search-and-replace.
Collaboration is facilitated by having titled sub-sections for each person to edit.
Edit-summary lines can be long: 4 or 5 different changes can be described (if abbreviated) as just 1 edit-summary save.
Copy (ctrl-C) the edit buffer before Preview/Save in case a send error loses the edit data.
Check revision-history to avoid when revisions are frequent, or make changes during slow periods of article activity.
Avoid busy articles: anticipate changes being reverted depending on peer comprehension, and consider updates to other thousands of quiet, but significant articles, instead.
Avoid one-word changes: when fixing a spelling error, also add text or source footnotes; make each revision more significant.
An edit-page window can be updated between sessions by login via a 2nd window, then previewing differences to merge intermittent changes as just one save.
Double-checking of modifications can avoid creating another 20,000 edits, by waiting and combining updates as one save operation. Remember: Many planned changes can be postponed until other changes are ready; tolerance for vandalism has provided tolerance for "late" changes to be batched together.
Images edited
I have created and uploaded hundreds of images, many to Wikimedia Commons.
The Misplaced Pages project has struggled for years, but, like the initial years of the Internet, the information is maturing. Rampant vandalism is being fought by protected articles & anti-vandal bots.
I have added many articles, mostly on historic subjects.
The search for knowledge is a fool's errand. The most valuable knowledge I have learned is to be polite and forgiving with other people (although WP can be an extreme test of patience!).
(The name "Wikid77" is a contraction for "Wiki id77" as a user name.)
Wiki opinions continued
The Misplaced Pages collaboration is a vast organization that allows, not only writing in encyclopedia articles, but also copy-edit revisions of articles, writing reviews of articles, and judging deletion/cleanup of various articles and templates, etc.
There are many groups of cooperating users, some organized as Wikiprojects, and some acting as "inter-wikicity gangs" with limited civility (speaking euphemistically); however, the Misplaced Pages universe is vast enough to just ignore some groups and focus on wide-open areas of frontier articles. In 2007, there still remain thousands of articles that can be revised/expanded without clashing with groups of a particular mindset.
For people who are good at writing but strongly dislike the idea of their articles being hacked within 2 months, the process of review writing might be a better avenue, since reviews are based on personal written remarks, not subject to such rehashed writing. However, even in articles, original authors are free to correct added text for grammar errors and awkward word-flow, which often gets introduced within a few months of the original writing.
Large areas of Wikis are run by mobocracy voting. Numerous edit wars and conflicts exist in some highly popular groups of articles, especially in recent events or news articles. In those conflicts, typically 99% of debates are decided by mob rule, not mediated reason. Some article cuts are extreme, such as the deletion of the statement that the Virginia Tech shooter was "suspected of prior bomb threats and had been under investigation" for months: that statement was immediately censored as "clever vandalism" (only to be justified days later by news that school officials had referred him to psychiatric counseling).
As in any psychological conflict, it is better to avoid conflicts involving people or groups with severe mindsets: it is difficult to know who is "gunnysacking" resentment against another person. Just walk away into another open frontier of the Wiki universe, until policies are developed to restrict such difficult people. Troubled people might seem to be living in an unreal world, but they could be discovering real residential or workplace addresses.