| Revision as of 02:13, 15 July 2007 view sourceSteven Walling (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators49,757 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:15, 15 July 2007 view source Steven Walling (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators49,757 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| Don't mistake mme for an Encyclopedia Dramatica troll making a WP:POINT nomination; as my talk page comment proves, I believe ED is an annoying site that raids other sites. The reason I am making this nomination is to save WP from the evils of ].] 02:09, 15 July 2007 (UTC) | Don't mistake mme for an Encyclopedia Dramatica troll making a WP:POINT nomination; as my talk page comment proves, I believe ED is an annoying site that raids other sites. The reason I am making this nomination is to save WP from the evils of ].] 02:09, 15 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Speedy Keep''' First off, there has been three other strong majority consensus' for keeping this article is the previous AFDs, for good reason. The article obviously meets ] with verification of significant coverage in 41 reliable, independent sources. This site has been covered in news articles all over the U.S. and the world, including the New York Times. Furthermore, ] and "we should attack it |
*'''Speedy Keep''' First off, there has been three other strong majority consensus' for keeping this article is the previous AFDs, for good reason. The article obviously meets ] with verification of significant coverage in 41 reliable, independent sources. This site has been covered in news articles all over the U.S. and the world, including the New York Times. Furthermore, ] and "we should attack it" are not valid arguments for deletion. Misplaced Pages carries a ], and doesn't make value judgments of any kind. Being an attack site is not a valid argument for deletion. ] <sup>]</sup> 02:13, 15 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:15, 15 July 2007
Conservapedia
We need an actual consensus on this. We can't give these fools so much attention. They are evil people who want only to troll and attack Misplaced Pages's users. They even reveal personal information about their vandals and report them to the FBI, which never works, since the FBI have better things to do than deal with this. We should help attack this piece of crap asmuch as possible, and hoepfully remove all rferences and links to the site, including this article. I propose we even blacklist the name "conservapedia", in order that this crap not get a high google ranking.
Don't mistake mme for an Encyclopedia Dramatica troll making a WP:POINT nomination; as my talk page comment proves, I believe ED is an annoying site that raids other sites. The reason I am making this nomination is to save WP from the evils of the most piece of trash I have ever seen.Nathaniel B. Heraniaos 02:09, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep First off, there has been three other strong majority consensus' for keeping this article is the previous AFDs, for good reason. The article obviously meets WP:Notability with verification of significant coverage in 41 reliable, independent sources. This site has been covered in news articles all over the U.S. and the world, including the New York Times. Furthermore, I don't like it and "we should attack it" are not valid arguments for deletion. Misplaced Pages carries a neutral point of view, and doesn't make value judgments of any kind. Being an attack site is not a valid argument for deletion. VanTucky 02:13, 15 July 2007 (UTC)