| Revision as of 15:14, 30 May 2005 editStr1977 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers59,123 editsNo edit summary | Revision as of 12:19, 31 May 2005 edit undoFiamekeeper (talk | contribs)69 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| No, leading military figures invented the "dagger thrust legend" immediately after the war, when they were questioned on the responsibility for the defeat. No need for partisan attacks, of which I never heard of. | No, leading military figures invented the "dagger thrust legend" immediately after the war, when they were questioned on the responsibility for the defeat. No need for partisan attacks, of which I never heard of. | ||
| ] 15:14, 30 May 2005 (UTC) | ] 15:14, 30 May 2005 (UTC) | ||
| ==Mowrer's Views== | |||
| These are Mowrer views ,minimally trans-iterated to avoid copyright . I put up this article to avoid nation based, political and faith-based POV /NPOV which was sullying the wikiP . I do not intend here to have to defend these views of Mowrer's and fight for every inch . why don't you get real and actually face the questions , face that book Kenny alluded to, add helpful rather than hindering comment on pages. I note you are still carrying on your efforts to minimise all this scandal and to prevent any advance . Which is of itself interesting . | |||
| If you wish to censor history I think you succeed quite well, but Mowrer's views are his own , and are as I say ] . it makes it difficult that you say you are nott a specialist or knowledgeable about the Concordat events , but that does not stop you from wielding your mental axe . Would'nt it be wonderful to have you on the other side , what is still called the '''side of the angels''' . ....] 12:19, 31 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:19, 31 May 2005
What are these sentences supposed to mean?
"The German people however knew that Russia had been subject to German invasion after her defeat whereas in 1918 German soldiery were everywhere placed on foreign soil when its commanders petitioned for peace."
"Germany was prey to continuous partisan and political Insurrection as well as pressure from Belgium and France."
"A new army and the Radical Right combined and fought against Poles, Communists and Left Socialists and against the self-same new Weimar Republic."
The following is incorrect:
"In result the unrepentant nationalists created the legend that an undefeated Germany had been felled by a revolutionary dagger thrust at home."
No, leading military figures invented the "dagger thrust legend" immediately after the war, when they were questioned on the responsibility for the defeat. No need for partisan attacks, of which I never heard of. Str1977 15:14, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
Mowrer's Views
These are Mowrer views ,minimally trans-iterated to avoid copyright . I put up this article to avoid nation based, political and faith-based POV /NPOV which was sullying the wikiP . I do not intend here to have to defend these views of Mowrer's and fight for every inch . why don't you get real and actually face the questions , face that book Kenny alluded to, add helpful rather than hindering comment on pages. I note you are still carrying on your efforts to minimise all this scandal and to prevent any advance . Which is of itself interesting .
If you wish to censor history I think you succeed quite well, but Mowrer's views are his own , and are as I say Witness POV . it makes it difficult that you say you are nott a specialist or knowledgeable about the Concordat events , but that does not stop you from wielding your mental axe . Would'nt it be wonderful to have you on the other side , what is still called the side of the angels . ....Fiamekeeper 12:19, 31 May 2005 (UTC)