| Revision as of 02:00, 18 July 2007 editFather Goose (talk | contribs)Administrators10,523 edits The "old version" is fine, but I added the two proposals in a "see also" section. The proposals have been advertised as appearing on this page. I won't oppose a revert, though.← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:16, 18 July 2007 edit undoEdgarde (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers19,109 edits rv. These should not get a "See also", which is a recommendation. Removing entirely because various drafts (and various sub-essays now propagating) should be discussed on Talk page, not appended here.Next edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| At times just because information is true and citable does not necessarily mean it meets the threshold for notability within a given article. | At times just because information is true and citable does not necessarily mean it meets the threshold for notability within a given article. | ||
| See also other ''notability'' related topics in the list on the right. | |||
| == See also == | |||
| Two independent proposals being developed for ]: | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| ] | ] | ||
Revision as of 02:16, 18 July 2007
| Notability |
|---|
| General notability guideline |
| Subject-specific guidelines |
| See also |
Relevance in Misplaced Pages is the umbrella term for:
- being important, see Misplaced Pages:Importance
- being interesting, see Misplaced Pages:Trivia
That importance and being interesting are treated as separate characteristics of Misplaced Pages articles follows from the NPOV tutorial, which states that Misplaced Pages topics need to be important and also interesting.
At times just because information is true and citable does not necessarily mean it meets the threshold for notability within a given article.
See also other notability related topics in the list on the right.