Suicide of Vince Foster: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 11:47, 25 July 2007 editWasted Time R (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers74,027 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:12, 25 July 2007 edit undoSmackBot (talk \| contribs)3,734,324 edits Date/fix the maintenance tags or gen fixesNext edit →
Line 48:		Line 48:

	===FOIA request===		===FOIA request===
	In an extremely unusual move, however, in November 1994, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia circuit, in response to a request by the Wall Street Journal, under the Freedom of Information Act for the final Fiske Report, issued a ] that prevented the Journal from publishing a story about its response to the request. Presumably, the court denied the request, but it also sealed its own response.{{~~citeneeded~~}}		In an extremely unusual move, however, in November 1994, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia circuit, in response to a request by the Wall Street Journal, under the Freedom of Information Act for the final Fiske Report, issued a ] that prevented the Journal from publishing a story about its response to the request. Presumably, the court denied the request, but it also sealed its own response.{{Fact\|date=July 2007}}

	==See also==		==See also==

Revision as of 21:12, 25 July 2007

Deputy White House counsel Vince Foster was found dead in Fort Marcy Park off the George Washington Parkway in Virginia, outside Washington, D.C., on July 20, 1993. His death was officially ruled a suicide, but others have objected to this conclusion.

Official findings

Foster's death was ruled a suicide by investigations conducted by

After an exhaustive three-year investigation, Starr reaffirmed that Foster's death was a suicide. As CNN explained on February 28, 1997, "The report refutes claims by conservative political organizations that Foster was the victim of a murder plot and coverup," but "despite those findings, right-wing political groups have continued to allege that there was more to the death and that the president and first lady tried to cover it up."

Conspiracy theories

Background

Some observers have questioned the reports of suicide. One such group is Accuracy in Media (AIM). AIM quotes Assistant U.S. Attorney Miguel Rodriguez, who resigned from the investigation, as saying "I knew what the result was going to be, because I was told what the result was going to be from the get-go."

Some propose that Foster was murdered to prevent his revealing information derogatory to Clinton, about Whitewater, Travelgate, or other matters, or that Hillary Clinton was somehow involved by covering up activities together with Foster before his death. Others allege a romantic relationship between Foster and Hillary Clinton. Other critics of the Clintons have made even more lurid allegations, clamining that she had killed Foster herself or had him killed. No credible evidence or charges were ever brought forward in connection with any of these allegations.

The Washington Post noted David Brock was "summoned" to a meeting with Rex Armistead in Miami, Florida at an airport hotel. Armistead laid out an elaborate "Vince Foster murder scenario," Brock said – a scenario that he found implausible." Both Brock and Armistead were reporters who were funded by Richard Scaife to investigate issues ranging from drug smuggling to Foster to discredit Clinton with the Arkansas Project.

Scaife funded Christopher W. Ruddy (later founder of NewsMax), who previously was a writer for the Scaife-owned Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, to research Clinton for the Arkansas Project. Ruddy has argued that while he posits no conspiracy theory about Foster's death, he believes a cover-up took place and that Foster's body had likely been moved.

Ruddy was backed by Joseph Farah and Farah's organization the Western Journalism Center. This group supplied Ruddy with "additional expense money, funding for Freedom of Information Act requests, legal support and publicity during his book research of a conspiracy surrounding the suicide of Foster. Ruddy eventually released The Strange Death of Vincent Foster which was published by Simon & Schuster.

Nonetheless, in 1999 Farah's Western Journalism Center "placed some 50 ads reprinting Ruddy's Tribune-Review stories in the Washington Times, then repackaged the articles as a packet titled The Ruddy Investigation, which sold for $12." Shortly thereafter, the Western Journalism Center "circulated a video featuring Ruddy's claims, 'Unanswered-The Death of Vincent Foster,' that was produced by James Davidson, chairman of the National Taxpayers Union (NTU) and co-editor of the Strategic Investment newsletter." (NTU's research arm receives funds from Scaife.) Eventually, Scaife became an investor and the third-largest stockholder of Ruddy's NewsMax and both NewsMax and the WorldNetDaily continue to publish materials that show the Clintons in a negative light."

Besides the official investigations, including Kenneth Starr's report that ruled Foster's death a suicide, Dan Moldea wrote a book, with encouragement from Al Regnery of Regnery Publishing house stating that Foster's death was a suicide and he found the scenarios were first promulgated by Robert Hines who shared ideas with Reed Irvine at Accuracy in Media, and Christopher W. Ruddy, who was then at the New York Post. Hines had falsely told "them that there is no exit wound in Foster's head," but Moldea explained, "I don't think there was anything nefarious here," rather Hines "was being approached by reporters and he wanted something to say."

The main proponents of this telling of events were Christopher W. Ruddy of the New York Post, and later with the Pittsburgh Tribune Review (owned by Richard Mellon Scaife), and Joseph Farah of the Western Journalism Center.

As to what prompted this line of investigation, reporter Dan Moldea claimed in an interview for Salon.com that "Foster had some blond hair and carpet fibers on his suit jacket, and he had semen in his underwear. So, the Jerry Falwells and the right-wing crowd get a hold of this information, and…they start making movies alleging that the Clintons were involved in this murder." Falwell produced the Clinton Chronicles, which Ruddy was involved with claiming the gun was placed in Fosters hand. These videos and claims have been "widely discredited" the videos "sophisticated production" served as a reliable resource.

Funding for the film was Citizens for Honest Government, which Jerry Falwell paid $200,000 to in 1994 and 1995. In 1995 Citizens for Honest Government paid two Arkansas state troopers to make allegations supporting the conspiracy about Vincent Foster. These two troopers were Roger Perry and Larry Patteson who also were paid for their testimony in the Paula Jones (See: Troopergate) claims. Citizens for Honest Government also covertly paid individuals who provided information to media outlets such as the Wall Street Journal editorial page and the American Spectator magazine, which named them as sources."

Patrick Matrisciana, president of Citizens for Honest Government, and producer of the Clinton Chronicles video appeared in its commercials as the "silhouetted individual whom he identifies only as an 'investigative reporter'." When asked about the scene Matrisciana admitted he was not a reporter and replied "I doubt our lives were actually ever in any real danger. That was Jerry's idea to do that ... He thought that would be dramatic."

Different theories

Some conspiracy theorists allege no bullet fragments were ever found and very little blood was present at the body's final location. Thus, the theorists assert suspicions that the body had been moved from another location to the park site. Some reject the official reports and believe that while Foster was located on an incline, the trickle of blood ran contrary to gravity. No explanation was offered to explain this. The U.S. Park Police were assigned to investigate the case, but no more information was ever disclosed.

With respect to this case, conspiracy theorists are largely divided into two groups. Some suspect that Foster committed suicide in a location that was embarrassing to figures connected to the Clinton administration and that government agents dumped his body in the park to avoid any embarrassment. Others suspect that Foster died from a shot from a small-caliber pistol to the neck and his body was dumped in the park. A book by Christopher Andersen entitled Bill and Hillary: The Marriage claims that Foster and Hillary Clinton were involved in an affair, and some claim that this supposed affair has some relation to Foster's death.Cite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page).

Special prosecutor Kenneth Starr, the independent counsel who investigated the Clintons on several other issues, including Whitewater, concluded after a three-year investigation that Foster shot himself. Miguel Rodriguez, an Assistant United States Attorney, after resigning from the Starr investigation, provided an interview regarding his participation in the investigation. He stated plainly that he resigned from the investigation after it became clear to him that suicide was the only acceptable determination despite the preponderance of evidence indicating homicide. According to Charles Carman, from the Center for Transparent Governance, it has been theorized that Foster was conflicted about forming a Presidential trust, in the face of growing scandal surrounding Bill and Hillary Clinton and their alleged role in a fraudulent Arkansas real estate deal known as the Whitewater Scandal. Urban-legend-debunking website Snopes.com cites the finding of the Starr investigation as evidence that Foster was not murdered: "If Foster had been murdered or if unanswered questions about his death remained, Starr would have been the last person to want to conclude the investigation prematurely."

FOIA request

In an extremely unusual move, however, in November 1994, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia circuit, in response to a request by the Wall Street Journal, under the Freedom of Information Act for the final Fiske Report, issued a prior restraint that prevented the Journal from publishing a story about its response to the request. Presumably, the court denied the request, but it also sealed its own response.