Talk:Feces: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 00:28, 5 June 2005 editCesarB (talk \| contribs)Administrators14,429 edits →Remember the []← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:30, 5 June 2005 edit undoNiglet (talk \| contribs)20 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 32:		Line 32:

	<!-- Place your vote for three inline images here with # ] 20:18, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC) -->		<!-- Place your vote for three inline images here with # ] 20:18, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC) -->
	* <s>Those who do not wish to see feces, should not search for it. ] 22:50, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)</s>		#Those who do not wish to see feces, should not search for it. ] 22:50, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)</s>
	*:I have crossed out this vote since it came from an anonymous IP and could be a ]. ] 00:20, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)		*:I have crossed out this vote since it came from an anonymous IP and could be a ]. ] 00:20, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	*:Thank you for your deep observation, anon, however did you consider that someone might not know what the word "feces" means? Such a person might want to learn what the word means without having to look at a picture that they might find repulsive. ] 22:53, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)		*:Thank you for your deep observation, anon, however did you consider that someone might not know what the word "feces" means? Such a person might want to learn what the word means without having to look at a picture that they might find repulsive. ] 22:53, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
			*::I have uncrossed this vote since I can find no evidence of a policy to disallow anonymous votes. This appears to simply be a way to skew the vote. --] 00:30, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
	*::Is this a poll or a debate? If a poll, then:		*::Is this a poll or a debate? If a poll, then:
	# The log of poo is A-OK. ] 22:57, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)		# The log of poo is A-OK. ] 22:57, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	#:Thank you for voting in the poll; hopefully more people will contribute to the poll ] 23:09, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)		#:Thank you for voting in the poll; hopefully more people will contribute to the poll ] 23:09, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
	#Polls are evil. --] (]) 00:24, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)		#Polls are evil. --] (]) 00:24, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
			#One vote for inline images. --] 00:30, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)

	'''All images except the human feces inline; human feces linked'''		'''All images except the human feces inline; human feces linked'''

Revision as of 00:30, 5 June 2005

Shall we have an explicit photo?

Why is there no picture of fresh feces? I understand there are problems with obtaining legal pictures on other Misplaced Pages pages but obtaining a picture of fresh feces is probably one of the easiest things.

The old photo before was small, petrified, and not characteristic of human feces. I have added a new photo which is more representative of a typical stool. Eyeon 05:29, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Sigh... Is this really necessary? Is there any reason that you have taken a picture of your dung other than for shock value? I'm going to shrink this so it's a little less visually putrid. --Barfooz (talk) 05:54, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This is an article on feces. There is no shock value when one looks up 'feces' and finds... gasp... feces. I have also included pigeon and rabbit feces. Eyeon 06:01, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Sometimes you have to step back, take a look at yourself, and realize that you are arguing about posting a picture of a turd. Fine, have your turd. I'm off to better-smelling areas of Misplaced Pages. --Barfooz (talk) 06:41, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages policy supports not including shocking images in articles. Images of feces evoke a universal disgust response and these images are only being included here for their shock value. The images will be available on a separate page. Nohat

I agree that the image should be linked, not included in the article itself as an inline image. Samboy 20:11, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

There are three images. Should all be censored? Eyeon 20:12, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

If they were censored they would have been removed from Misplaced Pages. They were not. They were just moved to a different page. That is not censorship. Nohat 20:17, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Let's make this a poll.

In general, anonymous votes do not count in Misplaced Pages polls. Nohat 00:04, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Do you wish to have, on this page:

All three images inline (on the page)

Those who do not wish to see feces, should not search for it. 70.177.90.39 22:50, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I have crossed out this vote since it came from an anonymous IP and could be a Sockpuppet. Samboy 00:20, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Thank you for your deep observation, anon, however did you consider that someone might not know what the word "feces" means? Such a person might want to learn what the word means without having to look at a picture that they might find repulsive. Nohat 22:53, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I have uncrossed this vote since I can find no evidence of a policy to disallow anonymous votes. This appears to simply be a way to skew the vote. --Niglet 00:30, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)

Is this a poll or a debate? If a poll, then:

The log of poo is A-OK. Eyeon 22:57, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Thank you for voting in the poll; hopefully more people will contribute to the poll Samboy 23:09, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Polls are evil. --SPUI (talk) 00:24, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
One vote for inline images. --Niglet 00:30, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)

All images except the human feces inline; human feces linked

Reasonable compromise; the rabbit and pigeon feces do not gross me out Samboy 20:18, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Should the pix on anus be deleted too, just because they might gross someone out? 70.177.90.39 00:06, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This isn't about anus—it's about feces. The same criteria do not apply. Nohat 00:10, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This is fine for now. However, images of fresh feces from other large mammals, like dogs, horses, or elephants, should probably also be put on a separate page. The criteria should be if it looks like it's very smelly, then it probably will invoke a disgust response in most people and should be on a separate page. The image page should remain prominently linked in the article so that those who are interested in such images will be able to easily find them. Nohat 20:25, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Are you proposing a new rule on Misplaced Pages: that which looks stink-ridden, should be well hidden? Eyeon 22:59, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This verson seems fine to me. Are we going to illustrate Everybody Poops? Rick K 23:34, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)

All three images linked

Let's not make this a poll.

Given that there are some negatives in inlining the picture of human feces, what is it supposed to illustrate? We can be comfortable in the assumption that once the matter is described, every reader of Misplaced Pages can consult some of the thousands of examples they produce in their lifetime. So what is the point (besides proving a point) being served by including the image inline? Demi /_C 00:22, 2005 Jun 5 (UTC)

Remember the 3rr

I see some 3rr violations:

User:Eyeon: 1 2 3 4

User:Nohat: 1 2 3 4

I'm asking both parties to not revert this page again; otherwise I'll have to ask for both of you to have a mandated 24-hour cooling-off period. Samboy 00:03, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Reverting vandalism does not count toward the 3RR. Modifying the article against current consensus constitutes vandalism. Nohat 00:05, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Nohat has a special rule for himself, apparently. I count 6 now. 70.177.90.39 00:11, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I suggest you read the policy: Misplaced Pages:Three-revert rule. It says This doesn't apply to self-reverts or correction of simple vandalism. Nohat 00:16, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Funny, what you were reverting is in no way vandalism. --SPUI (talk) 00:24, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Which, of course, depends on the definition of simple vandalism. I do not know if adding an offensive image counts as simple vandalism. Next time, let other editors do the reverting too. (And since 3RR is a maximum 24hr block, I can choose to not block you...) --cesarb 00:28, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)